Sofia Domeij , Ellie Sandberg Larsson , Mike Gilbert , Anders Rasmussen
{"title":"眨眼条件作用的物种间变异。","authors":"Sofia Domeij , Ellie Sandberg Larsson , Mike Gilbert , Anders Rasmussen","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A central assumption in neuroscience is that learning mechanisms are conserved across species. Eyeblink conditioning, a cornerstone paradigm for studying associative learning and cerebellar function, has been widely used in humans and animal models alike. Yet direct cross-species comparisons remain rare. In this systematic review, we analyzed 484 eyeblink conditioning experiments reported in 271 studies spanning humans, rabbits, rats, mice, as well as individual studies in other species. Our findings reveal consistent interspecies differences in acquisition rates, timing parameters, and stimulus protocols, with notable variation even within species. These results challenge the assumption of mechanistic equivalence across species and highlight the limitations of generalizing neural mechanisms from one species to another.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 106398"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interspecies variations in eyeblink conditioning\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Domeij , Ellie Sandberg Larsson , Mike Gilbert , Anders Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A central assumption in neuroscience is that learning mechanisms are conserved across species. Eyeblink conditioning, a cornerstone paradigm for studying associative learning and cerebellar function, has been widely used in humans and animal models alike. Yet direct cross-species comparisons remain rare. In this systematic review, we analyzed 484 eyeblink conditioning experiments reported in 271 studies spanning humans, rabbits, rats, mice, as well as individual studies in other species. Our findings reveal consistent interspecies differences in acquisition rates, timing parameters, and stimulus protocols, with notable variation even within species. These results challenge the assumption of mechanistic equivalence across species and highlight the limitations of generalizing neural mechanisms from one species to another.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"volume\":\"179 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425003999\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425003999","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A central assumption in neuroscience is that learning mechanisms are conserved across species. Eyeblink conditioning, a cornerstone paradigm for studying associative learning and cerebellar function, has been widely used in humans and animal models alike. Yet direct cross-species comparisons remain rare. In this systematic review, we analyzed 484 eyeblink conditioning experiments reported in 271 studies spanning humans, rabbits, rats, mice, as well as individual studies in other species. Our findings reveal consistent interspecies differences in acquisition rates, timing parameters, and stimulus protocols, with notable variation even within species. These results challenge the assumption of mechanistic equivalence across species and highlight the limitations of generalizing neural mechanisms from one species to another.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.