局部扩张和扩张在神经外科手术中确定胸主动脉瘤决定因素的重要性。

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
PLoS Computational Biology Pub Date : 2025-10-09 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013550
David S Li, Somdatta Goswami, Qianying Cao, Vivek Oommen, Roland Assi, Jay D Humphrey, George E Karniadakis
{"title":"局部扩张和扩张在神经外科手术中确定胸主动脉瘤决定因素的重要性。","authors":"David S Li, Somdatta Goswami, Qianying Cao, Vivek Oommen, Roland Assi, Jay D Humphrey, George E Karniadakis","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) stem from diverse mechanical and mechanobiological disruptions to the aortic wall that can also increase the risk of dissection or rupture. There is increasing evidence that dysfunctions along the aortic mechanotransduction axis, including reduced integrity of elastic fibers and loss of cell-matrix connections, are particularly capable of causing thoracic aortopathy. Because different insults can produce distinct mechanical vulnerabilities, there is a pressing need to identify interacting factors that drive progression. In this work, we employ a finite element framework to generate synthetic TAAs arising from hundreds of heterogeneous insults that span a range of compromised elastic fiber integrity and cellular mechanosensing. From these simulations, we construct localized dilatation and distensibility maps throughout the aortic domain to serve as training data for neural network models to predict the initiating combined insult. Several candidate architectures (Deep Operator Networks, UNets, and Laplace Neural Operators) and input data formats are compared to establish a standard for handling future subject-specific information. We further quantify the predictive capability when networks are trained on geometric (dilatation) information alone, which mimics current clinical guidelines, versus training on both geometric and mechanical (distensibility) information. We show that prediction errors based on dilatation data are significantly higher than those based on dilatation and distensibility across all networks considered, highlighting the benefit of obtaining local distensibility measures in TAA assessment. Additionally, we identify UNet as the best-performing architecture across all training data formats. These findings demonstrate the importance of obtaining full-field measurements of both dilatation and distensibility in the aneurysmal aorta to identify the mechanobiological insults that drive disease progression, which will advance personalized treatment strategies that target the underlying pathologic mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":20241,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Computational Biology","volume":"21 10","pages":"e1013550"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of localized dilatation and distensibility in identifying determinants of thoracic aortic aneurysm with neural operators.\",\"authors\":\"David S Li, Somdatta Goswami, Qianying Cao, Vivek Oommen, Roland Assi, Jay D Humphrey, George E Karniadakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) stem from diverse mechanical and mechanobiological disruptions to the aortic wall that can also increase the risk of dissection or rupture. There is increasing evidence that dysfunctions along the aortic mechanotransduction axis, including reduced integrity of elastic fibers and loss of cell-matrix connections, are particularly capable of causing thoracic aortopathy. Because different insults can produce distinct mechanical vulnerabilities, there is a pressing need to identify interacting factors that drive progression. In this work, we employ a finite element framework to generate synthetic TAAs arising from hundreds of heterogeneous insults that span a range of compromised elastic fiber integrity and cellular mechanosensing. From these simulations, we construct localized dilatation and distensibility maps throughout the aortic domain to serve as training data for neural network models to predict the initiating combined insult. Several candidate architectures (Deep Operator Networks, UNets, and Laplace Neural Operators) and input data formats are compared to establish a standard for handling future subject-specific information. We further quantify the predictive capability when networks are trained on geometric (dilatation) information alone, which mimics current clinical guidelines, versus training on both geometric and mechanical (distensibility) information. We show that prediction errors based on dilatation data are significantly higher than those based on dilatation and distensibility across all networks considered, highlighting the benefit of obtaining local distensibility measures in TAA assessment. Additionally, we identify UNet as the best-performing architecture across all training data formats. These findings demonstrate the importance of obtaining full-field measurements of both dilatation and distensibility in the aneurysmal aorta to identify the mechanobiological insults that drive disease progression, which will advance personalized treatment strategies that target the underlying pathologic mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Computational Biology\",\"volume\":\"21 10\",\"pages\":\"e1013550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520381/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Computational Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013550\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013550","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胸主动脉瘤(TAAs)起源于对主动脉壁的各种机械和机械生物学破坏,也会增加夹层或破裂的风险。越来越多的证据表明,沿主动脉机械转导轴的功能障碍,包括弹性纤维完整性降低和细胞-基质连接丧失,特别容易引起胸主动脉病变。由于不同的侮辱会产生不同的机械脆弱性,因此迫切需要确定推动进展的相互作用因素。在这项工作中,我们采用有限元框架来生成由数百种异质损伤引起的合成TAAs,这些损伤跨越了弹性纤维完整性和细胞机械传感的范围。从这些模拟中,我们构建了整个主动脉区域的局部扩张和扩张图,作为神经网络模型预测初始联合损伤的训练数据。几个候选架构(深度算子网络,unet和拉普拉斯神经算子)和输入数据格式进行比较,以建立处理未来特定主题信息的标准。我们进一步量化了当网络只训练几何(扩张)信息时的预测能力,这模仿了当前的临床指南,而不是同时训练几何和机械(扩张)信息。我们发现,在所有考虑的网络中,基于扩张数据的预测误差明显高于基于扩张和扩张率的预测误差,这突出了在TAA评估中获得局部扩张率测量的好处。此外,我们认为UNet是所有训练数据格式中性能最好的架构。这些发现证明了获得动脉瘤主动脉扩张和扩张的全视野测量对于识别驱动疾病进展的机械生物学损伤的重要性,这将推进针对潜在病理机制的个性化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Importance of localized dilatation and distensibility in identifying determinants of thoracic aortic aneurysm with neural operators.

Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) stem from diverse mechanical and mechanobiological disruptions to the aortic wall that can also increase the risk of dissection or rupture. There is increasing evidence that dysfunctions along the aortic mechanotransduction axis, including reduced integrity of elastic fibers and loss of cell-matrix connections, are particularly capable of causing thoracic aortopathy. Because different insults can produce distinct mechanical vulnerabilities, there is a pressing need to identify interacting factors that drive progression. In this work, we employ a finite element framework to generate synthetic TAAs arising from hundreds of heterogeneous insults that span a range of compromised elastic fiber integrity and cellular mechanosensing. From these simulations, we construct localized dilatation and distensibility maps throughout the aortic domain to serve as training data for neural network models to predict the initiating combined insult. Several candidate architectures (Deep Operator Networks, UNets, and Laplace Neural Operators) and input data formats are compared to establish a standard for handling future subject-specific information. We further quantify the predictive capability when networks are trained on geometric (dilatation) information alone, which mimics current clinical guidelines, versus training on both geometric and mechanical (distensibility) information. We show that prediction errors based on dilatation data are significantly higher than those based on dilatation and distensibility across all networks considered, highlighting the benefit of obtaining local distensibility measures in TAA assessment. Additionally, we identify UNet as the best-performing architecture across all training data formats. These findings demonstrate the importance of obtaining full-field measurements of both dilatation and distensibility in the aneurysmal aorta to identify the mechanobiological insults that drive disease progression, which will advance personalized treatment strategies that target the underlying pathologic mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Computational Biology
PLoS Computational Biology BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
820
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales—from molecules and cells, to patient populations and ecosystems—through the application of computational methods. Readers include life and computational scientists, who can take the important findings presented here to the next level of discovery. Research articles must be declared as belonging to a relevant section. More information about the sections can be found in the submission guidelines. Research articles should model aspects of biological systems, demonstrate both methodological and scientific novelty, and provide profound new biological insights. Generally, reliability and significance of biological discovery through computation should be validated and enriched by experimental studies. Inclusion of experimental validation is not required for publication, but should be referenced where possible. Inclusion of experimental validation of a modest biological discovery through computation does not render a manuscript suitable for PLOS Computational Biology. Research articles specifically designated as Methods papers should describe outstanding methods of exceptional importance that have been shown, or have the promise to provide new biological insights. The method must already be widely adopted, or have the promise of wide adoption by a broad community of users. Enhancements to existing published methods will only be considered if those enhancements bring exceptional new capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信