强化课程对资优学生认知和情感技能的影响:一项元分析。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-10-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0333714
M Davut Gül, Zekai Ayık
{"title":"强化课程对资优学生认知和情感技能的影响:一项元分析。","authors":"M Davut Gül, Zekai Ayık","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0333714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis aims to study research on enrichment programs for gifted students and synthesize the effects on cognitive and affective skills reported by studies conducted between 2014-2024 years. During the screening process, the focus was on quantitative studies published between 2014 and 2024 that explored the influence of enrichment programs (ER) on cognitive and affective abilities of gifted students. Searches were carried out in Web of Science and Scopus databases for publications in English. The researchers examined publication bias by analysing data using various methods, including the funnel plot, Begg's test, Egger's test, and trim-and-fill test. Additionally, the researchers utilized Classic fail-safe N and Orwin's fail-safe N values for further analysis. Hedges's g was used to report the magnitude or strength of the standardized mean differences between groups in a study as effect size, since it provides effect size for smaller sample sizes. A total of 16 publications included in this meta-analysis, and results demonstrated that enrichment programs had a large effect on cognitive skills (g = 1.14, 95% CI [.83, 1.45], under random-effect model), a medium effect on affective personal skills (g = .51, 95% CI [.30,.73], under random-effect model), and small impact on affective social skills (g = .44, 95% CI [.23,.66], under random-effect model). This review underscores nuanced findings focusing on sub-domains of achievement, higher-order thinking, and personal and social-affective skills. The overall results implied that enrichment programs play a significant role in fulfilling both the cognitive and non-cognitive needs of gifted students.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 10","pages":"e0333714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of enrichment programs on cognitive and affective skills of gifted students: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"M Davut Gül, Zekai Ayık\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0333714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This meta-analysis aims to study research on enrichment programs for gifted students and synthesize the effects on cognitive and affective skills reported by studies conducted between 2014-2024 years. During the screening process, the focus was on quantitative studies published between 2014 and 2024 that explored the influence of enrichment programs (ER) on cognitive and affective abilities of gifted students. Searches were carried out in Web of Science and Scopus databases for publications in English. The researchers examined publication bias by analysing data using various methods, including the funnel plot, Begg's test, Egger's test, and trim-and-fill test. Additionally, the researchers utilized Classic fail-safe N and Orwin's fail-safe N values for further analysis. Hedges's g was used to report the magnitude or strength of the standardized mean differences between groups in a study as effect size, since it provides effect size for smaller sample sizes. A total of 16 publications included in this meta-analysis, and results demonstrated that enrichment programs had a large effect on cognitive skills (g = 1.14, 95% CI [.83, 1.45], under random-effect model), a medium effect on affective personal skills (g = .51, 95% CI [.30,.73], under random-effect model), and small impact on affective social skills (g = .44, 95% CI [.23,.66], under random-effect model). This review underscores nuanced findings focusing on sub-domains of achievement, higher-order thinking, and personal and social-affective skills. The overall results implied that enrichment programs play a significant role in fulfilling both the cognitive and non-cognitive needs of gifted students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"e0333714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510610/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333714\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本荟萃分析旨在研究资优学生强化计划的研究,并综合2014-2024年间的研究报告对认知和情感技能的影响。在筛选过程中,重点是2014年至2024年间发表的定量研究,这些研究探讨了强化计划(ER)对资优学生认知和情感能力的影响。在Web of Science和Scopus数据库中检索英文出版物。研究人员通过使用各种方法分析数据来检验发表偏倚,包括漏斗图、贝格检验、埃格检验和填充检验。此外,研究人员利用经典故障安全N和Orwin的故障安全N值进行进一步分析。Hedges’s g用于报告研究中各组间标准化平均差异的大小或强度作为效应量,因为它提供了较小样本量的效应量。该荟萃分析共纳入了16篇出版物,结果表明,强化计划对认知技能有很大影响(g = 1.14, 95% CI)。83, 1.45],在随机效应模型下),情感个人技能有中等效应(g =。51, 95% ci[.30,。[73],在随机效应模型下),对情感社交技能的影响较小(g =。44, 95% ci[.23,。[66],在随机效应模型下)。这篇综述强调了专注于成就、高阶思维、个人和社会情感技能等子领域的细微发现。研究结果表明,强化课程在满足资优学生的认知和非认知需求方面都发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacts of enrichment programs on cognitive and affective skills of gifted students: A meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aims to study research on enrichment programs for gifted students and synthesize the effects on cognitive and affective skills reported by studies conducted between 2014-2024 years. During the screening process, the focus was on quantitative studies published between 2014 and 2024 that explored the influence of enrichment programs (ER) on cognitive and affective abilities of gifted students. Searches were carried out in Web of Science and Scopus databases for publications in English. The researchers examined publication bias by analysing data using various methods, including the funnel plot, Begg's test, Egger's test, and trim-and-fill test. Additionally, the researchers utilized Classic fail-safe N and Orwin's fail-safe N values for further analysis. Hedges's g was used to report the magnitude or strength of the standardized mean differences between groups in a study as effect size, since it provides effect size for smaller sample sizes. A total of 16 publications included in this meta-analysis, and results demonstrated that enrichment programs had a large effect on cognitive skills (g = 1.14, 95% CI [.83, 1.45], under random-effect model), a medium effect on affective personal skills (g = .51, 95% CI [.30,.73], under random-effect model), and small impact on affective social skills (g = .44, 95% CI [.23,.66], under random-effect model). This review underscores nuanced findings focusing on sub-domains of achievement, higher-order thinking, and personal and social-affective skills. The overall results implied that enrichment programs play a significant role in fulfilling both the cognitive and non-cognitive needs of gifted students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信