专题系列导论：考察特殊教育研究基地

IF 2.1 3区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Remedial and Special Education Pub Date : 2025-10-09 DOI:10.1177/07419325251379789

Bryan G. Cook, William J. Therrien

{"title":"专题系列导论：考察特殊教育研究基地","authors":"Bryan G. Cook, William J. Therrien","doi":"10.1177/07419325251379789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This introduction to the special series, Examining the Special Education Research Base, situates the work within broader concerns about questionable research practices and the reproducibility crisis in science. We review lessons from other fields, summarize existing meta-research in special education, and provide an overview of three reviews examining publication bias, selective outcome reporting, and the scarcity of null findings. Shared themes suggest that although the special education field appears to have fewer problems than some disciplines, potential threats to the validity of the special education research base were identified. We conclude by highlighting the implications of the three reviews for research and practice, and calling for the greater adoption of open-science practices to strengthen the evidence base in special education.","PeriodicalId":48042,"journal":{"name":"Remedial and Special Education","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the Special Series: Examining the Special Education Research Base\",\"authors\":\"Bryan G. Cook, William J. Therrien\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07419325251379789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This introduction to the special series, Examining the Special Education Research Base, situates the work within broader concerns about questionable research practices and the reproducibility crisis in science. We review lessons from other fields, summarize existing meta-research in special education, and provide an overview of three reviews examining publication bias, selective outcome reporting, and the scarcity of null findings. Shared themes suggest that although the special education field appears to have fewer problems than some disciplines, potential threats to the validity of the special education research base were identified. We conclude by highlighting the implications of the three reviews for research and practice, and calling for the greater adoption of open-science practices to strengthen the evidence base in special education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remedial and Special Education\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remedial and Special Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325251379789\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remedial and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325251379789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这是对特别系列的介绍，检查特殊教育研究基地，将工作置于对可疑研究实践和科学可重复性危机的更广泛关注中。我们回顾了其他领域的经验教训，总结了现有的特殊教育元研究，并概述了三篇关于发表偏倚、选择性结果报告和零结果稀缺性的综述。共同的主题表明，尽管特殊教育领域的问题似乎比某些学科少，但对特殊教育研究基础有效性的潜在威胁被确定。最后，我们强调了这三篇综述对研究和实践的影响，并呼吁更多地采用开放科学实践来加强特殊教育的证据基础。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Introduction to the Special Series: Examining the Special Education Research Base

This introduction to the special series, Examining the Special Education Research Base, situates the work within broader concerns about questionable research practices and the reproducibility crisis in science. We review lessons from other fields, summarize existing meta-research in special education, and provide an overview of three reviews examining publication bias, selective outcome reporting, and the scarcity of null findings. Shared themes suggest that although the special education field appears to have fewer problems than some disciplines, potential threats to the validity of the special education research base were identified. We conclude by highlighting the implications of the three reviews for research and practice, and calling for the greater adoption of open-science practices to strengthen the evidence base in special education.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Remedial and Special Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Remedial and Special Education (RASE) is devoted to the discussion of issues involving the education of persons for whom typical instruction is not effective. Emphasis is on the interpretation of research literature and recommendations for the practice of remedial and special education. Appropriate topics include, but are not limited to, definition, identification, assessment, characteristics, management, and instruction of underachieving and exceptional children, youth, and adults; related services; family involvement; service delivery systems; legislation; litigation; and professional standards and training.