营养不良和临床因素作为全髋关节置换术后延长住院时间的预测因素:一种预测Nomogram。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Zhen Wang, Zijian Chen, Jixi Liu, Chaoyi Zhang, Wenzheng Liu, Wei Lin, Guanglin Wang
{"title":"营养不良和临床因素作为全髋关节置换术后延长住院时间的预测因素:一种预测Nomogram。","authors":"Zhen Wang, Zijian Chen, Jixi Liu, Chaoyi Zhang, Wenzheng Liu, Wei Lin, Guanglin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extended lengths of stay (eLOS) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) increase healthcare costs and adverse outcomes. Nutritional status is important in postoperative recovery, but its impact on eLOS remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 805 THA patients, and the prolonged hospitalization group (PHG) was defined as a LOS ≥ 10 days. Nutritional status was evaluated using the controlling nutritional status (CONUT), geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) scores, and their predictive value for eLOS was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Independent predictors of eLOS in THA patients were identified using logistic regression analyses, upon which a nomogram was developed for risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PHG had significantly lower GNRI and PNI scores than the non-prolonged hospitalization group (NPHG) (P < 0.001), while CONUT scores showed no difference (P = 0.153). After adjusting for age and sex, GNRI (r = -0.195, P = 0.008) and PNI (r = -0.08, P = 0.024) were negatively correlated with eLOS. The ROC analysis indicated that GNRI had superior predictive accuracy for eLOS [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.643] compared to PNI, and combining multiple nutritional scores did not enhance predictive performance. Multivariate regression identified GNRI, HuaXi fall risk score (HXFS), age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), visual analog scale (VAS), and admission type as independent risk factors for eLOS (all P < 0.05). A nomogram incorporating these variables demonstrated the highest predictive value (AUC = 0.750) with a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 72.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GNRI score is an independent risk factor for eLOS in THA patients. A predictive model incorporating other variables demonstrated the highest diagnostic value, and the application of this model for the early identification of high-risk patients who have eLOS may facilitate targeted interventions, optimize preoperative management, and improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malnutrition and Clinical Factors as Predictors of Extended Hospital Stay After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Development of a Predictive Nomogram.\",\"authors\":\"Zhen Wang, Zijian Chen, Jixi Liu, Chaoyi Zhang, Wenzheng Liu, Wei Lin, Guanglin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extended lengths of stay (eLOS) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) increase healthcare costs and adverse outcomes. Nutritional status is important in postoperative recovery, but its impact on eLOS remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 805 THA patients, and the prolonged hospitalization group (PHG) was defined as a LOS ≥ 10 days. Nutritional status was evaluated using the controlling nutritional status (CONUT), geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) scores, and their predictive value for eLOS was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Independent predictors of eLOS in THA patients were identified using logistic regression analyses, upon which a nomogram was developed for risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PHG had significantly lower GNRI and PNI scores than the non-prolonged hospitalization group (NPHG) (P < 0.001), while CONUT scores showed no difference (P = 0.153). After adjusting for age and sex, GNRI (r = -0.195, P = 0.008) and PNI (r = -0.08, P = 0.024) were negatively correlated with eLOS. The ROC analysis indicated that GNRI had superior predictive accuracy for eLOS [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.643] compared to PNI, and combining multiple nutritional scores did not enhance predictive performance. Multivariate regression identified GNRI, HuaXi fall risk score (HXFS), age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), visual analog scale (VAS), and admission type as independent risk factors for eLOS (all P < 0.05). A nomogram incorporating these variables demonstrated the highest predictive value (AUC = 0.750) with a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 72.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GNRI score is an independent risk factor for eLOS in THA patients. A predictive model incorporating other variables demonstrated the highest diagnostic value, and the application of this model for the early identification of high-risk patients who have eLOS may facilitate targeted interventions, optimize preoperative management, and improve clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全髋关节置换术(THA)后延长的住院时间(eLOS)增加了医疗费用和不良后果。营养状况对术后恢复很重要,但其对eLOS的影响仍未得到充分探讨。方法:本研究纳入805例THA患者,延长住院时间组(PHG)定义为LOS≥10天。采用对照营养状况(CONUT)、老年营养风险指数(GNRI)和预后营养指数(PNI)评分评估营养状况,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估其对eLOS的预测价值。使用逻辑回归分析确定THA患者eLOS的独立预测因素,并在此基础上开发了用于风险预测的nomogram。结果:PHG组GNRI和PNI评分显著低于非延长住院组(NPHG) (P < 0.001), CONUT评分差异无统计学意义(P = 0.153)。在调整年龄和性别后,GNRI (r = -0.195, P = 0.008)和PNI (r = -0.08, P = 0.024)与eLOS呈负相关。ROC分析显示,与PNI相比,GNRI对eLOS[曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.643]的预测精度更高,而合并多种营养评分并不能提高预测性能。多因素回归发现GNRI、huxi跌倒风险评分(HXFS)、年龄校正Charlson合并症指数(ACCI)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和入院类型是eLOS的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。结合这些变量的nomogram显示出最高的预测值(AUC = 0.750),敏感性为71.4%,特异性为72.1%。结论:GNRI评分是THA患者eLOS的独立危险因素。结合其他变量的预测模型显示出最高的诊断价值,将该模型应用于eLOS高危患者的早期识别可以促进有针对性的干预,优化术前管理,改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Malnutrition and Clinical Factors as Predictors of Extended Hospital Stay After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Development of a Predictive Nomogram.

Background: Extended lengths of stay (eLOS) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) increase healthcare costs and adverse outcomes. Nutritional status is important in postoperative recovery, but its impact on eLOS remains underexplored.

Methods: This study included 805 THA patients, and the prolonged hospitalization group (PHG) was defined as a LOS ≥ 10 days. Nutritional status was evaluated using the controlling nutritional status (CONUT), geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) scores, and their predictive value for eLOS was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Independent predictors of eLOS in THA patients were identified using logistic regression analyses, upon which a nomogram was developed for risk prediction.

Results: The PHG had significantly lower GNRI and PNI scores than the non-prolonged hospitalization group (NPHG) (P < 0.001), while CONUT scores showed no difference (P = 0.153). After adjusting for age and sex, GNRI (r = -0.195, P = 0.008) and PNI (r = -0.08, P = 0.024) were negatively correlated with eLOS. The ROC analysis indicated that GNRI had superior predictive accuracy for eLOS [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.643] compared to PNI, and combining multiple nutritional scores did not enhance predictive performance. Multivariate regression identified GNRI, HuaXi fall risk score (HXFS), age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), visual analog scale (VAS), and admission type as independent risk factors for eLOS (all P < 0.05). A nomogram incorporating these variables demonstrated the highest predictive value (AUC = 0.750) with a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 72.1%.

Conclusions: The GNRI score is an independent risk factor for eLOS in THA patients. A predictive model incorporating other variables demonstrated the highest diagnostic value, and the application of this model for the early identification of high-risk patients who have eLOS may facilitate targeted interventions, optimize preoperative management, and improve clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信