持续使用阿米卡星脂质体吸入混悬液与难治性鸟分枝杆菌复杂肺病住院和急诊就诊风险降低相关

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kevin L Winthrop, Catherine Waweru, Emily Welch, Ping Wang, Leona E Markson
{"title":"持续使用阿米卡星脂质体吸入混悬液与难治性鸟分枝杆菌复杂肺病住院和急诊就诊风险降低相关","authors":"Kevin L Winthrop, Catherine Waweru, Emily Welch, Ping Wang, Leona E Markson","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) as add-on treatment to a multidrug regimen is the only therapy approved for treatment of adults with refractory Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease (rMACLD). Data on the impact of persistent use of ALIS on patient outcomes may be informative during clinical decision making. We used claims data to examine the association between persistent use of ALIS and healthcare resource use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used the Merative® MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. Patients who initiated ALIS between October 2018 and March 2021, with ≥3 months continuous enrollment before and ≥12 months after index (ie, date of first ALIS prescription) were included. ALIS use was stratified into two groups: persistent ALIS use (≥6 months total supply) and less persistent ALIS use (<6 months total supply) over a 12-month post-index period. Hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits between ALIS-use groups were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 103 ALIS-treated patients were included, with 54 (52.4%) and 49 (47.6%) in the persistent and less persistent ALIS-use groups, respectively. Compared with the less persistent ALIS-use group, the persistent ALIS-use group had a lower risk of all-cause (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.17 [0.07-0.40], p<0.0001), respiratory-related (0.16 [0.06-0.40], p<0.0001), and NTM-related hospitalizations (0.14 [0.05-0.38], p<0.0001), and ER visits (0.41 [0.18-0.92], p=0.03), based on multivariate modeling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persistent use of ALIS during the first 12 months of treatment was associated with a lower risk of hospitalizations and ER visits.</p><p><strong>Notation of prior abstract publication/presentation: </strong>Part of this study has been presented at CHEST on October 6-9, 2024, in Boston, MA, USA, and AMCP Nexus on October 14-17, 2024, in Las Vegas, NV, USA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108406"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persistent use of amikacin liposome inhalation suspension associated with lower risk of hospitalizations and emergency room visits in refractory Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin L Winthrop, Catherine Waweru, Emily Welch, Ping Wang, Leona E Markson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) as add-on treatment to a multidrug regimen is the only therapy approved for treatment of adults with refractory Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease (rMACLD). Data on the impact of persistent use of ALIS on patient outcomes may be informative during clinical decision making. We used claims data to examine the association between persistent use of ALIS and healthcare resource use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used the Merative® MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. Patients who initiated ALIS between October 2018 and March 2021, with ≥3 months continuous enrollment before and ≥12 months after index (ie, date of first ALIS prescription) were included. ALIS use was stratified into two groups: persistent ALIS use (≥6 months total supply) and less persistent ALIS use (<6 months total supply) over a 12-month post-index period. Hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits between ALIS-use groups were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 103 ALIS-treated patients were included, with 54 (52.4%) and 49 (47.6%) in the persistent and less persistent ALIS-use groups, respectively. Compared with the less persistent ALIS-use group, the persistent ALIS-use group had a lower risk of all-cause (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.17 [0.07-0.40], p<0.0001), respiratory-related (0.16 [0.06-0.40], p<0.0001), and NTM-related hospitalizations (0.14 [0.05-0.38], p<0.0001), and ER visits (0.41 [0.18-0.92], p=0.03), based on multivariate modeling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persistent use of ALIS during the first 12 months of treatment was associated with a lower risk of hospitalizations and ER visits.</p><p><strong>Notation of prior abstract publication/presentation: </strong>Part of this study has been presented at CHEST on October 6-9, 2024, in Boston, MA, USA, and AMCP Nexus on October 14-17, 2024, in Las Vegas, NV, USA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108406\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108406","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿米卡星脂质体吸入混悬液(ALIS)作为多药方案的附加治疗是唯一被批准用于治疗成人难治性鸟分枝杆菌复杂肺部疾病(rMACLD)的治疗方法。持续使用ALIS对患者预后影响的数据可能在临床决策过程中提供信息。我们使用索赔数据来检验持续使用ALIS与医疗资源使用之间的关系。方法:本回顾性研究使用了Merative®MarketScan商业和Medicare补充数据库。纳入在2018年10月至2021年3月期间开始使用ALIS的患者,在索引前连续入组≥3个月,在索引后连续入组≥12个月(即首次使用ALIS处方的日期)。ALIS的使用分为持续使用(总供应≥6个月)和不太持续使用(结果:共纳入103例ALIS治疗患者,持续使用和不太持续使用ALIS组分别为54例(52.4%)和49例(47.6%)。与不太持续使用ALIS组相比,持续使用ALIS组的全因风险较低(危险比[95% CI], 0.17[0.07-0.40])。结论:在治疗的前12个月持续使用ALIS与较低的住院和急诊风险相关。先前摘要发表/报告注释:本研究的部分内容已于2024年10月6日至9日在美国马萨诸塞州波士顿举行的CHEST会议和2024年10月14日至17日在美国内华达州拉斯维加斯举行的AMCP Nexus会议上发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Persistent use of amikacin liposome inhalation suspension associated with lower risk of hospitalizations and emergency room visits in refractory Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease.

Background: Amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) as add-on treatment to a multidrug regimen is the only therapy approved for treatment of adults with refractory Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease (rMACLD). Data on the impact of persistent use of ALIS on patient outcomes may be informative during clinical decision making. We used claims data to examine the association between persistent use of ALIS and healthcare resource use.

Methods: This retrospective study used the Merative® MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. Patients who initiated ALIS between October 2018 and March 2021, with ≥3 months continuous enrollment before and ≥12 months after index (ie, date of first ALIS prescription) were included. ALIS use was stratified into two groups: persistent ALIS use (≥6 months total supply) and less persistent ALIS use (<6 months total supply) over a 12-month post-index period. Hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits between ALIS-use groups were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: In total, 103 ALIS-treated patients were included, with 54 (52.4%) and 49 (47.6%) in the persistent and less persistent ALIS-use groups, respectively. Compared with the less persistent ALIS-use group, the persistent ALIS-use group had a lower risk of all-cause (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.17 [0.07-0.40], p<0.0001), respiratory-related (0.16 [0.06-0.40], p<0.0001), and NTM-related hospitalizations (0.14 [0.05-0.38], p<0.0001), and ER visits (0.41 [0.18-0.92], p=0.03), based on multivariate modeling.

Conclusions: Persistent use of ALIS during the first 12 months of treatment was associated with a lower risk of hospitalizations and ER visits.

Notation of prior abstract publication/presentation: Part of this study has been presented at CHEST on October 6-9, 2024, in Boston, MA, USA, and AMCP Nexus on October 14-17, 2024, in Las Vegas, NV, USA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信