Kea鹦鹉和人类儿童的认知好奇心。

Q1 Social Sciences
Open Mind Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/OPMI.a.34
Gabriella E Smith, Megan L Lambert, Eliza Swindell, Jan M Engelmann, Christoph J Völter
{"title":"Kea鹦鹉和人类儿童的认知好奇心。","authors":"Gabriella E Smith, Megan L Lambert, Eliza Swindell, Jan M Engelmann, Christoph J Völter","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both human children and animals seek information following a violation-of-expectation event, but little research suggests the latter do so for the sake of it. In this preregistered experiment, we compared epistemic curiosity-the pursuit of information for its own sake-in kea parrots (<i>Nestor notabilis</i>) and three-year-old human children (<i>Homo sapiens</i>) following a violation-of-expectation event. Subjects were trained to push a tool into an apparatus that produced a reward before the apparatus was surreptitiously made non-functional in following trials. In both functional and non-functional trials, after solving the task, subjects were rewarded and allowed to explore the apparatus for thirty seconds with the opportunity to peek into the side of the apparatus. We found that relatively more kea peeked than children, but the children and not the kea were significantly more likely to peek in the non-functional versus functional trials, particularly when the researcher was absent. While both species showed markers of curiosity in the experiment, we found expectancy-violation-induced epistemic curiosity only in the children and not the kea in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"1528-1542"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistemic Curiosity in Kea Parrots and Human Children.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriella E Smith, Megan L Lambert, Eliza Swindell, Jan M Engelmann, Christoph J Völter\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/OPMI.a.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Both human children and animals seek information following a violation-of-expectation event, but little research suggests the latter do so for the sake of it. In this preregistered experiment, we compared epistemic curiosity-the pursuit of information for its own sake-in kea parrots (<i>Nestor notabilis</i>) and three-year-old human children (<i>Homo sapiens</i>) following a violation-of-expectation event. Subjects were trained to push a tool into an apparatus that produced a reward before the apparatus was surreptitiously made non-functional in following trials. In both functional and non-functional trials, after solving the task, subjects were rewarded and allowed to explore the apparatus for thirty seconds with the opportunity to peek into the side of the apparatus. We found that relatively more kea peeked than children, but the children and not the kea were significantly more likely to peek in the non-functional versus functional trials, particularly when the researcher was absent. While both species showed markers of curiosity in the experiment, we found expectancy-violation-induced epistemic curiosity only in the children and not the kea in this context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Mind\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"1528-1542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506928/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Mind\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/OPMI.a.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/OPMI.a.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类的孩子和动物都会在违反预期事件后寻找信息,但很少有研究表明后者会为了信息而这样做。在这个预先注册的实验中,我们比较了kea鹦鹉(Nestor notabilis)和三岁的人类儿童(智人)在违反预期事件后的认知好奇心(为信息本身而追求信息)。在接下来的试验中,实验对象被训练将一个工具推入一个产生奖励的装置,然后这个装置被秘密地关闭。在功能性和非功能性试验中,在完成任务后,受试者都得到奖励,允许他们探索仪器30秒,并有机会窥视仪器的侧面。我们发现,相对而言,kea偷看的人比儿童多,但在非功能试验和功能试验中,儿童而不是kea偷看的可能性要大得多,尤其是在研究人员缺席的情况下。虽然这两个物种在实验中都表现出好奇心的标记,但我们发现,在这种情况下,期望违反引起的认知好奇心只在儿童中存在,而在这种情况下,kea没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Epistemic Curiosity in Kea Parrots and Human Children.

Epistemic Curiosity in Kea Parrots and Human Children.

Epistemic Curiosity in Kea Parrots and Human Children.

Epistemic Curiosity in Kea Parrots and Human Children.

Both human children and animals seek information following a violation-of-expectation event, but little research suggests the latter do so for the sake of it. In this preregistered experiment, we compared epistemic curiosity-the pursuit of information for its own sake-in kea parrots (Nestor notabilis) and three-year-old human children (Homo sapiens) following a violation-of-expectation event. Subjects were trained to push a tool into an apparatus that produced a reward before the apparatus was surreptitiously made non-functional in following trials. In both functional and non-functional trials, after solving the task, subjects were rewarded and allowed to explore the apparatus for thirty seconds with the opportunity to peek into the side of the apparatus. We found that relatively more kea peeked than children, but the children and not the kea were significantly more likely to peek in the non-functional versus functional trials, particularly when the researcher was absent. While both species showed markers of curiosity in the experiment, we found expectancy-violation-induced epistemic curiosity only in the children and not the kea in this context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信