Nika Žibrat Kalanj, Andreja Prešern, Katerina Naumoska, Tina Snoj, Jana Aupič, Vesna Glavnik, Alen Albreht, Mojca Mally, Jure Derganc, Peter Greimel, Alessandra Magistrato, Gregor Anderluh
{"title":"细胞毒性nep1样蛋白的可塑性使其与脂质受体糖酰肌醇磷酸化神经酰胺的结合具有混杂性","authors":"Nika Žibrat Kalanj, Andreja Prešern, Katerina Naumoska, Tina Snoj, Jana Aupič, Vesna Glavnik, Alen Albreht, Mojca Mally, Jure Derganc, Peter Greimel, Alessandra Magistrato, Gregor Anderluh","doi":"10.1126/sciadv.adw6401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >Interactions between plants and pathogens pose a major challenge for plant health and agriculture. One type of threat comes from widespread cytolysins necrosis- and ethylene-inducing peptide 1–like proteins (NLPs) secreted by microbial pathogens. NLPs disrupt plant membranes through interactions with glycosylinositol phosphorylceramides (GIPCs), but the specificity of these interactions remains unclear. We studied binding and pore formation of NLPs in model membranes with GIPCs derived from dicotyledonous or monocotyledonous plants. Using the cytotoxic NLP 2 from fungus <i>Moniliophthora perniciosa</i> (MpNEP2), we show that membrane binding and damage extend beyond previously studied oomycetal NLPs. Furthermore, NLP<sub>Pya</sub> from the oomycete <i>Pythium aphanidermatum</i> exhibits promiscuous binding with a marked preference for branched GIPC series B lipids. Molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that the structural plasticity of NLP<sub>Pya</sub> provides a rational basis for its interaction with a variety of GIPC headgroups. These results clarify the molecular basis of NLP cytotoxicity and emphasize their role in broad-spectrum pathogenicity.</div>","PeriodicalId":21609,"journal":{"name":"Science Advances","volume":"11 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.science.org/doi/reader/10.1126/sciadv.adw6401","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasticity of the cytotoxic Nep1-like protein enables promiscuity in binding to its lipid receptor glycosylinositol phosphorylceramides\",\"authors\":\"Nika Žibrat Kalanj, Andreja Prešern, Katerina Naumoska, Tina Snoj, Jana Aupič, Vesna Glavnik, Alen Albreht, Mojca Mally, Jure Derganc, Peter Greimel, Alessandra Magistrato, Gregor Anderluh\",\"doi\":\"10.1126/sciadv.adw6401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div >Interactions between plants and pathogens pose a major challenge for plant health and agriculture. One type of threat comes from widespread cytolysins necrosis- and ethylene-inducing peptide 1–like proteins (NLPs) secreted by microbial pathogens. NLPs disrupt plant membranes through interactions with glycosylinositol phosphorylceramides (GIPCs), but the specificity of these interactions remains unclear. We studied binding and pore formation of NLPs in model membranes with GIPCs derived from dicotyledonous or monocotyledonous plants. Using the cytotoxic NLP 2 from fungus <i>Moniliophthora perniciosa</i> (MpNEP2), we show that membrane binding and damage extend beyond previously studied oomycetal NLPs. Furthermore, NLP<sub>Pya</sub> from the oomycete <i>Pythium aphanidermatum</i> exhibits promiscuous binding with a marked preference for branched GIPC series B lipids. Molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that the structural plasticity of NLP<sub>Pya</sub> provides a rational basis for its interaction with a variety of GIPC headgroups. These results clarify the molecular basis of NLP cytotoxicity and emphasize their role in broad-spectrum pathogenicity.</div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Advances\",\"volume\":\"11 41\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.science.org/doi/reader/10.1126/sciadv.adw6401\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adw6401\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Advances","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adw6401","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Plasticity of the cytotoxic Nep1-like protein enables promiscuity in binding to its lipid receptor glycosylinositol phosphorylceramides
Interactions between plants and pathogens pose a major challenge for plant health and agriculture. One type of threat comes from widespread cytolysins necrosis- and ethylene-inducing peptide 1–like proteins (NLPs) secreted by microbial pathogens. NLPs disrupt plant membranes through interactions with glycosylinositol phosphorylceramides (GIPCs), but the specificity of these interactions remains unclear. We studied binding and pore formation of NLPs in model membranes with GIPCs derived from dicotyledonous or monocotyledonous plants. Using the cytotoxic NLP 2 from fungus Moniliophthora perniciosa (MpNEP2), we show that membrane binding and damage extend beyond previously studied oomycetal NLPs. Furthermore, NLPPya from the oomycete Pythium aphanidermatum exhibits promiscuous binding with a marked preference for branched GIPC series B lipids. Molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that the structural plasticity of NLPPya provides a rational basis for its interaction with a variety of GIPC headgroups. These results clarify the molecular basis of NLP cytotoxicity and emphasize their role in broad-spectrum pathogenicity.
期刊介绍:
Science Advances, an open-access journal by AAAS, publishes impactful research in diverse scientific areas. It aims for fair, fast, and expert peer review, providing freely accessible research to readers. Led by distinguished scientists, the journal supports AAAS's mission by extending Science magazine's capacity to identify and promote significant advances. Evolving digital publishing technologies play a crucial role in advancing AAAS's global mission for science communication and benefitting humankind.