{"title":"抗震设计挑战：根据第二代欧洲规范8，研究RC墙的弯矩、剪切作用和设计参数","authors":"Helder Maranhão, Humberto Varum, José Melo","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02245-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ongoing revision of Eurocode 8 includes updates encompassing new ductility classifications, limits on damage control, conditions for local ductility, and corresponding detailing guidelines. It is crucial to thoroughly examine and compare these revisions with the existing provisions of Eurocode 8. The present research examines structural behaviour factors (<i>q</i>) for varying strut inclination angles (45° and 22°) and compares them against prEN 1998-1-2:2023 recommendations. Findings reveal consistent overperformance, highlighting the conservative estimations for structural redundancy offered by prEN 1998-1-2:2023. Plastic hinge lengths obtained through nonlinear analysis and FprEN 1998-1-1:2024 calculations are compared, showcasing conservative estimations prioritising safety. Observations indicate distinct trends in tension shift (<i>a</i><sub>l</sub>) and critical height (<i>h</i><sub>cr</sub>) compared to plastic hinge length (<i>l</i><sub>pl</sub>), aligning with conservative approaches outlined in EN 1998–1:2004 and prEN 1998-1-2:2023. Additionally, the observed shear magnification factors (ɛ) may indicate a potential overestimation of shear forces attributed to the amplified effect of higher modes in the inelastic range combined with flexural overstrength.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 13","pages":"5587 - 5623"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02245-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic design challenges: investigating bending moments, shear actions, and design parameters in RC walls according to the second generation of Eurocode 8\",\"authors\":\"Helder Maranhão, Humberto Varum, José Melo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02245-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The ongoing revision of Eurocode 8 includes updates encompassing new ductility classifications, limits on damage control, conditions for local ductility, and corresponding detailing guidelines. It is crucial to thoroughly examine and compare these revisions with the existing provisions of Eurocode 8. The present research examines structural behaviour factors (<i>q</i>) for varying strut inclination angles (45° and 22°) and compares them against prEN 1998-1-2:2023 recommendations. Findings reveal consistent overperformance, highlighting the conservative estimations for structural redundancy offered by prEN 1998-1-2:2023. Plastic hinge lengths obtained through nonlinear analysis and FprEN 1998-1-1:2024 calculations are compared, showcasing conservative estimations prioritising safety. Observations indicate distinct trends in tension shift (<i>a</i><sub>l</sub>) and critical height (<i>h</i><sub>cr</sub>) compared to plastic hinge length (<i>l</i><sub>pl</sub>), aligning with conservative approaches outlined in EN 1998–1:2004 and prEN 1998-1-2:2023. Additionally, the observed shear magnification factors (ɛ) may indicate a potential overestimation of shear forces attributed to the amplified effect of higher modes in the inelastic range combined with flexural overstrength.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 13\",\"pages\":\"5587 - 5623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02245-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02245-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02245-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Seismic design challenges: investigating bending moments, shear actions, and design parameters in RC walls according to the second generation of Eurocode 8
The ongoing revision of Eurocode 8 includes updates encompassing new ductility classifications, limits on damage control, conditions for local ductility, and corresponding detailing guidelines. It is crucial to thoroughly examine and compare these revisions with the existing provisions of Eurocode 8. The present research examines structural behaviour factors (q) for varying strut inclination angles (45° and 22°) and compares them against prEN 1998-1-2:2023 recommendations. Findings reveal consistent overperformance, highlighting the conservative estimations for structural redundancy offered by prEN 1998-1-2:2023. Plastic hinge lengths obtained through nonlinear analysis and FprEN 1998-1-1:2024 calculations are compared, showcasing conservative estimations prioritising safety. Observations indicate distinct trends in tension shift (al) and critical height (hcr) compared to plastic hinge length (lpl), aligning with conservative approaches outlined in EN 1998–1:2004 and prEN 1998-1-2:2023. Additionally, the observed shear magnification factors (ɛ) may indicate a potential overestimation of shear forces attributed to the amplified effect of higher modes in the inelastic range combined with flexural overstrength.
期刊介绍：
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
