从像素到蠕动:用人工智能和内窥镜专家比较失弛缓症的诊断。

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Evandros Kaklamanos, Kristjana Kristinsdottir, Matthew Wittbrodt, Meng Li, Panyavee Pitisuttithum, Wenjun Kou, Rajesh N Keswani, Dustin Carlson, Mozziyar Etemadi, John E Pandolfino
{"title":"从像素到蠕动:用人工智能和内窥镜专家比较失弛缓症的诊断。","authors":"Evandros Kaklamanos, Kristjana Kristinsdottir, Matthew Wittbrodt, Meng Li, Panyavee Pitisuttithum, Wenjun Kou, Rajesh N Keswani, Dustin Carlson, Mozziyar Etemadi, John E Pandolfino","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Esophageal motility disorders, such as achalasia, require the use of multiple tests to establish a diagnosis. Patients are first assessed with upper endoscopy, but subtle disease indicators are often overlooked during the procedure leading to delayed diagnosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to prevent these misdiagnoses and serve as an early screening tool to enhance the physician's decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a video-based transformer model capable of detecting achalasia from upper endoscopy videos. Videos were collected from 1,203 patients who presented with dysphagia between August 2018 and January 2024. The model performance was compared to a baseline of two expert physicians independently reviewing each video and consulting one another for a final consensus decision. A test set of 95 patients was used to evaluate the physician consensus and model performance based on ground truth labels obtained via high-resolution manometry (HRM) the Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) scheme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model attained similar performance to the physician consensus on the test set, achieving an accuracy and F1 of 0.926 and 0.821, respectively, compared to the physicians (0.905, 0.710). The model also obtained fewer false negatives, achieving a sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.800 and 0.947 respectively compared to the physicians (0.550, 0.893). Furthermore, the model's attention mechanism emphasized clinically relevant features such as presence of fluid or food in the esophagus, and a tight lower esophageal sphincter (LES).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that AI can leverage upper endoscopy videos to detect achalasia with an accuracy comparable to that of expert endoscopists.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Pixels to Peristalsis: Comparing Achalasia Diagnosis with Artificial Intelligence to Expert Endoscopists.\",\"authors\":\"Evandros Kaklamanos, Kristjana Kristinsdottir, Matthew Wittbrodt, Meng Li, Panyavee Pitisuttithum, Wenjun Kou, Rajesh N Keswani, Dustin Carlson, Mozziyar Etemadi, John E Pandolfino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Esophageal motility disorders, such as achalasia, require the use of multiple tests to establish a diagnosis. Patients are first assessed with upper endoscopy, but subtle disease indicators are often overlooked during the procedure leading to delayed diagnosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to prevent these misdiagnoses and serve as an early screening tool to enhance the physician's decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a video-based transformer model capable of detecting achalasia from upper endoscopy videos. Videos were collected from 1,203 patients who presented with dysphagia between August 2018 and January 2024. The model performance was compared to a baseline of two expert physicians independently reviewing each video and consulting one another for a final consensus decision. A test set of 95 patients was used to evaluate the physician consensus and model performance based on ground truth labels obtained via high-resolution manometry (HRM) the Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) scheme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model attained similar performance to the physician consensus on the test set, achieving an accuracy and F1 of 0.926 and 0.821, respectively, compared to the physicians (0.905, 0.710). The model also obtained fewer false negatives, achieving a sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.800 and 0.947 respectively compared to the physicians (0.550, 0.893). Furthermore, the model's attention mechanism emphasized clinically relevant features such as presence of fluid or food in the esophagus, and a tight lower esophageal sphincter (LES).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that AI can leverage upper endoscopy videos to detect achalasia with an accuracy comparable to that of expert endoscopists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.034\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.09.034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:食道运动障碍,如贲门失弛缓症,需要使用多种检查来建立诊断。患者首先通过上内窥镜进行评估,但在手术过程中经常忽略细微的疾病指标,导致诊断延迟。人工智能(AI)有可能预防这些误诊,并作为早期筛查工具,提高医生的决策能力。方法:我们开发了一个基于视频的变压器模型,能够从上腔镜视频中检测贲门失弛缓症。从2018年8月至2024年1月期间出现吞咽困难的1203名患者中收集了视频。模型的表现与两位专家医生独立审查每个视频并相互咨询以达成最终共识的基线进行比较。使用一组95例患者的测试来评估医生共识和模型性能,该测试基于通过芝加哥分类v4.0 (CCv4.0)方案的高分辨率测压法(HRM)获得的地面真值标签。结果:该模型在测试集上获得了与医生共识相似的性能,与医生(0.905,0.710)相比,准确率和F1分别为0.926和0.821。该模型的假阴性也较少,其敏感性和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为0.800和0.947,而医生的NPV分别为0.550和0.893。此外,该模型的注意机制强调了临床上相关的特征,如食道中存在液体或食物,以及食管下括约肌(LES)紧绷。结论:这些结果表明,人工智能可以利用上消化道内窥镜视频来检测贲门失弛缓症,其准确性与内窥镜专家相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Pixels to Peristalsis: Comparing Achalasia Diagnosis with Artificial Intelligence to Expert Endoscopists.

Background & aims: Esophageal motility disorders, such as achalasia, require the use of multiple tests to establish a diagnosis. Patients are first assessed with upper endoscopy, but subtle disease indicators are often overlooked during the procedure leading to delayed diagnosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to prevent these misdiagnoses and serve as an early screening tool to enhance the physician's decision-making.

Methods: We developed a video-based transformer model capable of detecting achalasia from upper endoscopy videos. Videos were collected from 1,203 patients who presented with dysphagia between August 2018 and January 2024. The model performance was compared to a baseline of two expert physicians independently reviewing each video and consulting one another for a final consensus decision. A test set of 95 patients was used to evaluate the physician consensus and model performance based on ground truth labels obtained via high-resolution manometry (HRM) the Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) scheme.

Results: The model attained similar performance to the physician consensus on the test set, achieving an accuracy and F1 of 0.926 and 0.821, respectively, compared to the physicians (0.905, 0.710). The model also obtained fewer false negatives, achieving a sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.800 and 0.947 respectively compared to the physicians (0.550, 0.893). Furthermore, the model's attention mechanism emphasized clinically relevant features such as presence of fluid or food in the esophagus, and a tight lower esophageal sphincter (LES).

Conclusion: These results indicate that AI can leverage upper endoscopy videos to detect achalasia with an accuracy comparable to that of expert endoscopists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信