审计费用-审计质量关系:员工董事会代表重要吗?

Andrews Owusu, Muhammad Atif, Mark David Holmes, Kamil Omoteso
{"title":"审计费用-审计质量关系:员工董事会代表重要吗?","authors":"Andrews Owusu, Muhammad Atif, Mark David Holmes, Kamil Omoteso","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the effect of employee board representation on audit fees and whether the interplay between audit fees and employee board representation has an impact on audit quality, as measured by discretionary accruals. Using a sample of 3142 firm-year observations across seven European countries over the period of 2005–2019, we show that employee board representation is negatively associated with audit fees, and this association is primarily observed when the number of employee directors reaches two or more. In addition, we test the possible channels through which employee board representation affects audit fees and show that the effect is stronger in firms with weak corporate governance. We also document that audit committee effectiveness moderates the relationship. Finally, we show that the observed lower audit fees lead to an improvement in audit quality, probably due to a stronger control environment and reduced audit risk in the presence of employee directors. Our main results are unchanged when using alternative measures, additional controls, subsample analysis, alternative econometric techniques, and identification strategies.","PeriodicalId":501001,"journal":{"name":"The British Accounting Review","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audit fees-audit quality relationship: Does employee board representation matter?\",\"authors\":\"Andrews Owusu, Muhammad Atif, Mark David Holmes, Kamil Omoteso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine the effect of employee board representation on audit fees and whether the interplay between audit fees and employee board representation has an impact on audit quality, as measured by discretionary accruals. Using a sample of 3142 firm-year observations across seven European countries over the period of 2005–2019, we show that employee board representation is negatively associated with audit fees, and this association is primarily observed when the number of employee directors reaches two or more. In addition, we test the possible channels through which employee board representation affects audit fees and show that the effect is stronger in firms with weak corporate governance. We also document that audit committee effectiveness moderates the relationship. Finally, we show that the observed lower audit fees lead to an improvement in audit quality, probably due to a stronger control environment and reduced audit risk in the presence of employee directors. Our main results are unchanged when using alternative measures, additional controls, subsample analysis, alternative econometric techniques, and identification strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Accounting Review\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Accounting Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们检验了员工董事会代表对审计费用的影响,以及审计费用和员工董事会代表之间的相互作用是否对审计质量有影响,以可自由支配的应计项目衡量。利用2005-2019年期间七个欧洲国家的3142个公司年度观察样本,我们表明,员工董事会代表性与审计费用呈负相关,当员工董事人数达到两名或两名以上时,这种关联主要被观察到。此外,我们测试了员工董事会代表影响审计费用的可能渠道,结果表明,在公司治理薄弱的公司,这种影响更强。我们还证明审计委员会的有效性调节了这种关系。最后,我们表明,审计费用的降低导致审计质量的提高,这可能是由于更强的控制环境和员工董事在场时审计风险的降低。我们的主要结果在使用替代测量、附加对照、子样本分析、替代计量经济学技术和识别策略时没有变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Audit fees-audit quality relationship: Does employee board representation matter?
We examine the effect of employee board representation on audit fees and whether the interplay between audit fees and employee board representation has an impact on audit quality, as measured by discretionary accruals. Using a sample of 3142 firm-year observations across seven European countries over the period of 2005–2019, we show that employee board representation is negatively associated with audit fees, and this association is primarily observed when the number of employee directors reaches two or more. In addition, we test the possible channels through which employee board representation affects audit fees and show that the effect is stronger in firms with weak corporate governance. We also document that audit committee effectiveness moderates the relationship. Finally, we show that the observed lower audit fees lead to an improvement in audit quality, probably due to a stronger control environment and reduced audit risk in the presence of employee directors. Our main results are unchanged when using alternative measures, additional controls, subsample analysis, alternative econometric techniques, and identification strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信