意大利和欧洲地震建筑规范的场地特定弹性加速度响应谱的危险相关土壤因素-记录加速度图的更新

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
A. Famà, G. Andreotti, C.G. Lai
{"title":"意大利和欧洲地震建筑规范的场地特定弹性加速度响应谱的危险相关土壤因素-记录加速度图的更新","authors":"A. Famà,&nbsp;G. Andreotti,&nbsp;C.G. Lai","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02200-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Most seismic building codes worldwide allow the definition of the seismic action (horizontal component of ground motion) using a simplified approach based on modifying the ordinates of an elastic acceleration or displacement response spectrum expected on outcropping bedrock through appropriate soil factors. The procedure is only suitable for geotechnically stable soil sites (i.e. non-liquefiable). The details of the method may differ from code to code but, all share the same idea of classifying soil deposits into a restricted number of categories based on the geotechnical characteristics of the soil deposit and the weighted average of the shear wave velocity of the top 30 m (i.e., V<sub>S30</sub>) or a surrogate parameter such as the site’s fundamental period. Finally, specific soil factors are associated with each soil category to scale the ordinates of the elastic response spectrum defined on outcropping bedrock and flat topographic surface. Being a method specifically developed for design, the search for a balance between simplicity and accuracy increases the uncertainty of the results. Recent studies based on analyzing recorded strong motion data and numerical simulations have raised doubts about the reliability of this approach, given the tendency of the current soil factors to either underestimate or overestimate the horizontal acceleration at the free surface of the soil deposit. If, onto one hand, the underestimation of the seismic action is related to the level of safety, on the other hand, the overestimation of the seismic action may lead to overdesign with an increase in construction costs. In 2018 the authors of this paper have published an article on this journal on assessing the reliability of current Eurocode 8 and the Italian building code (NTC18) soil factors using the results of a large number of numerical simulations. In this paper the same authors update their 2018 study by including strong motion data from real recordings. Updated hazard-dependent soil factors for Eurocode 8 and the Italian building code (NTC18) are defined by complementing numerical and real ground motion data. The role of epistemic uncertainty in specifying soil amplification factors is highlighted also through a comparison with soil factors calculated from other international building codes (e.g. 2021 IBC and ASCE 7–16) and recent publications.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 13","pages":"5191 - 5227"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hazard-dependent soil factors for site-specific elastic acceleration response spectra of Italian and European seismic building codes – an update from recorded accelerograms\",\"authors\":\"A. Famà,&nbsp;G. Andreotti,&nbsp;C.G. Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02200-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Most seismic building codes worldwide allow the definition of the seismic action (horizontal component of ground motion) using a simplified approach based on modifying the ordinates of an elastic acceleration or displacement response spectrum expected on outcropping bedrock through appropriate soil factors. The procedure is only suitable for geotechnically stable soil sites (i.e. non-liquefiable). The details of the method may differ from code to code but, all share the same idea of classifying soil deposits into a restricted number of categories based on the geotechnical characteristics of the soil deposit and the weighted average of the shear wave velocity of the top 30 m (i.e., V<sub>S30</sub>) or a surrogate parameter such as the site’s fundamental period. Finally, specific soil factors are associated with each soil category to scale the ordinates of the elastic response spectrum defined on outcropping bedrock and flat topographic surface. Being a method specifically developed for design, the search for a balance between simplicity and accuracy increases the uncertainty of the results. Recent studies based on analyzing recorded strong motion data and numerical simulations have raised doubts about the reliability of this approach, given the tendency of the current soil factors to either underestimate or overestimate the horizontal acceleration at the free surface of the soil deposit. If, onto one hand, the underestimation of the seismic action is related to the level of safety, on the other hand, the overestimation of the seismic action may lead to overdesign with an increase in construction costs. In 2018 the authors of this paper have published an article on this journal on assessing the reliability of current Eurocode 8 and the Italian building code (NTC18) soil factors using the results of a large number of numerical simulations. In this paper the same authors update their 2018 study by including strong motion data from real recordings. Updated hazard-dependent soil factors for Eurocode 8 and the Italian building code (NTC18) are defined by complementing numerical and real ground motion data. The role of epistemic uncertainty in specifying soil amplification factors is highlighted also through a comparison with soil factors calculated from other international building codes (e.g. 2021 IBC and ASCE 7–16) and recent publications.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 13\",\"pages\":\"5191 - 5227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02200-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02200-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界上大多数抗震建筑规范都允许使用一种简化的方法来定义地震作用(地面运动的水平分量),该方法基于通过适当的土壤因素修改露头基岩上预期的弹性加速度或位移响应谱的坐标。该程序仅适用于地质技术稳定的土壤场地(即不可液化)。该方法的细节可能因规范而异,但都有相同的想法,即根据土壤沉积物的岩土力学特征和前30米剪切波速的加权平均值(即VS30)或替代参数(如场地的基本周期)将土壤沉积物分类为有限数量的类别。最后,将特定的土壤因子与每个土壤类别相关联,以确定在露头基岩和平坦地形表面上定义的弹性响应谱的坐标。作为一种专门为设计而开发的方法,在简单性和准确性之间寻求平衡增加了结果的不确定性。最近基于分析记录的强运动数据和数值模拟的研究对这种方法的可靠性提出了质疑,因为当前的土壤因素倾向于低估或高估土壤沉积物自由表面的水平加速度。如果地震作用的低估与安全水平有关,另一方面,地震作用的高估可能导致过度设计,增加建设成本。2018年,本文作者在本刊上发表了一篇文章,利用大量数值模拟的结果评估了现行欧洲规范8和意大利建筑规范(NTC18)土壤因素的可靠性。在这篇论文中,同样的作者更新了他们2018年的研究,纳入了来自真实录音的强运动数据。更新了欧洲规范8和意大利建筑规范(NTC18)的危险相关土壤因子,通过补充数值和实际地面运动数据来定义。通过与其他国际建筑规范(例如2021 IBC和ASCE 7-16)和最近出版物计算的土壤因子进行比较,还强调了在指定土壤放大因子方面认识不确定性的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Hazard-dependent soil factors for site-specific elastic acceleration response spectra of Italian and European seismic building codes – an update from recorded accelerograms

Hazard-dependent soil factors for site-specific elastic acceleration response spectra of Italian and European seismic building codes – an update from recorded accelerograms

Most seismic building codes worldwide allow the definition of the seismic action (horizontal component of ground motion) using a simplified approach based on modifying the ordinates of an elastic acceleration or displacement response spectrum expected on outcropping bedrock through appropriate soil factors. The procedure is only suitable for geotechnically stable soil sites (i.e. non-liquefiable). The details of the method may differ from code to code but, all share the same idea of classifying soil deposits into a restricted number of categories based on the geotechnical characteristics of the soil deposit and the weighted average of the shear wave velocity of the top 30 m (i.e., VS30) or a surrogate parameter such as the site’s fundamental period. Finally, specific soil factors are associated with each soil category to scale the ordinates of the elastic response spectrum defined on outcropping bedrock and flat topographic surface. Being a method specifically developed for design, the search for a balance between simplicity and accuracy increases the uncertainty of the results. Recent studies based on analyzing recorded strong motion data and numerical simulations have raised doubts about the reliability of this approach, given the tendency of the current soil factors to either underestimate or overestimate the horizontal acceleration at the free surface of the soil deposit. If, onto one hand, the underestimation of the seismic action is related to the level of safety, on the other hand, the overestimation of the seismic action may lead to overdesign with an increase in construction costs. In 2018 the authors of this paper have published an article on this journal on assessing the reliability of current Eurocode 8 and the Italian building code (NTC18) soil factors using the results of a large number of numerical simulations. In this paper the same authors update their 2018 study by including strong motion data from real recordings. Updated hazard-dependent soil factors for Eurocode 8 and the Italian building code (NTC18) are defined by complementing numerical and real ground motion data. The role of epistemic uncertainty in specifying soil amplification factors is highlighted also through a comparison with soil factors calculated from other international building codes (e.g. 2021 IBC and ASCE 7–16) and recent publications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信