Yang Wu, Yuanting Zhu, Shuaiye Liu, Yanqing Hu, Shan Ma
{"title":"Bendopnea作为住院心力衰竭患者不良事件的独立预后标志物:来自多中心前瞻性队列研究的见解","authors":"Yang Wu, Yuanting Zhu, Shuaiye Liu, Yanqing Hu, Shan Ma","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1659830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart failure (HF) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality globally, affecting over 64 million individuals ( 1). Despite advancements in therapeutic strategies, the heterogeneity of HF symptoms complicates risk stratification and personalized management. Bendopnea, defined as dyspnea occurring within 30 s of forward trunk flexion, has emerged as a potential marker of hemodynamic compromise, yet its clinical significance in large multicenter cohorts remains underexplored. This prospective study enrolled 482 hospitalized HF patients from 2 tertiary care centers, stratifying them into bendopnea (<i>n</i> = 208) and non-bendopnea (<i>n</i> = 274) groups. Our results demonstrated that bendopnea was associated with more severe cardiac dysfunction, including lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF: 38.9% ± 7.6% vs. 42.7% ± 8.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD: 63.8 ± 5.9 mm vs. 59.2 ± 5.6 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and higher NT-proBNP levels (median 1,320.5 ng/L vs. 985.2 ng/L, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Over 1.5 years of follow-up, patients with bendopnea exhibited a significantly higher cumulative incidence of adverse events: HF rehospitalization (35.1% vs. 22.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), all-cause mortality (19.7% vs. 12.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.003), and arrhythmias requiring intervention (20.7% vs. 11.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed bendopnea as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (<i>HR</i> = 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.0, <i>P</i> < 0.001). These findings highlight bendopnea as a clinically actionable marker for risk stratification in HF, supporting its integration into routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1659830"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bendopnea as an independent prognostic marker for adverse events in hospitalized heart failure patients: insights from a multicenter prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Wu, Yuanting Zhu, Shuaiye Liu, Yanqing Hu, Shan Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1659830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Heart failure (HF) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality globally, affecting over 64 million individuals ( 1). Despite advancements in therapeutic strategies, the heterogeneity of HF symptoms complicates risk stratification and personalized management. Bendopnea, defined as dyspnea occurring within 30 s of forward trunk flexion, has emerged as a potential marker of hemodynamic compromise, yet its clinical significance in large multicenter cohorts remains underexplored. This prospective study enrolled 482 hospitalized HF patients from 2 tertiary care centers, stratifying them into bendopnea (<i>n</i> = 208) and non-bendopnea (<i>n</i> = 274) groups. Our results demonstrated that bendopnea was associated with more severe cardiac dysfunction, including lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF: 38.9% ± 7.6% vs. 42.7% ± 8.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD: 63.8 ± 5.9 mm vs. 59.2 ± 5.6 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and higher NT-proBNP levels (median 1,320.5 ng/L vs. 985.2 ng/L, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Over 1.5 years of follow-up, patients with bendopnea exhibited a significantly higher cumulative incidence of adverse events: HF rehospitalization (35.1% vs. 22.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), all-cause mortality (19.7% vs. 12.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.003), and arrhythmias requiring intervention (20.7% vs. 11.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed bendopnea as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (<i>HR</i> = 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.0, <i>P</i> < 0.001). These findings highlight bendopnea as a clinically actionable marker for risk stratification in HF, supporting its integration into routine clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1659830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504264/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1659830\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1659830","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心力衰竭(HF)仍然是全球心血管疾病发病率和死亡率的主要原因,影响超过6400万人(1)。尽管治疗策略取得了进步,但心衰症状的异质性使风险分层和个性化管理复杂化。腰屈通气被定义为在躯干前屈30秒内出现呼吸困难,已成为血流动力学受损的潜在标志,但其在大型多中心队列中的临床意义仍未得到充分探讨。这项前瞻性研究纳入了来自2个三级医疗中心的482名住院HF患者,将他们分为弯曲通气组(n = 208)和非弯曲通气组(n = 274)。我们的研究结果表明,腹侧开放与更严重的心功能障碍相关,包括较低的左室射血分数(LVEF: 38.9%±7.6% vs 42.7%±8.1%,P P P P = 0.003)和需要干预的心律失常(20.7% vs 11.7%, P = 0.001)。多变量Cox回归证实弯曲通气是不良结局的独立预测因子(HR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.0, P
Bendopnea as an independent prognostic marker for adverse events in hospitalized heart failure patients: insights from a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Heart failure (HF) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality globally, affecting over 64 million individuals ( 1). Despite advancements in therapeutic strategies, the heterogeneity of HF symptoms complicates risk stratification and personalized management. Bendopnea, defined as dyspnea occurring within 30 s of forward trunk flexion, has emerged as a potential marker of hemodynamic compromise, yet its clinical significance in large multicenter cohorts remains underexplored. This prospective study enrolled 482 hospitalized HF patients from 2 tertiary care centers, stratifying them into bendopnea (n = 208) and non-bendopnea (n = 274) groups. Our results demonstrated that bendopnea was associated with more severe cardiac dysfunction, including lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF: 38.9% ± 7.6% vs. 42.7% ± 8.1%, P < 0.001), larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD: 63.8 ± 5.9 mm vs. 59.2 ± 5.6 mm, P < 0.001), and higher NT-proBNP levels (median 1,320.5 ng/L vs. 985.2 ng/L, P < 0.001). Over 1.5 years of follow-up, patients with bendopnea exhibited a significantly higher cumulative incidence of adverse events: HF rehospitalization (35.1% vs. 22.3%, P < 0.001), all-cause mortality (19.7% vs. 12.4%, P = 0.003), and arrhythmias requiring intervention (20.7% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed bendopnea as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (HR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.0, P < 0.001). These findings highlight bendopnea as a clinically actionable marker for risk stratification in HF, supporting its integration into routine clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers?
At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.