钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震回弹性评价方法研究

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Yong-Ming Li, Shan-Suo Zheng, Li-Guo Dong, Song Yang
{"title":"钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震回弹性评价方法研究","authors":"Yong-Ming Li,&nbsp;Shan-Suo Zheng,&nbsp;Li-Guo Dong,&nbsp;Song Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02246-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The quantitative characterization of post-earthquake functional loss and dynamic recovery processes in RC frame structures is the cornerstone for evaluating their seismic resilience. In this paper, a quantitative model for assessing functional loss in RC frame structures is established, spanning from the component to the floor and the structural scale, by analyzing the hierarchical transmission mechanism of functional loss. Additionally, a simulation of the recovery process is conducted using time progression and benchmark algorithms to obtain a complete functional recovery curve. Based on this, an assessment method for the seismic resilience of RC frame structures is established, using functional loss, repair time, and repair rate as metrics. Subsequently, the RC frame structures with different numbers of floors and fortification intensities are built using OpenSees software. The influences of various parameters on the seismic resilience of RC frame structures are analyzed. The results show that as the seismic design intensity increases, both the functional loss and repair time of the structure continue to grow, while the repair rate remains approximately equal under large earthquakes and super earthquakes but relatively slow under moderate earthquakes. Under the same seismic design intensity, the functional loss and repair time of the 6-degree (0.05 g) and 7-degree (0.10 g) fortification structures are significantly lower than those of other fortification structures, while the functional loss and repair time of the 7-degree (0.15 g) fortification structure are the largest. The repair rates of structures across different fortification intensities remain approximately equal. As the number of floors increases, the repair time of the structure tends to rise, while the functional loss and repair rate tend to decrease. The research results can provide a reference for the seismic resilience evaluation of offshore urban systems and the realization of the national resilience urban-rural development goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 13","pages":"5559 - 5586"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on seismic resilience evaluation method of RC frame structures\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Ming Li,&nbsp;Shan-Suo Zheng,&nbsp;Li-Guo Dong,&nbsp;Song Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02246-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The quantitative characterization of post-earthquake functional loss and dynamic recovery processes in RC frame structures is the cornerstone for evaluating their seismic resilience. In this paper, a quantitative model for assessing functional loss in RC frame structures is established, spanning from the component to the floor and the structural scale, by analyzing the hierarchical transmission mechanism of functional loss. Additionally, a simulation of the recovery process is conducted using time progression and benchmark algorithms to obtain a complete functional recovery curve. Based on this, an assessment method for the seismic resilience of RC frame structures is established, using functional loss, repair time, and repair rate as metrics. Subsequently, the RC frame structures with different numbers of floors and fortification intensities are built using OpenSees software. The influences of various parameters on the seismic resilience of RC frame structures are analyzed. The results show that as the seismic design intensity increases, both the functional loss and repair time of the structure continue to grow, while the repair rate remains approximately equal under large earthquakes and super earthquakes but relatively slow under moderate earthquakes. Under the same seismic design intensity, the functional loss and repair time of the 6-degree (0.05 g) and 7-degree (0.10 g) fortification structures are significantly lower than those of other fortification structures, while the functional loss and repair time of the 7-degree (0.15 g) fortification structure are the largest. The repair rates of structures across different fortification intensities remain approximately equal. As the number of floors increases, the repair time of the structure tends to rise, while the functional loss and repair rate tend to decrease. The research results can provide a reference for the seismic resilience evaluation of offshore urban systems and the realization of the national resilience urban-rural development goals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 13\",\"pages\":\"5559 - 5586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02246-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02246-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钢筋混凝土框架结构震后功能损失和动力恢复过程的定量表征是评价其抗震恢复能力的基础。本文通过分析功能损失的分级传递机制,建立了从构件到楼板再到结构尺度的钢筋混凝土框架结构功能损失定量评估模型。此外,利用时间级数和基准算法对恢复过程进行了模拟,获得了完整的功能恢复曲线。在此基础上,建立了以功能损失、修复时间和修复率为指标的钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震回弹性评估方法。随后,使用OpenSees软件构建不同层数和设防烈度的RC框架结构。分析了各参数对钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震性能的影响。结果表明:随着抗震设计烈度的增加,结构的功能损失和修复时间都在持续增长,在大地震和超地震下,修复速度基本保持不变,而在中地震下,修复速度相对较慢;相同抗震设计烈度下,6度(0.05 g)和7度(0.10 g)设防结构的功能损失和修复时间明显低于其他设防结构,而7度(0.15 g)设防结构的功能损失和修复时间最大。不同设防强度下建筑物的修复率大致相等。随着层数的增加,结构的修复时间呈上升趋势,而功能损失和修复率呈下降趋势。研究成果可为近海城市体系抗震弹性评价和实现国家弹性城乡发展目标提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on seismic resilience evaluation method of RC frame structures

The quantitative characterization of post-earthquake functional loss and dynamic recovery processes in RC frame structures is the cornerstone for evaluating their seismic resilience. In this paper, a quantitative model for assessing functional loss in RC frame structures is established, spanning from the component to the floor and the structural scale, by analyzing the hierarchical transmission mechanism of functional loss. Additionally, a simulation of the recovery process is conducted using time progression and benchmark algorithms to obtain a complete functional recovery curve. Based on this, an assessment method for the seismic resilience of RC frame structures is established, using functional loss, repair time, and repair rate as metrics. Subsequently, the RC frame structures with different numbers of floors and fortification intensities are built using OpenSees software. The influences of various parameters on the seismic resilience of RC frame structures are analyzed. The results show that as the seismic design intensity increases, both the functional loss and repair time of the structure continue to grow, while the repair rate remains approximately equal under large earthquakes and super earthquakes but relatively slow under moderate earthquakes. Under the same seismic design intensity, the functional loss and repair time of the 6-degree (0.05 g) and 7-degree (0.10 g) fortification structures are significantly lower than those of other fortification structures, while the functional loss and repair time of the 7-degree (0.15 g) fortification structure are the largest. The repair rates of structures across different fortification intensities remain approximately equal. As the number of floors increases, the repair time of the structure tends to rise, while the functional loss and repair rate tend to decrease. The research results can provide a reference for the seismic resilience evaluation of offshore urban systems and the realization of the national resilience urban-rural development goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信