利用起搏导线优化射频辅助铅入猪室间隔:一项系统的体外评估。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Binbin Luo, Longfu Jiang, Lingping Gao, Wenni Zhu, Lu Zhang, Ding Yuan
{"title":"利用起搏导线优化射频辅助铅入猪室间隔:一项系统的体外评估。","authors":"Binbin Luo, Longfu Jiang, Lingping Gao, Wenni Zhu, Lu Zhang, Ding Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a promising physiological pacing modality, but fibrotic or calcified interventricular septal tissue can prevent lead advancement. Radiofrequency (RF) energy has been applied in transseptal puncture and lead extraction, but its optimal use for pacing lead penetration has not been systematically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of different RF energy settings for facilitating pacing lead penetration through the interventricular septum in an ex vivo swine model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Freshly excised swine hearts (n=6) were immersed in a temperature-controlled (37°C) circulating saline bath. The SelectSecure 3830 lead was positioned manually against the septum under fluoroscopic guidance. RF energy was delivered using an ERBE VIO300S electrosurgical generator in cutting mode across 12 combinations: four energy levels (10, 20, 30, 55 W) and three durations (1, 2, 3 s). Additionally, spark mode(20,30W) was tested with 3 times and 5 times of sparking. Each combination was tested six times. Outcome metrics included penetration success (rupture of the RV septal endocardium), safety markers (significant bubble formation, tissue charring), and histological assessment of myocardial injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 10 W, penetration was not achieved in any trial. At 20 W, application for 1-2 seconds achieved an 88.9% success rate with minimal collateral injury. In contrast, power ≥30 W or durations >2 seconds significantly increased bubble formation (up to 94%) and deep myocardial necrosis. Histology confirmed that 20 W/1-2 seconds produced sharp cleavage of fibrotic tissue with preservation of deeper myocardial architecture. Spark mode was less stable and reproducible compared with optimized continuous settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RF-assisted pacing lead delivery using 20 W for 1∼2s represents an effective and safe strategy for overcoming superficial septal fibrosis in ex vivo settings. This technique may offer a viable rescue option during challenging LBBAP procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Radiofrequency-Assisted Lead Penetration into Swine Interventricular Septum Using Pacing Leads: A Systematic In Vitro Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Binbin Luo, Longfu Jiang, Lingping Gao, Wenni Zhu, Lu Zhang, Ding Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a promising physiological pacing modality, but fibrotic or calcified interventricular septal tissue can prevent lead advancement. Radiofrequency (RF) energy has been applied in transseptal puncture and lead extraction, but its optimal use for pacing lead penetration has not been systematically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of different RF energy settings for facilitating pacing lead penetration through the interventricular septum in an ex vivo swine model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Freshly excised swine hearts (n=6) were immersed in a temperature-controlled (37°C) circulating saline bath. The SelectSecure 3830 lead was positioned manually against the septum under fluoroscopic guidance. RF energy was delivered using an ERBE VIO300S electrosurgical generator in cutting mode across 12 combinations: four energy levels (10, 20, 30, 55 W) and three durations (1, 2, 3 s). Additionally, spark mode(20,30W) was tested with 3 times and 5 times of sparking. Each combination was tested six times. Outcome metrics included penetration success (rupture of the RV septal endocardium), safety markers (significant bubble formation, tissue charring), and histological assessment of myocardial injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 10 W, penetration was not achieved in any trial. At 20 W, application for 1-2 seconds achieved an 88.9% success rate with minimal collateral injury. In contrast, power ≥30 W or durations >2 seconds significantly increased bubble formation (up to 94%) and deep myocardial necrosis. Histology confirmed that 20 W/1-2 seconds produced sharp cleavage of fibrotic tissue with preservation of deeper myocardial architecture. Spark mode was less stable and reproducible compared with optimized continuous settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RF-assisted pacing lead delivery using 20 W for 1∼2s represents an effective and safe strategy for overcoming superficial septal fibrosis in ex vivo settings. This technique may offer a viable rescue option during challenging LBBAP procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.045\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左束支区起搏(LBBAP)是一种很有前途的生理起搏方式,但纤维化或钙化的室间隔组织可阻止导联进展。射频(RF)能量已应用于经隔膜穿刺和铅提取,但其在起搏铅穿透方面的最佳用途尚未得到系统评价。目的:在离体猪模型中评估不同射频能量设置促进起搏导联穿过室间隔的安全性和有效性。方法:将新鲜切除的猪心脏(n=6)浸泡在温度控制(37°C)的循环盐水浴中。在透视引导下,将SelectSecure 3830导联手动定位在隔膜上。使用ERBE VIO300S电刀发生器在切割模式下提供12种组合的射频能量:4个能级(10、20、30、55 W)和3个持续时间(1、2、3 s)。此外,火花模式(20,30w)进行了3次和5次火花测试。每种组合都测试了六次。结果指标包括穿刺成功(右心室间隔心内膜破裂)、安全指标(明显的气泡形成、组织炭化)和心肌损伤的组织学评估。结果:在10 W时,所有试验均未达到穿透。在20w下,应用1-2秒,成功率达到88.9%,附带损伤最小。相比之下,功率≥30 W或持续时间>.2秒显著增加气泡形成(高达94%)和深度心肌坏死。组织学证实,20 W/1-2秒可使纤维化组织发生明显分裂,但保留了更深的心肌结构。与优化的连续设置相比,火花模式的稳定性和可重复性较差。结论:射频辅助起搏导联使用20w持续1 ~ 2s是一种有效且安全的策略,可用于克服离体情况下的浅表性间隔纤维化。该技术可能在具有挑战性的LBBAP手术中提供可行的抢救选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Radiofrequency-Assisted Lead Penetration into Swine Interventricular Septum Using Pacing Leads: A Systematic In Vitro Assessment.

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a promising physiological pacing modality, but fibrotic or calcified interventricular septal tissue can prevent lead advancement. Radiofrequency (RF) energy has been applied in transseptal puncture and lead extraction, but its optimal use for pacing lead penetration has not been systematically evaluated.

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of different RF energy settings for facilitating pacing lead penetration through the interventricular septum in an ex vivo swine model.

Methods: Freshly excised swine hearts (n=6) were immersed in a temperature-controlled (37°C) circulating saline bath. The SelectSecure 3830 lead was positioned manually against the septum under fluoroscopic guidance. RF energy was delivered using an ERBE VIO300S electrosurgical generator in cutting mode across 12 combinations: four energy levels (10, 20, 30, 55 W) and three durations (1, 2, 3 s). Additionally, spark mode(20,30W) was tested with 3 times and 5 times of sparking. Each combination was tested six times. Outcome metrics included penetration success (rupture of the RV septal endocardium), safety markers (significant bubble formation, tissue charring), and histological assessment of myocardial injury.

Results: At 10 W, penetration was not achieved in any trial. At 20 W, application for 1-2 seconds achieved an 88.9% success rate with minimal collateral injury. In contrast, power ≥30 W or durations >2 seconds significantly increased bubble formation (up to 94%) and deep myocardial necrosis. Histology confirmed that 20 W/1-2 seconds produced sharp cleavage of fibrotic tissue with preservation of deeper myocardial architecture. Spark mode was less stable and reproducible compared with optimized continuous settings.

Conclusions: RF-assisted pacing lead delivery using 20 W for 1∼2s represents an effective and safe strategy for overcoming superficial septal fibrosis in ex vivo settings. This technique may offer a viable rescue option during challenging LBBAP procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信