地球物理数据集几何反演研究进展综述

IF 7.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Saeed Vatankhah, Peter G. Lelièvre, Jérémie Giraud
{"title":"地球物理数据集几何反演研究进展综述","authors":"Saeed Vatankhah,&nbsp;Peter G. Lelièvre,&nbsp;Jérémie Giraud","doi":"10.1007/s10712-025-09902-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using geophysical inversion to determine the geometry of subsurface targets has a long-established history, tracing back to the early days of geophysical interpretation. These methods continue to gain considerable attention because of the growing demand for more precise and interpretable visual representations of subsurface bodies. A recent surge in interest has led to the development of numerous new strategies and algorithms that share the common primary goal of defining target geometries. A comprehensive review of these approaches is currently lacking, which has led to some overlap in research, where studies fail to acknowledge prior work or clarify how their methods compare with, or differ from, work by other researchers. In this paper, we present a thorough review of recent developments in the field, aiming: (1) to provide readers with a broader understanding of the various geometry-based inversion techniques currently being researched, (2) to help practitioners assess the practical applications of these inversion methods, and (3) to provide insight into promising directions for future research. We propose a standardized classification system and terminology to support the research community in formulating, discussing, and disseminating their findings within this rapidly expanding domain. We classify the approaches into five distinct categories. For each, we provide a broad literature search to discuss: the applications and types of geophysical data used, the parameters estimated by the inversion algorithms, the prior information and constraints applied, computational and numerical details, visualization and model evaluation approaches, and interpretation strategies. We finish with a forward looking discussion to summarize.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49458,"journal":{"name":"Surveys in Geophysics","volume":"46 5","pages":"973 - 1018"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Advancements in Geometry-Based Inversion of Geophysical Data Sets\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Vatankhah,&nbsp;Peter G. Lelièvre,&nbsp;Jérémie Giraud\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10712-025-09902-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using geophysical inversion to determine the geometry of subsurface targets has a long-established history, tracing back to the early days of geophysical interpretation. These methods continue to gain considerable attention because of the growing demand for more precise and interpretable visual representations of subsurface bodies. A recent surge in interest has led to the development of numerous new strategies and algorithms that share the common primary goal of defining target geometries. A comprehensive review of these approaches is currently lacking, which has led to some overlap in research, where studies fail to acknowledge prior work or clarify how their methods compare with, or differ from, work by other researchers. In this paper, we present a thorough review of recent developments in the field, aiming: (1) to provide readers with a broader understanding of the various geometry-based inversion techniques currently being researched, (2) to help practitioners assess the practical applications of these inversion methods, and (3) to provide insight into promising directions for future research. We propose a standardized classification system and terminology to support the research community in formulating, discussing, and disseminating their findings within this rapidly expanding domain. We classify the approaches into five distinct categories. For each, we provide a broad literature search to discuss: the applications and types of geophysical data used, the parameters estimated by the inversion algorithms, the prior information and constraints applied, computational and numerical details, visualization and model evaluation approaches, and interpretation strategies. We finish with a forward looking discussion to summarize.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surveys in Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"973 - 1018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surveys in Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10712-025-09902-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surveys in Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10712-025-09902-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用地球物理反演来确定地下目标的几何形状有着悠久的历史,可以追溯到地球物理解释的早期。这些方法继续获得相当多的关注,因为越来越多的需求更精确和可解释的地下体的视觉表示。最近的兴趣激增导致了许多新的策略和算法的发展,这些策略和算法的共同主要目标是定义目标几何形状。目前缺乏对这些方法的全面审查,这导致了研究中的一些重叠,这些研究未能承认先前的工作或澄清他们的方法与其他研究人员的工作相比或不同。在本文中,我们对该领域的最新发展进行了全面的回顾,旨在:(1)为读者提供对目前正在研究的各种基于几何的反演技术的更广泛的理解,(2)帮助从业者评估这些反演方法的实际应用,(3)为未来的研究提供有前途的方向。我们提出了一个标准化的分类系统和术语,以支持研究界在这个快速发展的领域中制定、讨论和传播他们的发现。我们将这些方法分为五个不同的类别。对于每一个,我们提供了广泛的文献检索,以讨论:应用的地球物理数据的应用和类型,反演算法估计的参数,应用的先验信息和约束,计算和数值细节,可视化和模型评估方法,以及解释策略。最后我们以前瞻性的讨论来总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Advancements in Geometry-Based Inversion of Geophysical Data Sets

Using geophysical inversion to determine the geometry of subsurface targets has a long-established history, tracing back to the early days of geophysical interpretation. These methods continue to gain considerable attention because of the growing demand for more precise and interpretable visual representations of subsurface bodies. A recent surge in interest has led to the development of numerous new strategies and algorithms that share the common primary goal of defining target geometries. A comprehensive review of these approaches is currently lacking, which has led to some overlap in research, where studies fail to acknowledge prior work or clarify how their methods compare with, or differ from, work by other researchers. In this paper, we present a thorough review of recent developments in the field, aiming: (1) to provide readers with a broader understanding of the various geometry-based inversion techniques currently being researched, (2) to help practitioners assess the practical applications of these inversion methods, and (3) to provide insight into promising directions for future research. We propose a standardized classification system and terminology to support the research community in formulating, discussing, and disseminating their findings within this rapidly expanding domain. We classify the approaches into five distinct categories. For each, we provide a broad literature search to discuss: the applications and types of geophysical data used, the parameters estimated by the inversion algorithms, the prior information and constraints applied, computational and numerical details, visualization and model evaluation approaches, and interpretation strategies. We finish with a forward looking discussion to summarize.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surveys in Geophysics
Surveys in Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
10.90%
发文量
64
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Surveys in Geophysics publishes refereed review articles on the physical, chemical and biological processes occurring within the Earth, on its surface, in its atmosphere and in the near-Earth space environment, including relations with other bodies in the solar system. Observations, their interpretation, theory and modelling are covered in papers dealing with any of the Earth and space sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信