重症监护室患者艰难梭菌感染的危险因素和结局。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Tingting Hou, Yifang Huang, Jinjun Jiang, Yuanlin Song, Shujing Chen
{"title":"重症监护室患者艰难梭菌感染的危险因素和结局。","authors":"Tingting Hou, Yifang Huang, Jinjun Jiang, Yuanlin Song, Shujing Chen","doi":"10.1111/crj.70130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in critically ill patients admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled adult patients who developed diarrhea during their stay in the RICU and underwent C. difficile toxin testing. Patients were stratified into two groups based on test results: CDI group and Clostridioides difficile-negative diarrhea (CDN) group. Risk factors for CDI and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of CDI in RICU patients was 8.3%. Compared with the CDN group, the CDI group had significantly lower PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (P/F) ratios (median 135 vs. 189 mmHg, p = 0.012) and higher rates of parenteral nutrition (83.78% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.012), vasopressor use (62.16% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.029), and analgesic administration (72.97% vs. 47.14%, p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis indicated that male sex was a risk factor for CDI (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.25-13.26; p = 0.02). The CDI group had a nonsignificantly higher 60-day mortality rate (35.14% vs. 34.29%; p = 0.976). Survivors of CDI patients exhibited better oxygenation (175.43 vs. 102.88 mmHg; p = 0.004) and lower SOFA scores (6.38 vs. 9.0; p = 0.017). No independent risk factors for mortality were identified. CDI patients had significantly longer RICU stays (median: 32 vs. 21.5 days, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, male sex was independently associated with an increased risk of CDI. Although CDI did not significantly affect 60-day mortality, it was linked to prolonged RICU hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"19 10","pages":"e70130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors and Outcomes of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Respiratory Intensive Care Unit Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Tingting Hou, Yifang Huang, Jinjun Jiang, Yuanlin Song, Shujing Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/crj.70130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in critically ill patients admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled adult patients who developed diarrhea during their stay in the RICU and underwent C. difficile toxin testing. Patients were stratified into two groups based on test results: CDI group and Clostridioides difficile-negative diarrhea (CDN) group. Risk factors for CDI and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of CDI in RICU patients was 8.3%. Compared with the CDN group, the CDI group had significantly lower PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (P/F) ratios (median 135 vs. 189 mmHg, p = 0.012) and higher rates of parenteral nutrition (83.78% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.012), vasopressor use (62.16% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.029), and analgesic administration (72.97% vs. 47.14%, p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis indicated that male sex was a risk factor for CDI (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.25-13.26; p = 0.02). The CDI group had a nonsignificantly higher 60-day mortality rate (35.14% vs. 34.29%; p = 0.976). Survivors of CDI patients exhibited better oxygenation (175.43 vs. 102.88 mmHg; p = 0.004) and lower SOFA scores (6.38 vs. 9.0; p = 0.017). No independent risk factors for mortality were identified. CDI patients had significantly longer RICU stays (median: 32 vs. 21.5 days, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, male sex was independently associated with an increased risk of CDI. Although CDI did not significantly affect 60-day mortality, it was linked to prolonged RICU hospitalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 10\",\"pages\":\"e70130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.70130\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.70130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性研究旨在探讨呼吸道重症监护病房(RICU)危重患者艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的危险因素及临床结局。方法:我们招募了在RICU住院期间出现腹泻并进行艰难梭菌毒素检测的成年患者。根据检测结果将患者分为CDI组和艰难梭菌阴性腹泻(CDN)组。比较两组CDI的危险因素和临床结果。结果:RICU患者CDI发生率为8.3%。与CDN组相比,CDI组PaO2/FiO2 (P/F)比值显著降低(中位数135比189 mmHg, P = 0.012),肠外营养(83.78%比60.0%,P = 0.012)、血管加压药(62.16%比40.0%,P = 0.029)和镇痛药(72.97%比47.14%,P = 0.01)的使用比例较高。多因素分析显示,男性是CDI的危险因素(OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.25-13.26; p = 0.02)。CDI组60天死亡率无显著性增高(35.14% vs. 34.29%; p = 0.976)。CDI患者的幸存者表现出更好的氧合(175.43比102.88 mmHg, p = 0.004)和更低的SOFA评分(6.38比9.0,p = 0.017)。未发现死亡的独立危险因素。CDI患者的RICU停留时间显著延长(中位数:32天vs. 21.5天,p = 0.02)。结论:在本研究中,男性与CDI风险增加独立相关。虽然CDI对60天死亡率没有显著影响,但它与RICU住院时间延长有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Respiratory Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in critically ill patients admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU).

Methods: We enrolled adult patients who developed diarrhea during their stay in the RICU and underwent C. difficile toxin testing. Patients were stratified into two groups based on test results: CDI group and Clostridioides difficile-negative diarrhea (CDN) group. Risk factors for CDI and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results: The incidence of CDI in RICU patients was 8.3%. Compared with the CDN group, the CDI group had significantly lower PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratios (median 135 vs. 189 mmHg, p = 0.012) and higher rates of parenteral nutrition (83.78% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.012), vasopressor use (62.16% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.029), and analgesic administration (72.97% vs. 47.14%, p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis indicated that male sex was a risk factor for CDI (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.25-13.26; p = 0.02). The CDI group had a nonsignificantly higher 60-day mortality rate (35.14% vs. 34.29%; p = 0.976). Survivors of CDI patients exhibited better oxygenation (175.43 vs. 102.88 mmHg; p = 0.004) and lower SOFA scores (6.38 vs. 9.0; p = 0.017). No independent risk factors for mortality were identified. CDI patients had significantly longer RICU stays (median: 32 vs. 21.5 days, p = 0.02).

Conclusion: In this study, male sex was independently associated with an increased risk of CDI. Although CDI did not significantly affect 60-day mortality, it was linked to prolonged RICU hospitalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Respiratory Journal
Clinical Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Overview Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format. Aims and Scope The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic. We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including: Asthma Allergy COPD Non-invasive ventilation Sleep related breathing disorders Interstitial lung diseases Lung cancer Clinical genetics Rhinitis Airway and lung infection Epidemiology Pediatrics CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies. Keywords Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease, Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Embase (Elsevier) Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest) HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell) Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SCOPUS (Elsevier)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信