胆道插管的主要预切技术:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Eugene Annor, Nneoma Ubah, Dhaval Save, Ishaan Vohra, Ritu Raj Singh, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam, Harishankar Gopakumar
{"title":"胆道插管的主要预切技术:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Eugene Annor, Nneoma Ubah, Dhaval Save, Ishaan Vohra, Ritu Raj Singh, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam, Harishankar Gopakumar","doi":"10.5946/ce.2025.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Biliary cannulation is a critical component of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). When standard methods fail, needle-knife precut sphincterotomy (NKPS) is commonly employed. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of using NKPS as a primary technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2024 that assessed outcomes of primary precut techniques. \"Primary precut\" was defined as needle-knife sphincterotomy performed as the initial approach without any prior standard cannulation attempts. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and the I² statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 57.95 years (standard deviation [SD], 7.59), and 53.23% were female. The cannulation success rate was 96.50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.90-97.60) with no heterogeneity (Q, 7.10; df, 8; I²=0%; p=0.935). The rates of adverse events were as follows: post-ERCP pancreatitis, 1.90% (95% CI, 1.20-3.10; I²=0; p =0.942); bleeding, 2.60% (95% CI, 1.70-4.00, I²=0; p=0.725); cholangitis, 1.50% (95% CI, 0.60-3.60; I²=45.27; p=0.067); and perforation, 0.90% (95% CI, 0.40-1.90; I²=0; p=0.948). The overall adverse event rate was 9.70% (95% CI, 5.70-16.10; I²=83.39; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary precut sphincterotomy appears to be an effective and safe technique for biliary cannulation in ERCP. These findings support its consideration as a viable first-line approach in appropriate clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10351,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary precut techniques for biliary cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Eugene Annor, Nneoma Ubah, Dhaval Save, Ishaan Vohra, Ritu Raj Singh, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam, Harishankar Gopakumar\",\"doi\":\"10.5946/ce.2025.110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Biliary cannulation is a critical component of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). When standard methods fail, needle-knife precut sphincterotomy (NKPS) is commonly employed. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of using NKPS as a primary technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2024 that assessed outcomes of primary precut techniques. \\\"Primary precut\\\" was defined as needle-knife sphincterotomy performed as the initial approach without any prior standard cannulation attempts. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and the I² statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 57.95 years (standard deviation [SD], 7.59), and 53.23% were female. The cannulation success rate was 96.50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.90-97.60) with no heterogeneity (Q, 7.10; df, 8; I²=0%; p=0.935). The rates of adverse events were as follows: post-ERCP pancreatitis, 1.90% (95% CI, 1.20-3.10; I²=0; p =0.942); bleeding, 2.60% (95% CI, 1.70-4.00, I²=0; p=0.725); cholangitis, 1.50% (95% CI, 0.60-3.60; I²=45.27; p=0.067); and perforation, 0.90% (95% CI, 0.40-1.90; I²=0; p=0.948). The overall adverse event rate was 9.70% (95% CI, 5.70-16.10; I²=83.39; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary precut sphincterotomy appears to be an effective and safe technique for biliary cannulation in ERCP. These findings support its consideration as a viable first-line approach in appropriate clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:胆道插管是内镜逆行胆管造影术(ERCP)的重要组成部分。当标准方法失败时,通常采用针刀预切括约肌切开术(NKPS)。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了使用NKPS作为主要技术的安全性和有效性。方法:检索2000年1月至2024年11月期间发表的评估初级预切技术结果的研究。“初级预切”定义为在没有任何标准插管尝试的情况下,将针刀括约肌切开术作为初始入路。采用随机效应模型计算合并比例,采用q检验和I²统计量评估异质性。结果:患者平均年龄57.95岁(标准差为7.59),女性占53.23%。插管成功率为96.50%(95%可信区间[CI], 94.90 ~ 97.60),无异质性(Q, 7.10; df, 8; I²=0%;p=0.935)。不良事件发生率如下:ercp后胰腺炎发生率为1.90% (95% CI, 1.20-3.10; I²=0;p =0.942);出血,2.60% (95% CI, 1.70 - -4.00,我²= 0,p = 0.725);胆管炎,1.50% (95% CI, 0.60 - -3.60;我²= 45.27;p = 0.067);穿孔率为0.90% (95% CI, 0.40 ~ 1.90; I²=0;p=0.948)。总不良事件发生率为9.70% (95% CI, 5.70-16.10; I²=83.39)。结论:原发性预切括约肌切开术在ERCP胆道插管中是一种有效且安全的技术。这些发现支持在适当的临床环境中将其作为可行的一线治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary precut techniques for biliary cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background/aims: Biliary cannulation is a critical component of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). When standard methods fail, needle-knife precut sphincterotomy (NKPS) is commonly employed. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of using NKPS as a primary technique.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2024 that assessed outcomes of primary precut techniques. "Primary precut" was defined as needle-knife sphincterotomy performed as the initial approach without any prior standard cannulation attempts. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and the I² statistic.

Results: The mean patient age was 57.95 years (standard deviation [SD], 7.59), and 53.23% were female. The cannulation success rate was 96.50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.90-97.60) with no heterogeneity (Q, 7.10; df, 8; I²=0%; p=0.935). The rates of adverse events were as follows: post-ERCP pancreatitis, 1.90% (95% CI, 1.20-3.10; I²=0; p =0.942); bleeding, 2.60% (95% CI, 1.70-4.00, I²=0; p=0.725); cholangitis, 1.50% (95% CI, 0.60-3.60; I²=45.27; p=0.067); and perforation, 0.90% (95% CI, 0.40-1.90; I²=0; p=0.948). The overall adverse event rate was 9.70% (95% CI, 5.70-16.10; I²=83.39; p<0.001).

Conclusions: Primary precut sphincterotomy appears to be an effective and safe technique for biliary cannulation in ERCP. These findings support its consideration as a viable first-line approach in appropriate clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Endoscopy
Clinical Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信