基于误差估计的卷积神经网络预测多孔结构渗透率的一般框架

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Andre Adam, Silven L. Stallard, Huazhen Fang, Xianglin Li
{"title":"基于误差估计的卷积神经网络预测多孔结构渗透率的一般框架","authors":"Andre Adam,&nbsp;Silven L. Stallard,&nbsp;Huazhen Fang,&nbsp;Xianglin Li","doi":"10.1007/s11242-025-02239-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two major challenges plague permeability prediction with a convolutional neural network (CNN): failure to generalize to external data and the sources of error are not well defined. This study compares five optimized CNN architectures on a training dataset with 4500 images of porous media generated via random sphere-packing, quartet structure generation set, and Voronoi diagrams. An external set of 400 slices of an X-ray tomography from an aluminum foam sample and 300 slices of a 3D reconstruction of a carbon electrode are used for external validation. The permeabilities for all data were calculated using an in-house computational fluid dynamics algorithm. The CNN models were derived from AlexNet, VGG19, DenseNet, ResNet34, and ResNet50 architectures. This work shows that transforming the training data by taking the log of permeability significantly increases the prediction accuracy for all ranges of permeability. The VGG19, ResNet34, and ResNet50 architectures have the highest prediction accuracy, with a mean absolute percent error (MAPE) of 2.64%, 2.61%, and 2.65%, respectively. In the external dataset, the CNNs retained remarkable accuracy, with MAPEs of 1.33%, 1.36%, and 1.44%, respectively. AlexNet and DenseNet performed significantly worse on both datasets. A direct link is found between training dataset diversity and generalization, and the study shows that one type of training data is not enough to extrapolate to other types of microstructures. Permeability prediction with an ensemble of the 10 most accurate VGG19 models from the hyperparameter optimization shows significant accuracy increase, with a MAPE of 1.99% in the test set and 1.22% in the external dataset, while also providing a measure of confidence. Performing Monte Carlo dropout on the VGG19 network indicates that the majority of the error from the CNN prediction comes from noise in the training data. These insights pave the way for more general CNN models, which could come to replace empirical relations as an on-demand alternative to permeability estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":804,"journal":{"name":"Transport in Porous Media","volume":"152 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A General Framework for Predicting Permeability in Porous Structures Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Error Estimation\",\"authors\":\"Andre Adam,&nbsp;Silven L. Stallard,&nbsp;Huazhen Fang,&nbsp;Xianglin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11242-025-02239-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Two major challenges plague permeability prediction with a convolutional neural network (CNN): failure to generalize to external data and the sources of error are not well defined. This study compares five optimized CNN architectures on a training dataset with 4500 images of porous media generated via random sphere-packing, quartet structure generation set, and Voronoi diagrams. An external set of 400 slices of an X-ray tomography from an aluminum foam sample and 300 slices of a 3D reconstruction of a carbon electrode are used for external validation. The permeabilities for all data were calculated using an in-house computational fluid dynamics algorithm. The CNN models were derived from AlexNet, VGG19, DenseNet, ResNet34, and ResNet50 architectures. This work shows that transforming the training data by taking the log of permeability significantly increases the prediction accuracy for all ranges of permeability. The VGG19, ResNet34, and ResNet50 architectures have the highest prediction accuracy, with a mean absolute percent error (MAPE) of 2.64%, 2.61%, and 2.65%, respectively. In the external dataset, the CNNs retained remarkable accuracy, with MAPEs of 1.33%, 1.36%, and 1.44%, respectively. AlexNet and DenseNet performed significantly worse on both datasets. A direct link is found between training dataset diversity and generalization, and the study shows that one type of training data is not enough to extrapolate to other types of microstructures. Permeability prediction with an ensemble of the 10 most accurate VGG19 models from the hyperparameter optimization shows significant accuracy increase, with a MAPE of 1.99% in the test set and 1.22% in the external dataset, while also providing a measure of confidence. Performing Monte Carlo dropout on the VGG19 network indicates that the majority of the error from the CNN prediction comes from noise in the training data. These insights pave the way for more general CNN models, which could come to replace empirical relations as an on-demand alternative to permeability estimation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport in Porous Media\",\"volume\":\"152 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport in Porous Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11242-025-02239-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport in Porous Media","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11242-025-02239-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卷积神经网络(CNN)渗透率预测面临两大挑战:不能泛化到外部数据和误差来源不明确。本研究在一个训练数据集上比较了五种优化的CNN架构,该数据集使用随机球体填充、四重奏结构生成集和Voronoi图生成的4500张多孔介质图像。外部验证使用了泡沫铝样品的400片x射线断层扫描片和碳电极的300片3D重建片。所有数据的渗透率都是使用内部计算流体动力学算法计算的。CNN模型来源于AlexNet、VGG19、DenseNet、ResNet34和ResNet50架构。研究表明,对训练数据进行渗透率对数变换,可以显著提高所有渗透率范围的预测精度。VGG19、ResNet34和ResNet50的预测精度最高,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)分别为2.64%、2.61%和2.65%。在外部数据集中,cnn保持了显著的准确率,mape分别为1.33%、1.36%和1.44%。AlexNet和DenseNet在两个数据集上的表现都明显更差。研究发现,训练数据集的多样性与泛化之间存在直接联系,并且研究表明,一种类型的训练数据不足以外推到其他类型的微观结构。利用超参数优化得到的10个最精确的VGG19模型集合进行渗透率预测,其准确性显著提高,测试集的MAPE为1.99%,外部数据集的MAPE为1.22%,同时也提供了一定的置信度。在VGG19网络上执行蒙特卡罗dropout表明,CNN预测的大部分误差来自训练数据中的噪声。这些见解为更一般的CNN模型铺平了道路,这些模型可以取代经验关系,作为渗透率估计的按需替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A General Framework for Predicting Permeability in Porous Structures Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Error Estimation

Two major challenges plague permeability prediction with a convolutional neural network (CNN): failure to generalize to external data and the sources of error are not well defined. This study compares five optimized CNN architectures on a training dataset with 4500 images of porous media generated via random sphere-packing, quartet structure generation set, and Voronoi diagrams. An external set of 400 slices of an X-ray tomography from an aluminum foam sample and 300 slices of a 3D reconstruction of a carbon electrode are used for external validation. The permeabilities for all data were calculated using an in-house computational fluid dynamics algorithm. The CNN models were derived from AlexNet, VGG19, DenseNet, ResNet34, and ResNet50 architectures. This work shows that transforming the training data by taking the log of permeability significantly increases the prediction accuracy for all ranges of permeability. The VGG19, ResNet34, and ResNet50 architectures have the highest prediction accuracy, with a mean absolute percent error (MAPE) of 2.64%, 2.61%, and 2.65%, respectively. In the external dataset, the CNNs retained remarkable accuracy, with MAPEs of 1.33%, 1.36%, and 1.44%, respectively. AlexNet and DenseNet performed significantly worse on both datasets. A direct link is found between training dataset diversity and generalization, and the study shows that one type of training data is not enough to extrapolate to other types of microstructures. Permeability prediction with an ensemble of the 10 most accurate VGG19 models from the hyperparameter optimization shows significant accuracy increase, with a MAPE of 1.99% in the test set and 1.22% in the external dataset, while also providing a measure of confidence. Performing Monte Carlo dropout on the VGG19 network indicates that the majority of the error from the CNN prediction comes from noise in the training data. These insights pave the way for more general CNN models, which could come to replace empirical relations as an on-demand alternative to permeability estimation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport in Porous Media
Transport in Porous Media 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: -Publishes original research on physical, chemical, and biological aspects of transport in porous media- Papers on porous media research may originate in various areas of physics, chemistry, biology, natural or materials science, and engineering (chemical, civil, agricultural, petroleum, environmental, electrical, and mechanical engineering)- Emphasizes theory, (numerical) modelling, laboratory work, and non-routine applications- Publishes work of a fundamental nature, of interest to a wide readership, that provides novel insight into porous media processes- Expanded in 2007 from 12 to 15 issues per year. Transport in Porous Media publishes original research on physical and chemical aspects of transport phenomena in rigid and deformable porous media. These phenomena, occurring in single and multiphase flow in porous domains, can be governed by extensive quantities such as mass of a fluid phase, mass of component of a phase, momentum, or energy. Moreover, porous medium deformations can be induced by the transport phenomena, by chemical and electro-chemical activities such as swelling, or by external loading through forces and displacements. These porous media phenomena may be studied by researchers from various areas of physics, chemistry, biology, natural or materials science, and engineering (chemical, civil, agricultural, petroleum, environmental, electrical, and mechanical engineering).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信