人工智能驱动的NCCT大血管闭塞检测:一项多机构研究。

Ansaar T Rai, Abdulrahman Al Halak, Mohamad Abdalkader, Artem Kaliaev, Thanh N Nguyen, David F Kallmes, Waleed Brinjikji, Thien Huynh, Dhairya Lakhani, Alistair Perry, Olivier Joly, Pau Bellot, James H Briggs, Zoe V J Woodhead, George Harston, Davide Carone
{"title":"人工智能驱动的NCCT大血管闭塞检测:一项多机构研究。","authors":"Ansaar T Rai, Abdulrahman Al Halak, Mohamad Abdalkader, Artem Kaliaev, Thanh N Nguyen, David F Kallmes, Waleed Brinjikji, Thien Huynh, Dhairya Lakhani, Alistair Perry, Olivier Joly, Pau Bellot, James H Briggs, Zoe V J Woodhead, George Harston, Davide Carone","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Imaging triage of stroke patients is primarily based on perfusion imaging. Simplified triage based on non-contrast CT are limited (NCCT). To evaluate the predictive capability of a deep learning algorithm, \"Triage Stroke\" (Brainomix 360) in identifying anterior circulation large vessel occlusions (LVO) on NCCT in patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multi-institutional study analyzed 612 patients with suspected AIS at 3 US comprehensive stroke centers. A balanced cohort of consecutive patients with and without anterior circulation LVO was analyzed. Ground truth was based on concurrent CTA evaluated by site neuroradiologists. The primary outcome was predictive performance for LVO detection. The secondary outcomes were 1) prospective comparison of NCCT LVO detection against general radiologists and subspecialty neuroradiologists, and 2) the influence of NIHSS on the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Triage Stroke software detected an LVO on NCCT with a 67% sensitivity and 93% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were 59% and 95%, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8. The software's sensitivity for LVO detection was significantly higher than the group average of all radiologists (difference = 20.5%; CI, 8.26-32.78; <i>P</i> = .001) and was also higher when separated into general and neuroradiology subgroups. The AUC for NCCT LVO was significantly higher than the group of all readers (difference = 11%; CI, 4%-17%; <i>P</i> < .001), and the nonexpert readers (difference = 13%, CI, 7%-20%; <i>P</i> < .001). The addition of NIHSS to the model yielded a high specificity (99%) and similar sensitivity (65%), resulting in the optimum positive predictive value of all models tested (91%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Triage Stroke software demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for NCCT detection of anterior circulation LVOs outperforming radiologists. Coupled with NIHSS it may simplify identification of endovascular candidates especially in resource-constrained environments worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence-Driven Detection of Large Vessel Occlusions on NCCT: A Multi-Institutional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ansaar T Rai, Abdulrahman Al Halak, Mohamad Abdalkader, Artem Kaliaev, Thanh N Nguyen, David F Kallmes, Waleed Brinjikji, Thien Huynh, Dhairya Lakhani, Alistair Perry, Olivier Joly, Pau Bellot, James H Briggs, Zoe V J Woodhead, George Harston, Davide Carone\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Imaging triage of stroke patients is primarily based on perfusion imaging. Simplified triage based on non-contrast CT are limited (NCCT). To evaluate the predictive capability of a deep learning algorithm, \\\"Triage Stroke\\\" (Brainomix 360) in identifying anterior circulation large vessel occlusions (LVO) on NCCT in patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multi-institutional study analyzed 612 patients with suspected AIS at 3 US comprehensive stroke centers. A balanced cohort of consecutive patients with and without anterior circulation LVO was analyzed. Ground truth was based on concurrent CTA evaluated by site neuroradiologists. The primary outcome was predictive performance for LVO detection. The secondary outcomes were 1) prospective comparison of NCCT LVO detection against general radiologists and subspecialty neuroradiologists, and 2) the influence of NIHSS on the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Triage Stroke software detected an LVO on NCCT with a 67% sensitivity and 93% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were 59% and 95%, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8. The software's sensitivity for LVO detection was significantly higher than the group average of all radiologists (difference = 20.5%; CI, 8.26-32.78; <i>P</i> = .001) and was also higher when separated into general and neuroradiology subgroups. The AUC for NCCT LVO was significantly higher than the group of all readers (difference = 11%; CI, 4%-17%; <i>P</i> < .001), and the nonexpert readers (difference = 13%, CI, 7%-20%; <i>P</i> < .001). The addition of NIHSS to the model yielded a high specificity (99%) and similar sensitivity (65%), resulting in the optimum positive predictive value of all models tested (91%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Triage Stroke software demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for NCCT detection of anterior circulation LVOs outperforming radiologists. Coupled with NIHSS it may simplify identification of endovascular candidates especially in resource-constrained environments worldwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:脑卒中患者的影像学分诊主要基于灌注成像。基于非对比CT的简化分类是有限的(NCCT)。为了评估深度学习算法“Triage卒中”(Brainomix 360)在疑似急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的NCCT上识别前循环大血管闭塞(LVO)的预测能力。材料和方法:这项多机构研究分析了美国3个综合卒中中心的612例疑似AIS患者。对有和没有前循环左心室淤血的连续患者进行平衡队列分析。基础事实是基于现场神经放射学家评估的并发CTA。主要结果是LVO检测的预测性能。次要结果为:(1)NCCT LVO检测与普通放射科医师和亚专科神经放射科医师的前瞻性比较;(2)NIHSS对模型的影响。结果:Triage卒中软件检测NCCT的LVO具有67%的敏感性和93%的特异性。阳性预测值为59%,阴性预测值为95%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.8。该软件检测LVO的灵敏度显著高于所有放射科医生的组平均水平(差异= 20.5%;CI, 8.26-32.78; P = .001),并且在分为普通和神经放射亚组时也更高。NCCT LVO的AUC显著高于所有阅读者组(差异= 11%;CI, 4%-17%; P < .001)和非专家阅读者组(差异= 13%,CI, 7%-20%; P < .001)。将NIHSS添加到模型中产生了高特异性(99%)和相似的敏感性(65%),导致所有测试模型的最佳阳性预测值(91%)。结论:Triage卒中软件在NCCT检测前循环LVOs方面表现出强大的预测能力,优于放射科医生。结合NIHSS,它可以简化血管内候选者的识别,特别是在全球资源受限的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Detection of Large Vessel Occlusions on NCCT: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Background and purpose: Imaging triage of stroke patients is primarily based on perfusion imaging. Simplified triage based on non-contrast CT are limited (NCCT). To evaluate the predictive capability of a deep learning algorithm, "Triage Stroke" (Brainomix 360) in identifying anterior circulation large vessel occlusions (LVO) on NCCT in patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Materials and methods: This multi-institutional study analyzed 612 patients with suspected AIS at 3 US comprehensive stroke centers. A balanced cohort of consecutive patients with and without anterior circulation LVO was analyzed. Ground truth was based on concurrent CTA evaluated by site neuroradiologists. The primary outcome was predictive performance for LVO detection. The secondary outcomes were 1) prospective comparison of NCCT LVO detection against general radiologists and subspecialty neuroradiologists, and 2) the influence of NIHSS on the model.

Results: Triage Stroke software detected an LVO on NCCT with a 67% sensitivity and 93% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were 59% and 95%, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8. The software's sensitivity for LVO detection was significantly higher than the group average of all radiologists (difference = 20.5%; CI, 8.26-32.78; P = .001) and was also higher when separated into general and neuroradiology subgroups. The AUC for NCCT LVO was significantly higher than the group of all readers (difference = 11%; CI, 4%-17%; P < .001), and the nonexpert readers (difference = 13%, CI, 7%-20%; P < .001). The addition of NIHSS to the model yielded a high specificity (99%) and similar sensitivity (65%), resulting in the optimum positive predictive value of all models tested (91%).

Conclusions: Triage Stroke software demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for NCCT detection of anterior circulation LVOs outperforming radiologists. Coupled with NIHSS it may simplify identification of endovascular candidates especially in resource-constrained environments worldwide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信