水生食品中的重金属风险

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hao Xu, Richard Newton, David C. Love, Yong Zhao, Jogeir Toppe, Wenbo Zhang
{"title":"水生食品中的重金属风险","authors":"Hao Xu, Richard Newton, David C. Love, Yong Zhao, Jogeir Toppe, Wenbo Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.envint.2025.109831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aquatic foods provide essential nutrients but can also contain hazardous heavy metals like mercury, cadmium, lead, and arsenic, posing health risks. This study analysed over 138,000 records from the World Health Organization to assess heavy metal levels in aquatic foods, conducting health risk and risk–benefit assessments. Results showed that 97.6 % of aquatic products met safety standards, with mercury at 96.2 % and cadmium at 97.2 % compliance, but species standards varied, and regional compliance differences were observed. Mercury levels are relatively high in fish, while cadmium, lead, and arsenic levels are elevated in molluscs, and cadmium levels are high in cephalopods. Mercury is biomagnified through the food chain, while cadmium, lead, and arsenic exhibit biodilution. Health risk assessment showed that mercury is the primary non-cancer risk, while cadmium, lead, and arsenic are sources of cancer risk. Mercury from aquatic food consumption exceeded the non-cancer risk threshold in 69 countries, and cadmium exceeded cancer risk threshold in 20 countries, while 152 countries remained within acceptable health risk thresholds. Risk-benefit assessment indicated that the health benefits of EPA + DHA intake from aquatic food consumption outweigh the heavy metal-related risks, with net benefit limits higher than safe consumption limits. Current aquatic consumption level is below safe consumption limits, but reducing consumption of high-risk aquatic products can effectively lower health risks. This study provides a global comprehensive evidence base to inform targeted interventions, policies, industry practices, and consumer choices for mitigating risks while promoting sustainable aquatic food consumption as a vital nutritional resource.","PeriodicalId":308,"journal":{"name":"Environment International","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heavy metal risks in aquatic foods\",\"authors\":\"Hao Xu, Richard Newton, David C. Love, Yong Zhao, Jogeir Toppe, Wenbo Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envint.2025.109831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aquatic foods provide essential nutrients but can also contain hazardous heavy metals like mercury, cadmium, lead, and arsenic, posing health risks. This study analysed over 138,000 records from the World Health Organization to assess heavy metal levels in aquatic foods, conducting health risk and risk–benefit assessments. Results showed that 97.6 % of aquatic products met safety standards, with mercury at 96.2 % and cadmium at 97.2 % compliance, but species standards varied, and regional compliance differences were observed. Mercury levels are relatively high in fish, while cadmium, lead, and arsenic levels are elevated in molluscs, and cadmium levels are high in cephalopods. Mercury is biomagnified through the food chain, while cadmium, lead, and arsenic exhibit biodilution. Health risk assessment showed that mercury is the primary non-cancer risk, while cadmium, lead, and arsenic are sources of cancer risk. Mercury from aquatic food consumption exceeded the non-cancer risk threshold in 69 countries, and cadmium exceeded cancer risk threshold in 20 countries, while 152 countries remained within acceptable health risk thresholds. Risk-benefit assessment indicated that the health benefits of EPA + DHA intake from aquatic food consumption outweigh the heavy metal-related risks, with net benefit limits higher than safe consumption limits. Current aquatic consumption level is below safe consumption limits, but reducing consumption of high-risk aquatic products can effectively lower health risks. This study provides a global comprehensive evidence base to inform targeted interventions, policies, industry practices, and consumer choices for mitigating risks while promoting sustainable aquatic food consumption as a vital nutritional resource.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment International\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109831\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment International","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109831","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水生食物提供必需的营养,但也可能含有有害的重金属,如汞、镉、铅和砷,对健康构成威胁。本研究分析了世界卫生组织138,000多条记录,以评估水生食品中的重金属水平,进行健康风险和风险效益评估。结果表明,水产品合格率为97.6% %,其中汞合格率为96.2% %,镉合格率为97.2% %,但品种标准不同,地区合格率存在差异。鱼类体内的汞含量相对较高,而软体动物体内的镉、铅和砷含量较高,头足类动物体内的镉含量较高。汞通过食物链被生物放大,而镉、铅和砷表现出生物稀释。健康风险评估表明,汞是主要的非癌症风险,而镉、铅和砷是癌症风险的来源。来自水生食品消费的汞在69个国家超过非癌症风险阈值,镉在20个国家超过癌症风险阈值,而152个国家仍在可接受的健康风险阈值范围内。风险-效益评估表明,EPA + 水产品DHA摄入的健康效益大于重金属相关风险,净效益限值高于安全消费限值。目前水产品消费水平低于安全消费限度,但减少高风险水产品消费可有效降低健康风险。本研究提供了一个全球性的综合证据基础,为有针对性的干预措施、政策、行业实践和消费者选择提供信息,以减轻风险,同时促进作为重要营养资源的可持续水产食品消费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heavy metal risks in aquatic foods
Aquatic foods provide essential nutrients but can also contain hazardous heavy metals like mercury, cadmium, lead, and arsenic, posing health risks. This study analysed over 138,000 records from the World Health Organization to assess heavy metal levels in aquatic foods, conducting health risk and risk–benefit assessments. Results showed that 97.6 % of aquatic products met safety standards, with mercury at 96.2 % and cadmium at 97.2 % compliance, but species standards varied, and regional compliance differences were observed. Mercury levels are relatively high in fish, while cadmium, lead, and arsenic levels are elevated in molluscs, and cadmium levels are high in cephalopods. Mercury is biomagnified through the food chain, while cadmium, lead, and arsenic exhibit biodilution. Health risk assessment showed that mercury is the primary non-cancer risk, while cadmium, lead, and arsenic are sources of cancer risk. Mercury from aquatic food consumption exceeded the non-cancer risk threshold in 69 countries, and cadmium exceeded cancer risk threshold in 20 countries, while 152 countries remained within acceptable health risk thresholds. Risk-benefit assessment indicated that the health benefits of EPA + DHA intake from aquatic food consumption outweigh the heavy metal-related risks, with net benefit limits higher than safe consumption limits. Current aquatic consumption level is below safe consumption limits, but reducing consumption of high-risk aquatic products can effectively lower health risks. This study provides a global comprehensive evidence base to inform targeted interventions, policies, industry practices, and consumer choices for mitigating risks while promoting sustainable aquatic food consumption as a vital nutritional resource.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environment International
Environment International 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
734
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health publishes manuscripts focusing on critical aspects of environmental and occupational medicine, including studies in toxicology and epidemiology, to illuminate the human health implications of exposure to environmental hazards. The journal adopts an open-access model and practices open peer review. It caters to scientists and practitioners across all environmental science domains, directly or indirectly impacting human health and well-being. With a commitment to enhancing the prevention of environmentally-related health risks, Environmental Health serves as a public health journal for the community and scientists engaged in matters of public health significance concerning the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信