竖脊肌平面阻滞与外科手术术中肋间神经阻滞在电视胸腔镜手术中的疗效比较:回顾性分析。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Soner Kına, Güntuğ Batıhan, Hüseyin Türkan, Yekta Bektaş
{"title":"竖脊肌平面阻滞与外科手术术中肋间神经阻滞在电视胸腔镜手术中的疗效比较:回顾性分析。","authors":"Soner Kına, Güntuğ Batıhan, Hüseyin Türkan, Yekta Bektaş","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03178-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) offers reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery, yet optimal analgesia remains essential. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane (ESP) block and intercostal nerve block (ICNB), are commonly employed. This study compares preoperative ESP block with surgeon-performed intraoperative ICNB in VATS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 82 patients (≥ 18 years; ASA I-III) underwent elective VATS between January 2020 and December 2022 were analyzed. Forty patients received a postoperative ESP block and 42 an intraoperative ICNB. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale, postoperative peak expiratory flow (PEF), postoperative IV opioid analgesic use, drainage time, and hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline demographics were similar. VAS scores were comparable at postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. At postoperative 48 h, the ICNB group had significantly lower VAS scores (4.17 ± 1.03 vs. 4.78 ± 1.03; p = 0.00987). No significant differences were observed in postoperative iv opioid analgesic use, drainage time or hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both techniques provide effective early analgesia in VATS, with ICNB showing prolonged pain relief. Further prospective studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus surgeon-performed intraoperative intercostal nerve block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Soner Kına, Güntuğ Batıhan, Hüseyin Türkan, Yekta Bektaş\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-025-03178-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) offers reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery, yet optimal analgesia remains essential. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane (ESP) block and intercostal nerve block (ICNB), are commonly employed. This study compares preoperative ESP block with surgeon-performed intraoperative ICNB in VATS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 82 patients (≥ 18 years; ASA I-III) underwent elective VATS between January 2020 and December 2022 were analyzed. Forty patients received a postoperative ESP block and 42 an intraoperative ICNB. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale, postoperative peak expiratory flow (PEF), postoperative IV opioid analgesic use, drainage time, and hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline demographics were similar. VAS scores were comparable at postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. At postoperative 48 h, the ICNB group had significantly lower VAS scores (4.17 ± 1.03 vs. 4.78 ± 1.03; p = 0.00987). No significant differences were observed in postoperative iv opioid analgesic use, drainage time or hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both techniques provide effective early analgesia in VATS, with ICNB showing prolonged pain relief. Further prospective studies are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03178-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03178-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)可以减少术后疼痛和更快的恢复,但最佳镇痛仍然是必不可少的。区域麻醉技术,如竖脊面阻滞(ESP)和肋间神经阻滞(ICNB),是常用的麻醉方法。本研究比较了VATS患者术前ESP阻滞与术中ICNB。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,分析了2020年1月至2022年12月期间接受选择性VATS的82例患者(≥18岁;ASA I-III)。40例患者术后接受ESP阻滞,42例患者术中接受ICNB。主要结局包括术后疼痛评分(视觉模拟量表)、术后呼气峰流量(PEF)、术后静脉注射阿片类镇痛药的使用、引流时间和住院时间。结果:基线人口统计学相似。术后1、3、6、12、24 h的VAS评分具有可比性。术后48 h, ICNB组VAS评分显著低于对照组(4.17±1.03∶4.78±1.03;p = 0.00987)。术后静脉阿片类镇痛药的使用、引流时间和住院时间均无显著差异。结论:两种技术均可提供有效的VATS早期镇痛,ICNB可延长疼痛缓解时间。进一步的前瞻性研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus surgeon-performed intraoperative intercostal nerve block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective analysis.

Background: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) offers reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery, yet optimal analgesia remains essential. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane (ESP) block and intercostal nerve block (ICNB), are commonly employed. This study compares preoperative ESP block with surgeon-performed intraoperative ICNB in VATS patients.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 82 patients (≥ 18 years; ASA I-III) underwent elective VATS between January 2020 and December 2022 were analyzed. Forty patients received a postoperative ESP block and 42 an intraoperative ICNB. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale, postoperative peak expiratory flow (PEF), postoperative IV opioid analgesic use, drainage time, and hospital length of stay.

Results: Baseline demographics were similar. VAS scores were comparable at postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. At postoperative 48 h, the ICNB group had significantly lower VAS scores (4.17 ± 1.03 vs. 4.78 ± 1.03; p = 0.00987). No significant differences were observed in postoperative iv opioid analgesic use, drainage time or hospital stay.

Conclusions: Both techniques provide effective early analgesia in VATS, with ICNB showing prolonged pain relief. Further prospective studies are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信