{"title":"社会经济地位和健康生活方式与老年人抑郁症状的关系:来自五项前瞻性队列研究的证据","authors":"Xinfeng Wang, Xin Ye, Yingyao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Depression is a common illness that may severely limit psychosocial functioning and diminish quality of life. The complex interplay between socioeconomic status (SES), lifestyle behaviors, and depression remains insufficiently elucidated. This study aimed to investigate whether healthy lifestyles mediate the relationship between SES and depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from five nationally representative cohort studies across 20 countries between 2008 and 2018: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), and the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA). SES was derived using latent class analysis of education, income, and wealth. A composite healthy lifestyle score, based on smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and social participation, categorized participants into unfavorable, intermediate, or favorable lifestyle groups. Depression was assessed using CES-D or EURO-D scales. Cox proportional hazards models, with random-effects models for pooling, were used to examine the association between SES and depressive symptoms. Causal mediation analysis evaluated the mediating roles of intermediate and unfavorable lifestyles in the SES-depression relationship. Analyses were conducted in 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 48,760 participants, 14,320 developed depressive symptoms. Low SES was associated with higher depression risk (pooled HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.37-1.45). Unfavorable lifestyle mediated 62.8% of the SES-depression association, and intermediate lifestyle mediated 6.0%. The highest risk was observed in those with both low SES and unfavorable lifestyle (pooled HR 2.47, 95% CI 2.34-2.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unfavorable lifestyle substantially mediated the association between low SES and depression, highlighting the importance of lifestyle interventions to reduce socioeconomic disparities. Country-level heterogeneity underscores the need for context-specific strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between socioeconomic status and healthy lifestyle with depressive symptoms in older adults: Evidence from five prospective cohort studies.\",\"authors\":\"Xinfeng Wang, Xin Ye, Yingyao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Depression is a common illness that may severely limit psychosocial functioning and diminish quality of life. The complex interplay between socioeconomic status (SES), lifestyle behaviors, and depression remains insufficiently elucidated. This study aimed to investigate whether healthy lifestyles mediate the relationship between SES and depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from five nationally representative cohort studies across 20 countries between 2008 and 2018: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), and the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA). SES was derived using latent class analysis of education, income, and wealth. A composite healthy lifestyle score, based on smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and social participation, categorized participants into unfavorable, intermediate, or favorable lifestyle groups. Depression was assessed using CES-D or EURO-D scales. Cox proportional hazards models, with random-effects models for pooling, were used to examine the association between SES and depressive symptoms. Causal mediation analysis evaluated the mediating roles of intermediate and unfavorable lifestyles in the SES-depression relationship. Analyses were conducted in 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 48,760 participants, 14,320 developed depressive symptoms. Low SES was associated with higher depression risk (pooled HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.37-1.45). Unfavorable lifestyle mediated 62.8% of the SES-depression association, and intermediate lifestyle mediated 6.0%. The highest risk was observed in those with both low SES and unfavorable lifestyle (pooled HR 2.47, 95% CI 2.34-2.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unfavorable lifestyle substantially mediated the association between low SES and depression, highlighting the importance of lifestyle interventions to reduce socioeconomic disparities. Country-level heterogeneity underscores the need for context-specific strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108138\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
抑郁症是一种常见病,可严重限制心理社会功能,降低生活质量。社会经济地位(SES)、生活方式行为和抑郁症之间复杂的相互作用尚未得到充分阐明。本研究旨在探讨健康的生活方式是否在社会经济地位与抑郁之间起到中介作用。方法:数据来自2008年至2018年间20个国家的5项具有全国代表性的队列研究:健康与退休研究(HRS)、英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)、欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)、中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)和韩国老龄化纵向研究(KLoSA)。SES是通过教育、收入和财富的潜在阶级分析得出的。基于吸烟、饮酒、体育活动和社会参与的综合健康生活方式评分将参与者分为不良、中等或良好的生活方式组。采用ce - d或EURO-D量表评估抑郁程度。采用Cox比例风险模型和随机效应模型进行合并,以检验SES与抑郁症状之间的关系。因果中介分析评估中间和不良生活方式在ses -抑郁关系中的中介作用。分析在2025年进行。结果:48760名参与者中,14320人出现抑郁症状。较低的社会经济地位与较高的抑郁风险相关(合并HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.37-1.45)。不良生活方式介导了ses -抑郁相关性的62.8%,中等生活方式介导了6.0%。在社会经济地位低和生活方式不良的人群中观察到最高的风险(总危险度2.47,95% CI 2.34-2.60)。结论:不良的生活方式在低社会经济地位和抑郁症之间起着重要的中介作用,强调了生活方式干预对减少社会经济差异的重要性。国家一级的异质性突出表明需要根据具体情况制定战略。
Association between socioeconomic status and healthy lifestyle with depressive symptoms in older adults: Evidence from five prospective cohort studies.
Introduction: Depression is a common illness that may severely limit psychosocial functioning and diminish quality of life. The complex interplay between socioeconomic status (SES), lifestyle behaviors, and depression remains insufficiently elucidated. This study aimed to investigate whether healthy lifestyles mediate the relationship between SES and depression.
Methods: Data were drawn from five nationally representative cohort studies across 20 countries between 2008 and 2018: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), and the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA). SES was derived using latent class analysis of education, income, and wealth. A composite healthy lifestyle score, based on smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and social participation, categorized participants into unfavorable, intermediate, or favorable lifestyle groups. Depression was assessed using CES-D or EURO-D scales. Cox proportional hazards models, with random-effects models for pooling, were used to examine the association between SES and depressive symptoms. Causal mediation analysis evaluated the mediating roles of intermediate and unfavorable lifestyles in the SES-depression relationship. Analyses were conducted in 2025.
Results: Of 48,760 participants, 14,320 developed depressive symptoms. Low SES was associated with higher depression risk (pooled HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.37-1.45). Unfavorable lifestyle mediated 62.8% of the SES-depression association, and intermediate lifestyle mediated 6.0%. The highest risk was observed in those with both low SES and unfavorable lifestyle (pooled HR 2.47, 95% CI 2.34-2.60).
Conclusions: Unfavorable lifestyle substantially mediated the association between low SES and depression, highlighting the importance of lifestyle interventions to reduce socioeconomic disparities. Country-level heterogeneity underscores the need for context-specific strategies.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.