为什么B2B平台会失败?工业生态系统中身份、架构和网络效应的缺失环节

IF 5.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Krithika Randhawa;Virginia Springer
{"title":"为什么B2B平台会失败?工业生态系统中身份、架构和网络效应的缺失环节","authors":"Krithika Randhawa;Virginia Springer","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3608116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business-to-business (B2B) platform ecosystems—connecting orchestrators, complementors, and end users—are central to digital transformation in industrial sectors. However, many B2B platforms fail to scale or sustain adoption due to challenges integrating legacy systems with digital technologies, navigating fragmented markets, and aligning diverse stakeholder expectations. While prior research emphasizes material dimensions like technical architecture and network effects, primarily in B2C contexts, the role of sociocognitive dimensions remains underexplored. We address this gap by examining <italic>platform identity</i> and <italic>ecosystem identity</i> as key sociocognitive dimensions that shape how platforms are perceived, trusted, and adopted. Using a multiple-case study of three failed B2B platforms (General Electric’s Predix, Vestas’ Covento, and ADAMOS), we trace how misalignments across identity, architecture, and network effects disrupt coherence, stall adoption, and erode stakeholder commitment. We develop a framework capturing the dynamic interdependencies among sociocognitive (identity), technical (architecture), and market (network effects) dimensions. We demonstrate that platform and ecosystem identities are distinct yet interdependent constructs that mediate alignment between technical and market dimensions. Misalignment in any one dimension can cascade into others, creating negative feedback loops that compromise ecosystem scalability and resilience. These insights challenge dominant assumptions in engineering management that prioritize technical system optimization in isolation. By foregrounding identity as a strategic lever, we contribute a more holistic understanding of B2B platform performance and offer actionable guidance for platform orchestrators and engineering managers. To build scalable and coherent platform ecosystems, firms must align material and sociocognitive elements to foster trust, commitment, and sustained adoption in complex B2B environments.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"4079-4093"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Do B2B Platforms Fail? The Missing Links in Identity, Architecture, and Network Effects in Industrial Ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"Krithika Randhawa;Virginia Springer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEM.2025.3608116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Business-to-business (B2B) platform ecosystems—connecting orchestrators, complementors, and end users—are central to digital transformation in industrial sectors. However, many B2B platforms fail to scale or sustain adoption due to challenges integrating legacy systems with digital technologies, navigating fragmented markets, and aligning diverse stakeholder expectations. While prior research emphasizes material dimensions like technical architecture and network effects, primarily in B2C contexts, the role of sociocognitive dimensions remains underexplored. We address this gap by examining <italic>platform identity</i> and <italic>ecosystem identity</i> as key sociocognitive dimensions that shape how platforms are perceived, trusted, and adopted. Using a multiple-case study of three failed B2B platforms (General Electric’s Predix, Vestas’ Covento, and ADAMOS), we trace how misalignments across identity, architecture, and network effects disrupt coherence, stall adoption, and erode stakeholder commitment. We develop a framework capturing the dynamic interdependencies among sociocognitive (identity), technical (architecture), and market (network effects) dimensions. We demonstrate that platform and ecosystem identities are distinct yet interdependent constructs that mediate alignment between technical and market dimensions. Misalignment in any one dimension can cascade into others, creating negative feedback loops that compromise ecosystem scalability and resilience. These insights challenge dominant assumptions in engineering management that prioritize technical system optimization in isolation. By foregrounding identity as a strategic lever, we contribute a more holistic understanding of B2B platform performance and offer actionable guidance for platform orchestrators and engineering managers. To build scalable and coherent platform ecosystems, firms must align material and sociocognitive elements to foster trust, commitment, and sustained adoption in complex B2B environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"4079-4093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11157744/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11157744/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业对企业(B2B)平台生态系统——连接协调者、互补者和最终用户——是工业部门数字化转型的核心。然而,由于将遗留系统与数字技术集成、引导分散的市场以及协调不同的利益相关者期望等挑战,许多B2B平台无法扩展或维持采用。虽然先前的研究强调物质维度,如技术架构和网络效应,主要是在B2C背景下,社会认知维度的作用仍未得到充分探索。我们通过将平台身份和生态系统身份作为影响平台感知、信任和采用方式的关键社会认知维度来研究这一差距。通过对三个失败的B2B平台(通用电气的Predix、维斯塔斯的Covento和ADAMOS)的多案例研究,我们追踪了身份、架构和网络效应之间的错位是如何破坏一致性、阻碍采用和侵蚀利益相关者的承诺的。我们开发了一个框架,捕捉社会认知(身份)、技术(架构)和市场(网络效应)维度之间的动态相互依赖关系。我们证明了平台和生态系统的身份是不同的,但相互依存的结构,调解技术和市场维度之间的一致性。任何一个维度的偏差都可能波及到其他维度,形成负面反馈循环,损害生态系统的可扩展性和弹性。这些见解挑战了工程管理中优先考虑技术系统优化的主流假设。通过突出身份作为战略杠杆,我们有助于更全面地了解B2B平台的性能,并为平台编排人员和工程经理提供可操作的指导。为了构建可扩展和连贯的平台生态系统,企业必须将物质和社会认知元素结合起来,以促进信任、承诺和在复杂的B2B环境中的持续采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Do B2B Platforms Fail? The Missing Links in Identity, Architecture, and Network Effects in Industrial Ecosystems
Business-to-business (B2B) platform ecosystems—connecting orchestrators, complementors, and end users—are central to digital transformation in industrial sectors. However, many B2B platforms fail to scale or sustain adoption due to challenges integrating legacy systems with digital technologies, navigating fragmented markets, and aligning diverse stakeholder expectations. While prior research emphasizes material dimensions like technical architecture and network effects, primarily in B2C contexts, the role of sociocognitive dimensions remains underexplored. We address this gap by examining platform identity and ecosystem identity as key sociocognitive dimensions that shape how platforms are perceived, trusted, and adopted. Using a multiple-case study of three failed B2B platforms (General Electric’s Predix, Vestas’ Covento, and ADAMOS), we trace how misalignments across identity, architecture, and network effects disrupt coherence, stall adoption, and erode stakeholder commitment. We develop a framework capturing the dynamic interdependencies among sociocognitive (identity), technical (architecture), and market (network effects) dimensions. We demonstrate that platform and ecosystem identities are distinct yet interdependent constructs that mediate alignment between technical and market dimensions. Misalignment in any one dimension can cascade into others, creating negative feedback loops that compromise ecosystem scalability and resilience. These insights challenge dominant assumptions in engineering management that prioritize technical system optimization in isolation. By foregrounding identity as a strategic lever, we contribute a more holistic understanding of B2B platform performance and offer actionable guidance for platform orchestrators and engineering managers. To build scalable and coherent platform ecosystems, firms must align material and sociocognitive elements to foster trust, commitment, and sustained adoption in complex B2B environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信