Benjamin Seligman, Mark Ward, Maddalena Ferranna, David E Bloom, Rose Anne Kenny, Ariela R Orkaby
{"title":"基于全球老龄化数据的统一脆弱性指数","authors":"Benjamin Seligman, Mark Ward, Maddalena Ferranna, David E Bloom, Rose Anne Kenny, Ariela R Orkaby","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Frailty is a common syndrome among older adults, associated with multiple adverse health outcomes. Work harmonizing frailty measurement across 25 countries and regions and different socioeconomic environments is limited. A harmonized definition is needed to assess frailty across settings to inform comparative studies of health and health care. Methods Data on adults aged 50+ from eight health and retirement surveys were analyzed: CHARLS (China), ELSA (England and Wales), ELSI (Brazil), HRS (USA), LASI (India), MHAS (Mexico), SHARE (Europe and Israel), and TILDA (Ireland). We produced 30-item deficit accumulation frailty index (FI) from shared variables. We assessed within-survey distributions and, in four surveys with available data (HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA), association with mortality. Results 184,715 participants were included; mean (SD) age was 65.1 (9.80) and 55.1% were female. Mean (SD) FI was 0.196 (0.133), and 39.2% were frail. Frailty distributions were right-skewed, with higher median FI for females than males (p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed lower survival with greater frailty in studies with survival data. Hazard ratios (95% CI, p-value) for severe frailty (FI ≥ 0.4) compared with non-frailty (FI < 0.1) after adjustment for age, gender, and smoking status were 5.50 (4.89–6.19), 4.36 (3.67–5.18), 8.81 (6.44–12.05), and 3.97 (2.99–5.27) for HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA respectively, all with p < 0.0001. Conclusions This is a harmonized FI developed using data from multiple settings, with strong associations with mortality. This is a useful tool to better understand aging in a global context.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"159 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Harmonized Frailty Index Using Global Aging Data\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Seligman, Mark Ward, Maddalena Ferranna, David E Bloom, Rose Anne Kenny, Ariela R Orkaby\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glaf217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Frailty is a common syndrome among older adults, associated with multiple adverse health outcomes. Work harmonizing frailty measurement across 25 countries and regions and different socioeconomic environments is limited. A harmonized definition is needed to assess frailty across settings to inform comparative studies of health and health care. Methods Data on adults aged 50+ from eight health and retirement surveys were analyzed: CHARLS (China), ELSA (England and Wales), ELSI (Brazil), HRS (USA), LASI (India), MHAS (Mexico), SHARE (Europe and Israel), and TILDA (Ireland). We produced 30-item deficit accumulation frailty index (FI) from shared variables. We assessed within-survey distributions and, in four surveys with available data (HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA), association with mortality. Results 184,715 participants were included; mean (SD) age was 65.1 (9.80) and 55.1% were female. Mean (SD) FI was 0.196 (0.133), and 39.2% were frail. Frailty distributions were right-skewed, with higher median FI for females than males (p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed lower survival with greater frailty in studies with survival data. Hazard ratios (95% CI, p-value) for severe frailty (FI ≥ 0.4) compared with non-frailty (FI < 0.1) after adjustment for age, gender, and smoking status were 5.50 (4.89–6.19), 4.36 (3.67–5.18), 8.81 (6.44–12.05), and 3.97 (2.99–5.27) for HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA respectively, all with p < 0.0001. Conclusions This is a harmonized FI developed using data from multiple settings, with strong associations with mortality. This is a useful tool to better understand aging in a global context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"159 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Harmonized Frailty Index Using Global Aging Data
Background Frailty is a common syndrome among older adults, associated with multiple adverse health outcomes. Work harmonizing frailty measurement across 25 countries and regions and different socioeconomic environments is limited. A harmonized definition is needed to assess frailty across settings to inform comparative studies of health and health care. Methods Data on adults aged 50+ from eight health and retirement surveys were analyzed: CHARLS (China), ELSA (England and Wales), ELSI (Brazil), HRS (USA), LASI (India), MHAS (Mexico), SHARE (Europe and Israel), and TILDA (Ireland). We produced 30-item deficit accumulation frailty index (FI) from shared variables. We assessed within-survey distributions and, in four surveys with available data (HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA), association with mortality. Results 184,715 participants were included; mean (SD) age was 65.1 (9.80) and 55.1% were female. Mean (SD) FI was 0.196 (0.133), and 39.2% were frail. Frailty distributions were right-skewed, with higher median FI for females than males (p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed lower survival with greater frailty in studies with survival data. Hazard ratios (95% CI, p-value) for severe frailty (FI ≥ 0.4) compared with non-frailty (FI < 0.1) after adjustment for age, gender, and smoking status were 5.50 (4.89–6.19), 4.36 (3.67–5.18), 8.81 (6.44–12.05), and 3.97 (2.99–5.27) for HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA respectively, all with p < 0.0001. Conclusions This is a harmonized FI developed using data from multiple settings, with strong associations with mortality. This is a useful tool to better understand aging in a global context.