{"title":"以材料为中心的循环创新框架,以解决资本项目交付中的成本和碳挑战:范围界定文献综述","authors":"Mayank Jain, Peter Hopkinson, Markus Zils","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Infrastructure capital project delivery faces institutional pressure to meet net-zero (NZ) targets. Achieving NZ often result in conflicting demands between cost and carbon targets, where reducing project costs increases carbon emissions and vice versa. The circular economy (CE) presents a promising alternative to the linear \"take-make-use-dispose\" model, addressing this challenge by designing waste out of the system and maximising the value retention of materials, components, and products. However, understanding how CE can be applied to complex capital project delivery, both in theory and in practice, remains fragmented. To demonstrate potential strategies and their impact, we conduct a systematic scoping review and mapping of interdisciplinary literature on capital project delivery and the circular economy. Our review proposes a Material-focused Circular Innovation (MFCI) framework, comprising sixteen strategies across six stages of the infrastructure asset lifecycle to address the challenge of cost and carbon. Overall, our study makes two contributions: (1) a template-driven systematic mapping approach as a tool to combine heterogeneous literature, offering a novel approach for developing interdisciplinary frameworks and theories, and (2) the MFCI framework provides a structured foundation for future research in the circular economy and capital project delivery to address NZ targets alongside existing cost targets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"225 ","pages":"Article 108613"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material-focused circular innovation framework to address the cost and carbon challenge in capital project delivery: A scoping literature review\",\"authors\":\"Mayank Jain, Peter Hopkinson, Markus Zils\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Infrastructure capital project delivery faces institutional pressure to meet net-zero (NZ) targets. Achieving NZ often result in conflicting demands between cost and carbon targets, where reducing project costs increases carbon emissions and vice versa. The circular economy (CE) presents a promising alternative to the linear \\\"take-make-use-dispose\\\" model, addressing this challenge by designing waste out of the system and maximising the value retention of materials, components, and products. However, understanding how CE can be applied to complex capital project delivery, both in theory and in practice, remains fragmented. To demonstrate potential strategies and their impact, we conduct a systematic scoping review and mapping of interdisciplinary literature on capital project delivery and the circular economy. Our review proposes a Material-focused Circular Innovation (MFCI) framework, comprising sixteen strategies across six stages of the infrastructure asset lifecycle to address the challenge of cost and carbon. Overall, our study makes two contributions: (1) a template-driven systematic mapping approach as a tool to combine heterogeneous literature, offering a novel approach for developing interdisciplinary frameworks and theories, and (2) the MFCI framework provides a structured foundation for future research in the circular economy and capital project delivery to address NZ targets alongside existing cost targets.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"225 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004902\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Material-focused circular innovation framework to address the cost and carbon challenge in capital project delivery: A scoping literature review
Infrastructure capital project delivery faces institutional pressure to meet net-zero (NZ) targets. Achieving NZ often result in conflicting demands between cost and carbon targets, where reducing project costs increases carbon emissions and vice versa. The circular economy (CE) presents a promising alternative to the linear "take-make-use-dispose" model, addressing this challenge by designing waste out of the system and maximising the value retention of materials, components, and products. However, understanding how CE can be applied to complex capital project delivery, both in theory and in practice, remains fragmented. To demonstrate potential strategies and their impact, we conduct a systematic scoping review and mapping of interdisciplinary literature on capital project delivery and the circular economy. Our review proposes a Material-focused Circular Innovation (MFCI) framework, comprising sixteen strategies across six stages of the infrastructure asset lifecycle to address the challenge of cost and carbon. Overall, our study makes two contributions: (1) a template-driven systematic mapping approach as a tool to combine heterogeneous literature, offering a novel approach for developing interdisciplinary frameworks and theories, and (2) the MFCI framework provides a structured foundation for future research in the circular economy and capital project delivery to address NZ targets alongside existing cost targets.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.