生产系统弹性方法的系统文献综述

IF 5.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Héctor Hostos;Virginie Goepp;Patrick Sondi
{"title":"生产系统弹性方法的系统文献综述","authors":"Héctor Hostos;Virginie Goepp;Patrick Sondi","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3606576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digitalization of industrial production systems through the Industry 4.0 paradigm has led to significant gains in efficiency and customization. However, it introduces new vulnerabilities, including heightened cybersecurity risks and increased dependence on network connectivity. Therefore, resilience emerges as a critical capability for maintaining operations and ensuring the recovery of production systems in the face of disruptions. This article presents a systematic literature review on resilience approaches in production systems, crucial for navigating the challenges of Industry 4.0. It adopts a three-perspective framework to analyze existing literature: resilience phases, resilience strategy decision space, and manufacturing system life cycle. The literature is classified into general frameworks, architectures, and methods, providing a structured overview of the field. The analysis reveals several key gaps, such as the need for practical implementation of resilience frameworks, the development of proactive strategies regarding the readiness phase, the exploration of underutilized areas in the resilience strategy decision space and the introduction of alternative resilience representations. The findings underscore the need to consider resilience, beyond a reaction to specific risks, as a broader capability to ensure the recovery of the production systems, and to open the path to new research directions.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"4094-4112"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Literature Review of Resilience Approaches in Production Systems\",\"authors\":\"Héctor Hostos;Virginie Goepp;Patrick Sondi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEM.2025.3606576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The digitalization of industrial production systems through the Industry 4.0 paradigm has led to significant gains in efficiency and customization. However, it introduces new vulnerabilities, including heightened cybersecurity risks and increased dependence on network connectivity. Therefore, resilience emerges as a critical capability for maintaining operations and ensuring the recovery of production systems in the face of disruptions. This article presents a systematic literature review on resilience approaches in production systems, crucial for navigating the challenges of Industry 4.0. It adopts a three-perspective framework to analyze existing literature: resilience phases, resilience strategy decision space, and manufacturing system life cycle. The literature is classified into general frameworks, architectures, and methods, providing a structured overview of the field. The analysis reveals several key gaps, such as the need for practical implementation of resilience frameworks, the development of proactive strategies regarding the readiness phase, the exploration of underutilized areas in the resilience strategy decision space and the introduction of alternative resilience representations. The findings underscore the need to consider resilience, beyond a reaction to specific risks, as a broader capability to ensure the recovery of the production systems, and to open the path to new research directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"4094-4112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11152311/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11152311/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过工业4.0范式实现工业生产系统的数字化,在效率和定制方面取得了显著的进步。然而,它带来了新的漏洞,包括网络安全风险增加和对网络连接的依赖增加。因此,弹性成为维持运营和确保生产系统在面临中断时恢复的关键能力。本文对生产系统中的弹性方法进行了系统的文献综述,这对于应对工业4.0的挑战至关重要。本文采用弹性阶段、弹性战略决策空间和制造系统生命周期三视角框架对已有文献进行分析。文献分为一般框架、体系结构和方法,提供了该领域的结构化概述。分析揭示了几个关键的差距,例如对弹性框架的实际实施的需求,关于准备阶段的主动战略的发展,探索弹性战略决策空间中未充分利用的领域以及引入替代弹性表示。研究结果强调,除了对特定风险的反应之外,有必要将恢复能力视为确保生产系统恢复的更广泛能力,并为新的研究方向开辟道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Literature Review of Resilience Approaches in Production Systems
The digitalization of industrial production systems through the Industry 4.0 paradigm has led to significant gains in efficiency and customization. However, it introduces new vulnerabilities, including heightened cybersecurity risks and increased dependence on network connectivity. Therefore, resilience emerges as a critical capability for maintaining operations and ensuring the recovery of production systems in the face of disruptions. This article presents a systematic literature review on resilience approaches in production systems, crucial for navigating the challenges of Industry 4.0. It adopts a three-perspective framework to analyze existing literature: resilience phases, resilience strategy decision space, and manufacturing system life cycle. The literature is classified into general frameworks, architectures, and methods, providing a structured overview of the field. The analysis reveals several key gaps, such as the need for practical implementation of resilience frameworks, the development of proactive strategies regarding the readiness phase, the exploration of underutilized areas in the resilience strategy decision space and the introduction of alternative resilience representations. The findings underscore the need to consider resilience, beyond a reaction to specific risks, as a broader capability to ensure the recovery of the production systems, and to open the path to new research directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信