以材料为中心的循环创新框架,以解决资本项目交付中的成本和碳挑战:范围界定文献综述

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Mayank Jain, Peter Hopkinson, Markus Zils
{"title":"以材料为中心的循环创新框架,以解决资本项目交付中的成本和碳挑战:范围界定文献综述","authors":"Mayank Jain,&nbsp;Peter Hopkinson,&nbsp;Markus Zils","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Infrastructure capital project delivery faces institutional pressure to meet net-zero (NZ) targets. Achieving NZ often result in conflicting demands between cost and carbon targets, where reducing project costs increases carbon emissions and vice versa. The circular economy (CE) presents a promising alternative to the linear \"take-make-use-dispose\" model, addressing this challenge by designing waste out of the system and maximising the value retention of materials, components, and products. However, understanding how CE can be applied to complex capital project delivery, both in theory and in practice, remains fragmented. To demonstrate potential strategies and their impact, we conduct a systematic scoping review and mapping of interdisciplinary literature on capital project delivery and the circular economy. Our review proposes a Material-focused Circular Innovation (MFCI) framework, comprising sixteen strategies across six stages of the infrastructure asset lifecycle to address the challenge of cost and carbon. Overall, our study makes two contributions: (1) a template-driven systematic mapping approach as a tool to combine heterogeneous literature, offering a novel approach for developing interdisciplinary frameworks and theories, and (2) the MFCI framework provides a structured foundation for future research in the circular economy and capital project delivery to address NZ targets alongside existing cost targets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"225 ","pages":"Article 108613"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material-focused circular innovation framework to address the cost and carbon challenge in capital project delivery: A scoping literature review\",\"authors\":\"Mayank Jain,&nbsp;Peter Hopkinson,&nbsp;Markus Zils\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Infrastructure capital project delivery faces institutional pressure to meet net-zero (NZ) targets. Achieving NZ often result in conflicting demands between cost and carbon targets, where reducing project costs increases carbon emissions and vice versa. The circular economy (CE) presents a promising alternative to the linear \\\"take-make-use-dispose\\\" model, addressing this challenge by designing waste out of the system and maximising the value retention of materials, components, and products. However, understanding how CE can be applied to complex capital project delivery, both in theory and in practice, remains fragmented. To demonstrate potential strategies and their impact, we conduct a systematic scoping review and mapping of interdisciplinary literature on capital project delivery and the circular economy. Our review proposes a Material-focused Circular Innovation (MFCI) framework, comprising sixteen strategies across six stages of the infrastructure asset lifecycle to address the challenge of cost and carbon. Overall, our study makes two contributions: (1) a template-driven systematic mapping approach as a tool to combine heterogeneous literature, offering a novel approach for developing interdisciplinary frameworks and theories, and (2) the MFCI framework provides a structured foundation for future research in the circular economy and capital project delivery to address NZ targets alongside existing cost targets.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"225 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004902\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基础设施资本项目交付面临着实现净零(新西兰)目标的制度压力。实现NZ通常会导致成本和碳目标之间的需求冲突,减少项目成本会增加碳排放,反之亦然。循环经济(CE)提供了一个有希望的替代线性“获取-制造-使用-处理”模式,通过将废物设计出系统并最大化材料,组件和产品的价值保留来解决这一挑战。然而,在理论和实践上,对如何将CE应用于复杂资本项目交付的理解仍然是零散的。为了展示潜在的战略及其影响,我们对资本项目交付和循环经济的跨学科文献进行了系统的范围审查和绘制。我们的研究提出了一个以材料为中心的循环创新(MFCI)框架,包括跨越基础设施资产生命周期六个阶段的16项战略,以应对成本和碳排放的挑战。总的来说,我们的研究做出了两个贡献:(1)模板驱动的系统映射方法作为结合异质文献的工具,为开发跨学科框架和理论提供了一种新颖的方法;(2)MFCI框架为未来循环经济和资本项目交付的研究提供了结构化的基础,以解决新西兰的目标以及现有的成本目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Material-focused circular innovation framework to address the cost and carbon challenge in capital project delivery: A scoping literature review
Infrastructure capital project delivery faces institutional pressure to meet net-zero (NZ) targets. Achieving NZ often result in conflicting demands between cost and carbon targets, where reducing project costs increases carbon emissions and vice versa. The circular economy (CE) presents a promising alternative to the linear "take-make-use-dispose" model, addressing this challenge by designing waste out of the system and maximising the value retention of materials, components, and products. However, understanding how CE can be applied to complex capital project delivery, both in theory and in practice, remains fragmented. To demonstrate potential strategies and their impact, we conduct a systematic scoping review and mapping of interdisciplinary literature on capital project delivery and the circular economy. Our review proposes a Material-focused Circular Innovation (MFCI) framework, comprising sixteen strategies across six stages of the infrastructure asset lifecycle to address the challenge of cost and carbon. Overall, our study makes two contributions: (1) a template-driven systematic mapping approach as a tool to combine heterogeneous literature, offering a novel approach for developing interdisciplinary frameworks and theories, and (2) the MFCI framework provides a structured foundation for future research in the circular economy and capital project delivery to address NZ targets alongside existing cost targets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信