为什么Z世代选择与工程相关的课程?联合分析方法。

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Zachariah John A Belmonte, Yogi Tri Prasetyo, Edison Martinez Esberto, Maela Madel L Cahigas, Reny Nadlifatin
{"title":"为什么Z世代选择与工程相关的课程?联合分析方法。","authors":"Zachariah John A Belmonte, Yogi Tri Prasetyo, Edison Martinez Esberto, Maela Madel L Cahigas, Reny Nadlifatin","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Engineering plays a critical role in driving industrialization, advancing technology, and sustaining national development, yet interest in engineering careers among Generation Z has shown a troubling decline worldwide. Understanding how this cohort makes educational and career choices is essential for strengthening the future engineering workforce. The purpose of this study was to quantify how Generation Z students evaluate competing attributes when selecting engineering-related courses. Using a fractional-factorial conjoint design (16 profiles; 7-point ratings), a survey of 500 first-year engineering students in the Philippines estimated part-worth utilities and attribute importance for six factors: tuition fees, expected salary, employability, and recommendations from teachers, peers, and relatives. Conjoint estimates revealed a clear hierarchy of preferences: expected salary was the most influential attribute, followed by tuition fees and teacher recommendations; employability exerted a moderate effect, while endorsements from peers and relatives were weakest. Framed by Expectancy-Value, Social Influence, and Self-Efficacy theories, the results indicate that Gen Z enrollment decisions are primarily value-driven (costs vs. returns) and reinforced by credible authority signals from teachers rather than normative pressures from family or friends. Methodologically, the study demonstrates the utility of conjoint analysis for uncovering implicit trade-offs in high-stakes educational choices, translating psychological constructs into measurable preference structures. Practically, the findings highlight strategic levers for policymakers and institutions: aligning tuition policies with affordability concerns, providing transparent information on career outcomes, strengthening teacher mentorship, and enhancing employability pathways. These insights contribute to both educational policy and psychological research on decision-making among Generation Z.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"260 ","pages":"105691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why did Generation Z choose engineering-related courses? A conjoint analysis approach.\",\"authors\":\"Zachariah John A Belmonte, Yogi Tri Prasetyo, Edison Martinez Esberto, Maela Madel L Cahigas, Reny Nadlifatin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Engineering plays a critical role in driving industrialization, advancing technology, and sustaining national development, yet interest in engineering careers among Generation Z has shown a troubling decline worldwide. Understanding how this cohort makes educational and career choices is essential for strengthening the future engineering workforce. The purpose of this study was to quantify how Generation Z students evaluate competing attributes when selecting engineering-related courses. Using a fractional-factorial conjoint design (16 profiles; 7-point ratings), a survey of 500 first-year engineering students in the Philippines estimated part-worth utilities and attribute importance for six factors: tuition fees, expected salary, employability, and recommendations from teachers, peers, and relatives. Conjoint estimates revealed a clear hierarchy of preferences: expected salary was the most influential attribute, followed by tuition fees and teacher recommendations; employability exerted a moderate effect, while endorsements from peers and relatives were weakest. Framed by Expectancy-Value, Social Influence, and Self-Efficacy theories, the results indicate that Gen Z enrollment decisions are primarily value-driven (costs vs. returns) and reinforced by credible authority signals from teachers rather than normative pressures from family or friends. Methodologically, the study demonstrates the utility of conjoint analysis for uncovering implicit trade-offs in high-stakes educational choices, translating psychological constructs into measurable preference structures. Practically, the findings highlight strategic levers for policymakers and institutions: aligning tuition policies with affordability concerns, providing transparent information on career outcomes, strengthening teacher mentorship, and enhancing employability pathways. These insights contribute to both educational policy and psychological research on decision-making among Generation Z.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"260 \",\"pages\":\"105691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105691\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105691","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工程在推动工业化、推进技术进步和维持国家发展方面发挥着关键作用,但在全球范围内,Z世代对工程职业的兴趣却出现了令人不安的下降。了解这一群体如何做出教育和职业选择,对于加强未来的工程劳动力至关重要。本研究的目的是量化Z世代学生在选择工程相关课程时如何评估竞争属性。采用分数析因联合设计(16份档案;7分评分),对500名菲律宾一年级工程专业学生进行了调查,估计了六个因素的部分价值公用事业和属性重要性:学费、预期工资、就业能力和老师、同龄人和亲戚的推荐。联合估计显示了明显的偏好等级:预期工资是最具影响力的因素,其次是学费和老师推荐;就业能力发挥了中等作用,而来自同伴和亲戚的支持是最弱的。在期望值、社会影响和自我效能理论的框架下,研究结果表明,Z世代的入学决策主要是价值驱动的(成本与回报),并受到来自老师的可信权威信号的强化,而不是来自家人或朋友的规范压力。在方法上,该研究证明了联合分析在揭示高风险教育选择中的隐含权衡方面的效用,将心理结构转化为可测量的偏好结构。实际上,研究结果强调了政策制定者和机构的战略杠杆:使学费政策与可负担性问题保持一致,提供关于职业成果的透明信息,加强教师指导,并改善就业途径。这些见解有助于对Z世代决策的教育政策和心理学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why did Generation Z choose engineering-related courses? A conjoint analysis approach.

Engineering plays a critical role in driving industrialization, advancing technology, and sustaining national development, yet interest in engineering careers among Generation Z has shown a troubling decline worldwide. Understanding how this cohort makes educational and career choices is essential for strengthening the future engineering workforce. The purpose of this study was to quantify how Generation Z students evaluate competing attributes when selecting engineering-related courses. Using a fractional-factorial conjoint design (16 profiles; 7-point ratings), a survey of 500 first-year engineering students in the Philippines estimated part-worth utilities and attribute importance for six factors: tuition fees, expected salary, employability, and recommendations from teachers, peers, and relatives. Conjoint estimates revealed a clear hierarchy of preferences: expected salary was the most influential attribute, followed by tuition fees and teacher recommendations; employability exerted a moderate effect, while endorsements from peers and relatives were weakest. Framed by Expectancy-Value, Social Influence, and Self-Efficacy theories, the results indicate that Gen Z enrollment decisions are primarily value-driven (costs vs. returns) and reinforced by credible authority signals from teachers rather than normative pressures from family or friends. Methodologically, the study demonstrates the utility of conjoint analysis for uncovering implicit trade-offs in high-stakes educational choices, translating psychological constructs into measurable preference structures. Practically, the findings highlight strategic levers for policymakers and institutions: aligning tuition policies with affordability concerns, providing transparent information on career outcomes, strengthening teacher mentorship, and enhancing employability pathways. These insights contribute to both educational policy and psychological research on decision-making among Generation Z.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信