基于全球老龄化数据的统一脆弱性指数

Benjamin Seligman, Mark Ward, Maddalena Ferranna, David E Bloom, Rose Anne Kenny, Ariela R Orkaby
{"title":"基于全球老龄化数据的统一脆弱性指数","authors":"Benjamin Seligman, Mark Ward, Maddalena Ferranna, David E Bloom, Rose Anne Kenny, Ariela R Orkaby","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Frailty is a common syndrome among older adults, associated with multiple adverse health outcomes. Work harmonizing frailty measurement across 25 countries and regions and different socioeconomic environments is limited. A harmonized definition is needed to assess frailty across settings to inform comparative studies of health and health care. Methods Data on adults aged 50+ from eight health and retirement surveys were analyzed: CHARLS (China), ELSA (England and Wales), ELSI (Brazil), HRS (USA), LASI (India), MHAS (Mexico), SHARE (Europe and Israel), and TILDA (Ireland). We produced 30-item deficit accumulation frailty index (FI) from shared variables. We assessed within-survey distributions and, in four surveys with available data (HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA), association with mortality. Results 184,715 participants were included; mean (SD) age was 65.1 (9.80) and 55.1% were female. Mean (SD) FI was 0.196 (0.133), and 39.2% were frail. Frailty distributions were right-skewed, with higher median FI for females than males (p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed lower survival with greater frailty in studies with survival data. Hazard ratios (95% CI, p-value) for severe frailty (FI ≥ 0.4) compared with non-frailty (FI < 0.1) after adjustment for age, gender, and smoking status were 5.50 (4.89–6.19), 4.36 (3.67–5.18), 8.81 (6.44–12.05), and 3.97 (2.99–5.27) for HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA respectively, all with p < 0.0001. Conclusions This is a harmonized FI developed using data from multiple settings, with strong associations with mortality. This is a useful tool to better understand aging in a global context.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"159 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Harmonized Frailty Index Using Global Aging Data\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Seligman, Mark Ward, Maddalena Ferranna, David E Bloom, Rose Anne Kenny, Ariela R Orkaby\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glaf217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Frailty is a common syndrome among older adults, associated with multiple adverse health outcomes. Work harmonizing frailty measurement across 25 countries and regions and different socioeconomic environments is limited. A harmonized definition is needed to assess frailty across settings to inform comparative studies of health and health care. Methods Data on adults aged 50+ from eight health and retirement surveys were analyzed: CHARLS (China), ELSA (England and Wales), ELSI (Brazil), HRS (USA), LASI (India), MHAS (Mexico), SHARE (Europe and Israel), and TILDA (Ireland). We produced 30-item deficit accumulation frailty index (FI) from shared variables. We assessed within-survey distributions and, in four surveys with available data (HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA), association with mortality. Results 184,715 participants were included; mean (SD) age was 65.1 (9.80) and 55.1% were female. Mean (SD) FI was 0.196 (0.133), and 39.2% were frail. Frailty distributions were right-skewed, with higher median FI for females than males (p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed lower survival with greater frailty in studies with survival data. Hazard ratios (95% CI, p-value) for severe frailty (FI ≥ 0.4) compared with non-frailty (FI < 0.1) after adjustment for age, gender, and smoking status were 5.50 (4.89–6.19), 4.36 (3.67–5.18), 8.81 (6.44–12.05), and 3.97 (2.99–5.27) for HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA respectively, all with p < 0.0001. Conclusions This is a harmonized FI developed using data from multiple settings, with strong associations with mortality. This is a useful tool to better understand aging in a global context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"159 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚弱是老年人的一种常见综合征,与多种不良健康结局相关。在25个国家和地区以及不同社会经济环境中协调脆弱性衡量的工作是有限的。需要一个统一的定义来评估各种环境下的脆弱性,以便为健康和保健的比较研究提供信息。方法对CHARLS(中国)、ELSA(英格兰和威尔士)、ELSI(巴西)、HRS(美国)、LASI(印度)、MHAS(墨西哥)、SHARE(欧洲和以色列)和TILDA(爱尔兰)8项50岁以上成年人健康和退休调查数据进行分析。我们从共享变量中产生了30项赤字积累脆弱指数(FI)。我们评估了调查内分布,并在四项有可用数据的调查(HRS、MHAS、SHARE和TILDA)中评估了与死亡率的关联。结果共纳入184,715名受试者;平均(SD)年龄为65.1岁(9.80岁),女性占55.1%。平均(SD) FI为0.196(0.133),39.2%虚弱。衰弱分布呈右偏,女性的FI中位数高于男性(p < 0.0001)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,在有生存数据的研究中,较低的生存率和较高的脆弱性。经年龄、性别和吸烟状况调整后,严重虚弱(FI≥0.4)与非虚弱(FI < 0.1)的危险比(95% CI, p值)分别为5.50(4.89-6.19)、4.36(3.67-5.18)、8.81(6.44-12.05)和3.97 (2.99-5.27),HRS、MHAS、SHARE和TILDA,均有p &;lt;0.0001. 结论:这是一个统一的FI,使用来自多个设置的数据,与死亡率有很强的关联。这是一个有用的工具,可以更好地理解全球背景下的老龄化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Harmonized Frailty Index Using Global Aging Data
Background Frailty is a common syndrome among older adults, associated with multiple adverse health outcomes. Work harmonizing frailty measurement across 25 countries and regions and different socioeconomic environments is limited. A harmonized definition is needed to assess frailty across settings to inform comparative studies of health and health care. Methods Data on adults aged 50+ from eight health and retirement surveys were analyzed: CHARLS (China), ELSA (England and Wales), ELSI (Brazil), HRS (USA), LASI (India), MHAS (Mexico), SHARE (Europe and Israel), and TILDA (Ireland). We produced 30-item deficit accumulation frailty index (FI) from shared variables. We assessed within-survey distributions and, in four surveys with available data (HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA), association with mortality. Results 184,715 participants were included; mean (SD) age was 65.1 (9.80) and 55.1% were female. Mean (SD) FI was 0.196 (0.133), and 39.2% were frail. Frailty distributions were right-skewed, with higher median FI for females than males (p &lt; 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed lower survival with greater frailty in studies with survival data. Hazard ratios (95% CI, p-value) for severe frailty (FI ≥ 0.4) compared with non-frailty (FI &lt; 0.1) after adjustment for age, gender, and smoking status were 5.50 (4.89–6.19), 4.36 (3.67–5.18), 8.81 (6.44–12.05), and 3.97 (2.99–5.27) for HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA respectively, all with p &lt; 0.0001. Conclusions This is a harmonized FI developed using data from multiple settings, with strong associations with mortality. This is a useful tool to better understand aging in a global context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信