妇女保健创新的非殖民化

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI:10.1136/bmj-2025-085683
Tiffany Nassiri-Ansari, Alana Gall, Samuel Oji Oti, Sawsan Abdulrahim, Emma L M Rhule
{"title":"妇女保健创新的非殖民化","authors":"Tiffany Nassiri-Ansari, Alana Gall, Samuel Oji Oti, Sawsan Abdulrahim, Emma L M Rhule","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2025-085683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tiffany Nassiri-Ansari and colleagues set out how a decolonial feminist approach to innovation could produce greater gender equality and health equity The field of women’s health innovation is growing rapidly, yet it has focused mainly on technological solutions. Despite the global scope and ambition of advocates and innovators, feminist and decolonial perspectives remain largely absent. These perspectives are vital to discover whose voices and priorities shape innovation, and to improve how the field allocates funding, directs investments, and ensures inclusive representation and leadership. For too long, communities have had “innovative” solutions imposed on them under the banners of novelty and progress, without regard for contextual fit1 or alignment with local priorities.2 In addition to being a potential waste of often scarce resources, such interventions often reinforce power imbalances, sustaining top-down decision making and restricting opportunities for affected communities to shape the solutions that affect them. In many cases they have perpetuated, rather than dismantled, the inequities they claim to tackle. Centring decolonial feminist values in gender and health innovation is not a new idea. Where activists, community leaders, researchers, and funders have rejected exclusionary, top-down processes in favour of collective, inclusive ones, tangible improvements in health and wellbeing have followed.3 Building on that tradition, this article, part of the BMJ Collection on Women’s Health Innovation (bmj.com/collections/womens-health-innovation), calls for a deliberate reimagining of how women’s health innovation is defined, developed, and delivered. To understand why such a shift is necessary, it is essential to consider how the enduring structures and logics of coloniality shape health systems, research, and innovation and, in turn, the health and wellbeing of women and gender diverse people worldwide. Coloniality refers to the enduring systems of power, knowledge, and being that emerged from colonisation and which continue to shape the modern world. These structures …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decolonising women’s health innovation\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany Nassiri-Ansari, Alana Gall, Samuel Oji Oti, Sawsan Abdulrahim, Emma L M Rhule\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj-2025-085683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tiffany Nassiri-Ansari and colleagues set out how a decolonial feminist approach to innovation could produce greater gender equality and health equity The field of women’s health innovation is growing rapidly, yet it has focused mainly on technological solutions. Despite the global scope and ambition of advocates and innovators, feminist and decolonial perspectives remain largely absent. These perspectives are vital to discover whose voices and priorities shape innovation, and to improve how the field allocates funding, directs investments, and ensures inclusive representation and leadership. For too long, communities have had “innovative” solutions imposed on them under the banners of novelty and progress, without regard for contextual fit1 or alignment with local priorities.2 In addition to being a potential waste of often scarce resources, such interventions often reinforce power imbalances, sustaining top-down decision making and restricting opportunities for affected communities to shape the solutions that affect them. In many cases they have perpetuated, rather than dismantled, the inequities they claim to tackle. Centring decolonial feminist values in gender and health innovation is not a new idea. Where activists, community leaders, researchers, and funders have rejected exclusionary, top-down processes in favour of collective, inclusive ones, tangible improvements in health and wellbeing have followed.3 Building on that tradition, this article, part of the BMJ Collection on Women’s Health Innovation (bmj.com/collections/womens-health-innovation), calls for a deliberate reimagining of how women’s health innovation is defined, developed, and delivered. To understand why such a shift is necessary, it is essential to consider how the enduring structures and logics of coloniality shape health systems, research, and innovation and, in turn, the health and wellbeing of women and gender diverse people worldwide. Coloniality refers to the enduring systems of power, knowledge, and being that emerged from colonisation and which continue to shape the modern world. These structures …\",\"PeriodicalId\":22388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The BMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2025-085683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2025-085683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Tiffany Nassiri-Ansari及其同事阐述了一种非殖民化的女权主义创新方法如何能够产生更大的性别平等和健康公平。妇女健康创新领域正在迅速发展,但它主要集中在技术解决方案上。尽管倡导者和革新者的视野和雄心遍及全球,但女权主义和非殖民主义观点在很大程度上仍然缺失。这些观点对于发现谁的声音和优先事项影响创新、改善该领域如何分配资金、指导投资、确保包容性代表性和领导力至关重要。长期以来,社区在新奇和进步的旗帜下被强加了“创新”的解决方案,而没有考虑到环境的适应性或与当地优先事项的一致性这种干预措施除了可能浪费往往稀缺的资源外,还常常加剧权力不平衡,维持自上而下的决策,限制受影响社区制定影响其自身的解决方案的机会。在许多情况下,它们非但没有消除,反而使它们声称要解决的不平等现象永久化。将非殖民化的女权主义价值观集中于性别和卫生创新并不是一个新想法。积极分子、社区领袖、研究人员和资助者拒绝了自上而下的排斥性流程,转而支持集体的、包容性的流程,健康和福祉的切实改善随之而来在这一传统的基础上,这篇文章,BMJ女性健康创新文集(bmj.com/collections/womens-health-innovation)的一部分,呼吁对如何定义、发展和交付女性健康创新进行深思熟虑的重新构想。要理解为什么需要这种转变,就必须考虑殖民的持久结构和逻辑如何影响卫生系统、研究和创新,进而影响世界各地妇女和性别多样化人群的健康和福祉。殖民是指殖民时期产生的持久的权力、知识和存在体系,这些体系继续塑造着现代世界。这些结构……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decolonising women’s health innovation
Tiffany Nassiri-Ansari and colleagues set out how a decolonial feminist approach to innovation could produce greater gender equality and health equity The field of women’s health innovation is growing rapidly, yet it has focused mainly on technological solutions. Despite the global scope and ambition of advocates and innovators, feminist and decolonial perspectives remain largely absent. These perspectives are vital to discover whose voices and priorities shape innovation, and to improve how the field allocates funding, directs investments, and ensures inclusive representation and leadership. For too long, communities have had “innovative” solutions imposed on them under the banners of novelty and progress, without regard for contextual fit1 or alignment with local priorities.2 In addition to being a potential waste of often scarce resources, such interventions often reinforce power imbalances, sustaining top-down decision making and restricting opportunities for affected communities to shape the solutions that affect them. In many cases they have perpetuated, rather than dismantled, the inequities they claim to tackle. Centring decolonial feminist values in gender and health innovation is not a new idea. Where activists, community leaders, researchers, and funders have rejected exclusionary, top-down processes in favour of collective, inclusive ones, tangible improvements in health and wellbeing have followed.3 Building on that tradition, this article, part of the BMJ Collection on Women’s Health Innovation (bmj.com/collections/womens-health-innovation), calls for a deliberate reimagining of how women’s health innovation is defined, developed, and delivered. To understand why such a shift is necessary, it is essential to consider how the enduring structures and logics of coloniality shape health systems, research, and innovation and, in turn, the health and wellbeing of women and gender diverse people worldwide. Coloniality refers to the enduring systems of power, knowledge, and being that emerged from colonisation and which continue to shape the modern world. These structures …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信