BURGER:全球亚日强度-持续时间-频率数据的自下而上区域化方法

IF 5 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J. M. Hoch, I. Probyn, F. Marra, C. Lucas, J. Bates, A. Cooper, H. J. Fowler, S. Hatchard, E. Lewis, J. Savage, N. Addor, C. Sampson
{"title":"BURGER:全球亚日强度-持续时间-频率数据的自下而上区域化方法","authors":"J. M. Hoch, I. Probyn, F. Marra, C. Lucas, J. Bates, A. Cooper, H. J. Fowler, S. Hatchard, E. Lewis, J. Savage, N. Addor, C. Sampson","doi":"10.1029/2024wr039773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intensity‐Duration‐Frequency (IDF) curves require accurate observations which are not available everywhere. To provide globally consistent IDF maps, we harness the accuracy of Global Sub‐Daily Rainfall (GSDR) gauge observations and combine this with the power of a random forest regression model to regionalize the parameters of the SMEV (Simplified Metastatistical Extreme Value) distribution. After regionalization, it is possible to compute intensities for any combination of return period and duration up to 24 hr. These regionalized intensities are named BURGER, the “Bottom Up Regionalized Global Extreme Rainfall” data set. Comparing intensities from BURGER against those obtained at GSDR stations shows overall good agreement as supported by a median percentage bias around 0% and an interquartile range between −5% and 5%. Errors increase with less frequent events, indicating a too light tail of regionalized intensities, and show marked regional variations. Intensities from simulations excluding station data in Japan and Germany deviate up to 15% from those obtained with the station data included. A benchmark with a remote sensing‐based IDF data set did not reveal structurally lower agreement in ungauged regions compared to gauged regions, suggesting a reliable transfer to ungauged areas. Comparing results with other IDF data sets shows that differences between the underlying methods and data hamper a robust benchmark. For instance, while at some GSDR stations NOAA data agrees with BURGER data, NOAA data hardly agrees with empirically derived intensities at other stations. This first bottom‐up approach to global IDF data yields promising results and insights warranting future improvements.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BURGER: A Bottom‐Up Regionalization Approach for Global Sub‐Daily Intensity‐Duration‐Frequency Data\",\"authors\":\"J. M. Hoch, I. Probyn, F. Marra, C. Lucas, J. Bates, A. Cooper, H. J. Fowler, S. Hatchard, E. Lewis, J. Savage, N. Addor, C. Sampson\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024wr039773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intensity‐Duration‐Frequency (IDF) curves require accurate observations which are not available everywhere. To provide globally consistent IDF maps, we harness the accuracy of Global Sub‐Daily Rainfall (GSDR) gauge observations and combine this with the power of a random forest regression model to regionalize the parameters of the SMEV (Simplified Metastatistical Extreme Value) distribution. After regionalization, it is possible to compute intensities for any combination of return period and duration up to 24 hr. These regionalized intensities are named BURGER, the “Bottom Up Regionalized Global Extreme Rainfall” data set. Comparing intensities from BURGER against those obtained at GSDR stations shows overall good agreement as supported by a median percentage bias around 0% and an interquartile range between −5% and 5%. Errors increase with less frequent events, indicating a too light tail of regionalized intensities, and show marked regional variations. Intensities from simulations excluding station data in Japan and Germany deviate up to 15% from those obtained with the station data included. A benchmark with a remote sensing‐based IDF data set did not reveal structurally lower agreement in ungauged regions compared to gauged regions, suggesting a reliable transfer to ungauged areas. Comparing results with other IDF data sets shows that differences between the underlying methods and data hamper a robust benchmark. For instance, while at some GSDR stations NOAA data agrees with BURGER data, NOAA data hardly agrees with empirically derived intensities at other stations. This first bottom‐up approach to global IDF data yields promising results and insights warranting future improvements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr039773\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr039773","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强度-持续时间-频率(IDF)曲线需要精确的观测,但并非所有地方都能获得。为了提供全球一致的IDF地图,我们利用全球次日降雨量(GSDR)测量观测的准确性,并将其与随机森林回归模型的功能结合起来,对SMEV(简化亚稳态极值)分布的参数进行区域化。区域化后,可以计算返回期和持续时间的任何组合的强度,最长可达24小时。这些区域化强度被命名为BURGER,即“自下而上区域化全球极端降雨”数据集。将BURGER的强度与GSDR站获得的强度进行比较,结果显示总体上一致性良好,中位数百分比偏差约为0%,四分位数范围为- 5%至5%。误差随事件频次的减少而增加,表明区域化强度的尾巴太轻,并显示出明显的区域差异。不包括日本和德国台站数据的模拟强度与包括台站数据的模拟强度相差高达15%。基于遥感的IDF数据集的基准并未显示未测量地区与测量地区相比结构上的一致性较低,这表明向未测量地区的可靠转移。将结果与其他IDF数据集进行比较表明,底层方法和数据之间的差异阻碍了稳健的基准测试。例如,在一些GSDR台站,NOAA数据与BURGER数据一致,而在其他台站,NOAA数据与经验得出的强度几乎不一致。这是全球IDF数据的第一个自下而上的方法,产生了有希望的结果和见解,保证未来的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BURGER: A Bottom‐Up Regionalization Approach for Global Sub‐Daily Intensity‐Duration‐Frequency Data
Intensity‐Duration‐Frequency (IDF) curves require accurate observations which are not available everywhere. To provide globally consistent IDF maps, we harness the accuracy of Global Sub‐Daily Rainfall (GSDR) gauge observations and combine this with the power of a random forest regression model to regionalize the parameters of the SMEV (Simplified Metastatistical Extreme Value) distribution. After regionalization, it is possible to compute intensities for any combination of return period and duration up to 24 hr. These regionalized intensities are named BURGER, the “Bottom Up Regionalized Global Extreme Rainfall” data set. Comparing intensities from BURGER against those obtained at GSDR stations shows overall good agreement as supported by a median percentage bias around 0% and an interquartile range between −5% and 5%. Errors increase with less frequent events, indicating a too light tail of regionalized intensities, and show marked regional variations. Intensities from simulations excluding station data in Japan and Germany deviate up to 15% from those obtained with the station data included. A benchmark with a remote sensing‐based IDF data set did not reveal structurally lower agreement in ungauged regions compared to gauged regions, suggesting a reliable transfer to ungauged areas. Comparing results with other IDF data sets shows that differences between the underlying methods and data hamper a robust benchmark. For instance, while at some GSDR stations NOAA data agrees with BURGER data, NOAA data hardly agrees with empirically derived intensities at other stations. This first bottom‐up approach to global IDF data yields promising results and insights warranting future improvements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信