Khalid Orayj , Vijaya Paul Samuel , Shakir Saleem , Sahithya Ravali Ravula , Haider Ali , Gaurav Gupta , K. Benod Kumar , Pran Kishore Deb , Kumarappan Chidambaram
{"title":"特应性皮炎中基于免疫测定的生物标志物。","authors":"Khalid Orayj , Vijaya Paul Samuel , Shakir Saleem , Sahithya Ravali Ravula , Haider Ali , Gaurav Gupta , K. Benod Kumar , Pran Kishore Deb , Kumarappan Chidambaram","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2025.120634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a persistent and recurring inflammatory skin condition that affects 204 million people worldwide, with prevalence rates of 11.1 % among children and 6.3 % among adults. This condition affects multiple systems, resulting in pruritus, skin barrier defects, and a Th2-driven immune imbalance, which consequently leads to significant costs and a diminished quality of life. To enhance precision medicine in laboratory diagnostics, it is essential to identify a neutral biomarker that can complement traditional severity assessments, such as SCORAD and EASI, for the diverse phenotypes and endotypes of AD. This narrative review examines immunoassay-based biomarkers with proven clinical validity in diagnostic laboratory medicine. Biomarkers such as TARC/CCL17, IL-13, IL-22, IL-31, SCCA1/SCCA2, and periostin are assessed using various tests, including ELISA, bead-based multiplexing, proximity extension, and highly sensitive digital methods. The samples included serum, plasma, and skin samples obtained through tape-stripping and microneedle collection. The parameters for analytical validation included detection and quantification limits, reportable range, precision, linearity, carryover effects, method comparison, interference assessment, heterophile antibody effects, calibration, and external quality standards. Clinical performance assessment uses measures such as the area under the curve (AUC), likelihood ratios, and decision limitations. Conventional biomarkers, including total IgE, peripheral eosinophil count, and tryptase, show less clinical utility than new biomarkers. Critical implementation requirements include standardized skin sample collection methods, population-specific reference intervals, inter-platform harmonization, and consensus-based cut-off values with clinical significance. This review outlines an evidence-based plan for incorporating reliable AD biomarker tests into current diagnostic methods to facilitate precise skin treatment and personalized care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":"579 ","pages":"Article 120634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunoassay-based biomarkers in atopic dermatitis\",\"authors\":\"Khalid Orayj , Vijaya Paul Samuel , Shakir Saleem , Sahithya Ravali Ravula , Haider Ali , Gaurav Gupta , K. Benod Kumar , Pran Kishore Deb , Kumarappan Chidambaram\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cca.2025.120634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a persistent and recurring inflammatory skin condition that affects 204 million people worldwide, with prevalence rates of 11.1 % among children and 6.3 % among adults. This condition affects multiple systems, resulting in pruritus, skin barrier defects, and a Th2-driven immune imbalance, which consequently leads to significant costs and a diminished quality of life. To enhance precision medicine in laboratory diagnostics, it is essential to identify a neutral biomarker that can complement traditional severity assessments, such as SCORAD and EASI, for the diverse phenotypes and endotypes of AD. This narrative review examines immunoassay-based biomarkers with proven clinical validity in diagnostic laboratory medicine. Biomarkers such as TARC/CCL17, IL-13, IL-22, IL-31, SCCA1/SCCA2, and periostin are assessed using various tests, including ELISA, bead-based multiplexing, proximity extension, and highly sensitive digital methods. The samples included serum, plasma, and skin samples obtained through tape-stripping and microneedle collection. The parameters for analytical validation included detection and quantification limits, reportable range, precision, linearity, carryover effects, method comparison, interference assessment, heterophile antibody effects, calibration, and external quality standards. Clinical performance assessment uses measures such as the area under the curve (AUC), likelihood ratios, and decision limitations. Conventional biomarkers, including total IgE, peripheral eosinophil count, and tryptase, show less clinical utility than new biomarkers. Critical implementation requirements include standardized skin sample collection methods, population-specific reference intervals, inter-platform harmonization, and consensus-based cut-off values with clinical significance. This review outlines an evidence-based plan for incorporating reliable AD biomarker tests into current diagnostic methods to facilitate precise skin treatment and personalized care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica Chimica Acta\",\"volume\":\"579 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica Chimica Acta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898125005133\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898125005133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a persistent and recurring inflammatory skin condition that affects 204 million people worldwide, with prevalence rates of 11.1 % among children and 6.3 % among adults. This condition affects multiple systems, resulting in pruritus, skin barrier defects, and a Th2-driven immune imbalance, which consequently leads to significant costs and a diminished quality of life. To enhance precision medicine in laboratory diagnostics, it is essential to identify a neutral biomarker that can complement traditional severity assessments, such as SCORAD and EASI, for the diverse phenotypes and endotypes of AD. This narrative review examines immunoassay-based biomarkers with proven clinical validity in diagnostic laboratory medicine. Biomarkers such as TARC/CCL17, IL-13, IL-22, IL-31, SCCA1/SCCA2, and periostin are assessed using various tests, including ELISA, bead-based multiplexing, proximity extension, and highly sensitive digital methods. The samples included serum, plasma, and skin samples obtained through tape-stripping and microneedle collection. The parameters for analytical validation included detection and quantification limits, reportable range, precision, linearity, carryover effects, method comparison, interference assessment, heterophile antibody effects, calibration, and external quality standards. Clinical performance assessment uses measures such as the area under the curve (AUC), likelihood ratios, and decision limitations. Conventional biomarkers, including total IgE, peripheral eosinophil count, and tryptase, show less clinical utility than new biomarkers. Critical implementation requirements include standardized skin sample collection methods, population-specific reference intervals, inter-platform harmonization, and consensus-based cut-off values with clinical significance. This review outlines an evidence-based plan for incorporating reliable AD biomarker tests into current diagnostic methods to facilitate precise skin treatment and personalized care.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC)
Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells.
The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.