影响教师参与医学教育发展计划的因素:质性个案研究。

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Zohreh Khoshgoftar, Sheida Khaledian, Hamed Khani
{"title":"影响教师参与医学教育发展计划的因素:质性个案研究。","authors":"Zohreh Khoshgoftar, Sheida Khaledian, Hamed Khani","doi":"10.1177/23821205251384382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Faculty development plays a pivotal role in enhancing teaching, research, educational, and clinical leadership, as well as in fostering career and professional development, which helps improve medical education. Despite its importance, engagement in faculty development programs is roughly variable among educators. This study aimed to identify and explain the factors influencing the participation of basic and clinical science faculty members in an online medical education faculty development course at medical universities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in Iran between July 2022 and May 2023. Data were collected through an online qualitative survey and semi-structured telephone interviews with faculty members who were actively involved in or graduated from a virtual master's program in medical education. An online qualitative survey was first conducted with 86 participants in the faculty development program to obtain a wide understanding of their experiences. Subsequently, follow-up telephone interviews were conducted with faculty members who were engaged in the program to gain richer and deeper information, and this continued until data saturation was achieved (<i>N</i> = 8). All data were analyzed thematically to identify factors linked to faculty participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five major themes emerged: (1) professional and occupational factors, highlighting the importance of career advancement and job requirements; (2) individual factors, focusing on intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy; (3) social factors, reflecting the influence of peer support and social status; (4) educational and academic factors, emphasizing the necessity of innovative teaching methods; and (5) managerial/leadership and organizational factors, addressing the significance of institutional support and leadership in promoting development.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research provides valuable insights into the factors affecting faculty participation in development programs. By understanding these dynamics, educational institutions can consider initiatives (such as material and immaterial incentives, flexibility in program delivery, balancing teaching, research, and clinical service delivery, and promoting organizational culture and support) that enhance faculty engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251384382"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing Faculty Participation in Medical Education Development Programs: A Qualitative Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zohreh Khoshgoftar, Sheida Khaledian, Hamed Khani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23821205251384382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Faculty development plays a pivotal role in enhancing teaching, research, educational, and clinical leadership, as well as in fostering career and professional development, which helps improve medical education. Despite its importance, engagement in faculty development programs is roughly variable among educators. This study aimed to identify and explain the factors influencing the participation of basic and clinical science faculty members in an online medical education faculty development course at medical universities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in Iran between July 2022 and May 2023. Data were collected through an online qualitative survey and semi-structured telephone interviews with faculty members who were actively involved in or graduated from a virtual master's program in medical education. An online qualitative survey was first conducted with 86 participants in the faculty development program to obtain a wide understanding of their experiences. Subsequently, follow-up telephone interviews were conducted with faculty members who were engaged in the program to gain richer and deeper information, and this continued until data saturation was achieved (<i>N</i> = 8). All data were analyzed thematically to identify factors linked to faculty participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five major themes emerged: (1) professional and occupational factors, highlighting the importance of career advancement and job requirements; (2) individual factors, focusing on intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy; (3) social factors, reflecting the influence of peer support and social status; (4) educational and academic factors, emphasizing the necessity of innovative teaching methods; and (5) managerial/leadership and organizational factors, addressing the significance of institutional support and leadership in promoting development.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research provides valuable insights into the factors affecting faculty participation in development programs. By understanding these dynamics, educational institutions can consider initiatives (such as material and immaterial incentives, flexibility in program delivery, balancing teaching, research, and clinical service delivery, and promoting organizational culture and support) that enhance faculty engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"23821205251384382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504842/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251384382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251384382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:师资发展在加强教学、研究、教育和临床领导,以及促进职业和专业发展方面发挥着关键作用,有助于改善医学教育。尽管它很重要,但教育工作者对教师发展项目的参与程度大致不同。本研究旨在找出并解释影响医科大学基础及临床科学教师参与在线医学教育教师发展课程的因素。方法:本研究于2022年7月至2023年5月在伊朗进行。数据是通过在线定性调查和半结构化电话访谈收集的,访谈对象是积极参与或从医学教育虚拟硕士课程毕业的教师。首先对86名教师发展项目参与者进行了一项在线定性调查,以广泛了解他们的经历。随后,对参与该项目的教师进行了后续电话访谈,以获得更丰富、更深入的信息,直到达到数据饱和(N = 8)。所有数据都进行了主题分析,以确定与教师参与相关的因素。结果发现:主要有五大主题:(1)专业和职业因素,突出职业发展和工作要求的重要性;(2)个体因素,关注内在动机和自我效能;(3)社会因素,反映同伴支持和社会地位的影响;(4)教育与学术因素,强调创新教学方法的必要性;(5)管理/领导和组织因素,解决机构支持和领导在促进发展中的重要性。结论:本研究对影响教师参与发展项目的因素提供了有价值的见解。通过了解这些动态,教育机构可以考虑提高教师参与度的举措(如物质和非物质激励,项目交付的灵活性,平衡教学、研究和临床服务交付,以及促进组织文化和支持)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Influencing Faculty Participation in Medical Education Development Programs: A Qualitative Case Study.

Background and objectives: Faculty development plays a pivotal role in enhancing teaching, research, educational, and clinical leadership, as well as in fostering career and professional development, which helps improve medical education. Despite its importance, engagement in faculty development programs is roughly variable among educators. This study aimed to identify and explain the factors influencing the participation of basic and clinical science faculty members in an online medical education faculty development course at medical universities.

Methods: This study was conducted in Iran between July 2022 and May 2023. Data were collected through an online qualitative survey and semi-structured telephone interviews with faculty members who were actively involved in or graduated from a virtual master's program in medical education. An online qualitative survey was first conducted with 86 participants in the faculty development program to obtain a wide understanding of their experiences. Subsequently, follow-up telephone interviews were conducted with faculty members who were engaged in the program to gain richer and deeper information, and this continued until data saturation was achieved (N = 8). All data were analyzed thematically to identify factors linked to faculty participation.

Results: Five major themes emerged: (1) professional and occupational factors, highlighting the importance of career advancement and job requirements; (2) individual factors, focusing on intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy; (3) social factors, reflecting the influence of peer support and social status; (4) educational and academic factors, emphasizing the necessity of innovative teaching methods; and (5) managerial/leadership and organizational factors, addressing the significance of institutional support and leadership in promoting development.

Conclusion: This research provides valuable insights into the factors affecting faculty participation in development programs. By understanding these dynamics, educational institutions can consider initiatives (such as material and immaterial incentives, flexibility in program delivery, balancing teaching, research, and clinical service delivery, and promoting organizational culture and support) that enhance faculty engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信