甜味刺激诱导人类不同程度的头期胰岛素释放。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Alexa J Pullicin, Juyun Lim
{"title":"甜味刺激诱导人类不同程度的头期胰岛素释放。","authors":"Alexa J Pullicin, Juyun Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous work has shown that oral stimulation with glucose and glucose-containing carbohydrates induces cephalic phase insulin release (CPIR), and that inhibiting the sweet taste receptor, T1R2+T1R3, attenuates this effect in humans. It remains unclear whether perceived sweet taste in the absence of glucose is sufficient to elicit CPIR. To address this, we measured CPIR following oral exposure to glucose and two non-glucose-containing sweet stimuli, fructose and sucralose. Healthy adults (N = 28) attended three sessions where blood samples were collected before and after stimulation with one of the sweeteners. Concentrations of plasma insulin and c-peptide-a surrogate marker co-secreted with insulin in equimolar amounts-were analyzed to assess the response. While glucose and fructose stimulation elicited significant increases in c-peptide and insulin from baseline at 2 minutes (one-sample t-test, all p < 0.05), sucralose, on average, induced only a trending or non-significant increase (c-peptide, p = 0.08; insulin, p > 0.10). However, when participants' highest (peak) Δ c-peptide and Δ insulin values were considered, all three stimuli produced significant increases in both markers (all p < 0.005 for c-peptide and insulin). Furthermore, repeated measures ANOVA consistently showed no significant effect of stimulus across all metrics considered-post-stimulation Δ, highest Δ, or AUC values (all p > 0.05)-indicating the three stimuli produced comparable responses across individuals. Notably, individual-level data revealed marked variability in both time course and magnitude of CPIR across all stimuli. These findings indicate that tasting sweet stimuli can trigger CPIR in humans, but its expression varies considerably across individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":20201,"journal":{"name":"Physiology & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"115123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sweet stimuli induce cephalic phase insulin release to varying degrees in humans.\",\"authors\":\"Alexa J Pullicin, Juyun Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous work has shown that oral stimulation with glucose and glucose-containing carbohydrates induces cephalic phase insulin release (CPIR), and that inhibiting the sweet taste receptor, T1R2+T1R3, attenuates this effect in humans. It remains unclear whether perceived sweet taste in the absence of glucose is sufficient to elicit CPIR. To address this, we measured CPIR following oral exposure to glucose and two non-glucose-containing sweet stimuli, fructose and sucralose. Healthy adults (N = 28) attended three sessions where blood samples were collected before and after stimulation with one of the sweeteners. Concentrations of plasma insulin and c-peptide-a surrogate marker co-secreted with insulin in equimolar amounts-were analyzed to assess the response. While glucose and fructose stimulation elicited significant increases in c-peptide and insulin from baseline at 2 minutes (one-sample t-test, all p < 0.05), sucralose, on average, induced only a trending or non-significant increase (c-peptide, p = 0.08; insulin, p > 0.10). However, when participants' highest (peak) Δ c-peptide and Δ insulin values were considered, all three stimuli produced significant increases in both markers (all p < 0.005 for c-peptide and insulin). Furthermore, repeated measures ANOVA consistently showed no significant effect of stimulus across all metrics considered-post-stimulation Δ, highest Δ, or AUC values (all p > 0.05)-indicating the three stimuli produced comparable responses across individuals. Notably, individual-level data revealed marked variability in both time course and magnitude of CPIR across all stimuli. These findings indicate that tasting sweet stimuli can trigger CPIR in humans, but its expression varies considerably across individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiology & Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"115123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiology & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,口服葡萄糖和含葡萄糖碳水化合物刺激可诱导头期胰岛素释放(CPIR),而抑制甜味受体T1R2+T1R3可减弱这一作用。目前尚不清楚在没有葡萄糖的情况下感知到的甜味是否足以引发CPIR。为了解决这个问题,我们测量了口服葡萄糖和两种不含葡萄糖的甜味刺激(果糖和三氯蔗糖)后的CPIR。健康成人(N = 28)参加了三次试验,在其中一种甜味剂刺激前后采集血液样本。分析血浆胰岛素和c肽(一种与胰岛素共分泌等摩尔量的替代标志物)的浓度来评估反应。葡萄糖和果糖刺激在2分钟时诱导c肽和胰岛素较基线显著增加(单样本t检验,均p < 0.05),而三氯蔗糖平均仅诱导呈趋势或无显著增加(c肽,p = 0.08;胰岛素,p > 0.10)。然而,当考虑到参与者的最高(峰值)Δ c肽和Δ胰岛素值时,所有三种刺激都显著增加了这两种标志物(c肽和胰岛素的p均< 0.005)。此外,重复测量方差分析一致显示刺激在所有考虑的指标中没有显著影响-刺激后Δ,最高Δ或AUC值(均p > 0.05)-表明三种刺激在个体之间产生可比反应。值得注意的是,个人水平的数据显示,在所有刺激中,CPIR的时间过程和大小都有显著的变化。这些发现表明,品尝甜味刺激可以触发人类的CPIR,但其表达在个体之间差异很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sweet stimuli induce cephalic phase insulin release to varying degrees in humans.

Previous work has shown that oral stimulation with glucose and glucose-containing carbohydrates induces cephalic phase insulin release (CPIR), and that inhibiting the sweet taste receptor, T1R2+T1R3, attenuates this effect in humans. It remains unclear whether perceived sweet taste in the absence of glucose is sufficient to elicit CPIR. To address this, we measured CPIR following oral exposure to glucose and two non-glucose-containing sweet stimuli, fructose and sucralose. Healthy adults (N = 28) attended three sessions where blood samples were collected before and after stimulation with one of the sweeteners. Concentrations of plasma insulin and c-peptide-a surrogate marker co-secreted with insulin in equimolar amounts-were analyzed to assess the response. While glucose and fructose stimulation elicited significant increases in c-peptide and insulin from baseline at 2 minutes (one-sample t-test, all p < 0.05), sucralose, on average, induced only a trending or non-significant increase (c-peptide, p = 0.08; insulin, p > 0.10). However, when participants' highest (peak) Δ c-peptide and Δ insulin values were considered, all three stimuli produced significant increases in both markers (all p < 0.005 for c-peptide and insulin). Furthermore, repeated measures ANOVA consistently showed no significant effect of stimulus across all metrics considered-post-stimulation Δ, highest Δ, or AUC values (all p > 0.05)-indicating the three stimuli produced comparable responses across individuals. Notably, individual-level data revealed marked variability in both time course and magnitude of CPIR across all stimuli. These findings indicate that tasting sweet stimuli can trigger CPIR in humans, but its expression varies considerably across individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiology & Behavior
Physiology & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
274
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Physiology & Behavior is aimed at the causal physiological mechanisms of behavior and its modulation by environmental factors. The journal invites original reports in the broad area of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, in which at least one variable is physiological and the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. The range of subjects includes behavioral neuroendocrinology, psychoneuroimmunology, learning and memory, ingestion, social behavior, and studies related to the mechanisms of psychopathology. Contemporary reviews and theoretical articles are welcomed and the Editors invite such proposals from interested authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信