保存比例受损肺活量和气道阻塞的肺癌风险:一项英国生物库研究。

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.09.127
Joon Young Choi,Chin Kook Rhee,Jongin Lee
{"title":"保存比例受损肺活量和气道阻塞的肺癌风险:一项英国生物库研究。","authors":"Joon Young Choi,Chin Kook Rhee,Jongin Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.09.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPreserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) has emerged as a distinct pulmonary pattern with potential clinical significance, but its association with lung cancer risk remains unclear.\r\n\r\nRESEARCH QUESTION\r\nThis study compared the risk of incident lung cancer among individuals with PRISm to that among those with normal spirometry and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN AND METHODS\r\nWe analyzed data from 267,222 UK Biobank participants who underwent spirometry at baseline and had no history of cancer before enrollment. Lung function was categorized as normal, PRISm (FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.70 and FEV1 < 80% predicted), mild COPD (FEV1/FVC < 0.70 and FEV1 ≥ 80%), and moderate-to-severe COPD (FEV1/FVC < 0.70 and FEV1 < 80%). Incident lung cancer cases were identified through linkage to national cancer registries. Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs), adjusting for confoundings.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nDuring a median follow-up of 13 years, 2,058 incident lung cancer cases were identified. In multivariate models, the adjusted HR for lung cancer was 1.59 (95% CI 1.38-1.82) in the PRISm group, 1.75 (95% CI 1.51-2.02) in mild COPD, and 2.92 (95% CI 2.62-3.25) in moderate-to-severe COPD, compared to that among individuals with normal spirometry. Results from the competing risk model were consistent, with an sHR of 1.55 (95% CI 1.35-1.79) in PRISm.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nPRISm is independently associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. It is necessary to improve risk stratification and potential early screening strategies in PRISm populations.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION\r\nNA.","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung Cancer Risk in Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry and Airway Obstruction: A UK Biobank Study.\",\"authors\":\"Joon Young Choi,Chin Kook Rhee,Jongin Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2025.09.127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPreserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) has emerged as a distinct pulmonary pattern with potential clinical significance, but its association with lung cancer risk remains unclear.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESEARCH QUESTION\\r\\nThis study compared the risk of incident lung cancer among individuals with PRISm to that among those with normal spirometry and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY DESIGN AND METHODS\\r\\nWe analyzed data from 267,222 UK Biobank participants who underwent spirometry at baseline and had no history of cancer before enrollment. Lung function was categorized as normal, PRISm (FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.70 and FEV1 < 80% predicted), mild COPD (FEV1/FVC < 0.70 and FEV1 ≥ 80%), and moderate-to-severe COPD (FEV1/FVC < 0.70 and FEV1 < 80%). Incident lung cancer cases were identified through linkage to national cancer registries. Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs), adjusting for confoundings.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nDuring a median follow-up of 13 years, 2,058 incident lung cancer cases were identified. In multivariate models, the adjusted HR for lung cancer was 1.59 (95% CI 1.38-1.82) in the PRISm group, 1.75 (95% CI 1.51-2.02) in mild COPD, and 2.92 (95% CI 2.62-3.25) in moderate-to-severe COPD, compared to that among individuals with normal spirometry. Results from the competing risk model were consistent, with an sHR of 1.55 (95% CI 1.35-1.79) in PRISm.\\r\\n\\r\\nINTERPRETATION\\r\\nPRISm is independently associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. It is necessary to improve risk stratification and potential early screening strategies in PRISm populations.\\r\\n\\r\\nCLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION\\r\\nNA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.09.127\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.09.127","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保留比例肺功能受损(PRISm)已成为一种独特的肺模式,具有潜在的临床意义,但其与肺癌风险的关系尚不清楚。研究问题:本研究比较了PRISm患者与正常肺活量和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者发生肺癌的风险。研究设计和方法我们分析了267,222名英国生物银行参与者的数据,这些参与者在基线时接受了肺活量测定,在入组前没有癌症史。肺功能分为正常、PRISm (FEV1/FVC≥0.70,FEV1 <预测值80%)、轻度COPD (FEV1/FVC < 0.70, FEV1≥80%)、中重度COPD (FEV1/FVC < 0.70, FEV1 < 80%)。通过与国家癌症登记处的联系,确定了肺癌病例。Cox比例风险和Fine-Gray竞争风险模型用于估计风险比(hr)和亚分布风险比(sHRs),并对混杂因素进行调整。结果在中位13年的随访期间,共发现2058例肺癌病例。在多变量模型中,与肺量测定正常的个体相比,PRISm组肺癌的校正HR为1.59 (95% CI 1.38-1.82),轻度COPD为1.75 (95% CI 1.51-2.02),中重度COPD为2.92 (95% CI 2.62-3.25)。竞争风险模型的结果一致,PRISm的sHR为1.55 (95% CI 1.35-1.79)。prism与肺癌风险增加独立相关。有必要改进PRISm人群的风险分层和潜在的早期筛查策略。临床试验注册
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lung Cancer Risk in Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry and Airway Obstruction: A UK Biobank Study.
BACKGROUND Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) has emerged as a distinct pulmonary pattern with potential clinical significance, but its association with lung cancer risk remains unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION This study compared the risk of incident lung cancer among individuals with PRISm to that among those with normal spirometry and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We analyzed data from 267,222 UK Biobank participants who underwent spirometry at baseline and had no history of cancer before enrollment. Lung function was categorized as normal, PRISm (FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.70 and FEV1 < 80% predicted), mild COPD (FEV1/FVC < 0.70 and FEV1 ≥ 80%), and moderate-to-severe COPD (FEV1/FVC < 0.70 and FEV1 < 80%). Incident lung cancer cases were identified through linkage to national cancer registries. Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs), adjusting for confoundings. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 13 years, 2,058 incident lung cancer cases were identified. In multivariate models, the adjusted HR for lung cancer was 1.59 (95% CI 1.38-1.82) in the PRISm group, 1.75 (95% CI 1.51-2.02) in mild COPD, and 2.92 (95% CI 2.62-3.25) in moderate-to-severe COPD, compared to that among individuals with normal spirometry. Results from the competing risk model were consistent, with an sHR of 1.55 (95% CI 1.35-1.79) in PRISm. INTERPRETATION PRISm is independently associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. It is necessary to improve risk stratification and potential early screening strategies in PRISm populations. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信