根据辐射温度和环境天气预测地表比湿度,用于蒸散模拟:来自南澳大利亚野外站点的经验教训

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Jianfeng Gou , Wenjie Liu , Jessica Thompson , Okke Batelaan , Hailong Wang , Karina Gutierrez , Juliette Woods , Huade Guan
{"title":"根据辐射温度和环境天气预测地表比湿度,用于蒸散模拟:来自南澳大利亚野外站点的经验教训","authors":"Jianfeng Gou ,&nbsp;Wenjie Liu ,&nbsp;Jessica Thompson ,&nbsp;Okke Batelaan ,&nbsp;Hailong Wang ,&nbsp;Karina Gutierrez ,&nbsp;Juliette Woods ,&nbsp;Huade Guan","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Land-surface specific humidity is crucial for estimating evapotranspiration (ET) using the Maximum Entropy Production (MEP) method. However, acquiring relevant data, particularly the spatially varying land-surface specific humidity, can be challenging. Here, we show that the deviation of land-surface specific humidity from the ambient specific humidity can be estimated using surface radiative temperature and ambient micrometeorological variables (referred to as the Tr-Weather method). We tested this method at five sites in South Australia with varying vegetation and topography. The results indicate that the Tr-Weather method generally performs the best for early afternoon. The performance varies with seasons, with better results for summer and autumn. Slope and aspect change the timing of optimal predictions, particularly in areas with significant topographic variations. Additionally, this method effectively predicts spatial distribution of the land-surface specific humidity by integrating drone-derived temperature and ambient meteorological data, with an R² value of 0.96. For MEP-based understory ET modelling, the Tr-Weather method outperforms the substituted specific humidity from nearby weather stations, especially under sunny conditions where the MEP ET model using ambient specific humidity tends to underestimate ET. The method is empirical and was developed based on observations in two different environments, further research is required to extend and validate the Tr-Weather approach over other bioclimate zones. Nevertheless, our findings demonstrate the potential of applying the Tr-Weather method, supported by drones and high-resolution satellite data, to advance MEP-based ET modelling across broader landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"375 ","pages":"Article 110878"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting land-surface specific humidity from radiative temperature and ambient weather for evapotranspiration modelling: Lessons from South Australian field sites\",\"authors\":\"Jianfeng Gou ,&nbsp;Wenjie Liu ,&nbsp;Jessica Thompson ,&nbsp;Okke Batelaan ,&nbsp;Hailong Wang ,&nbsp;Karina Gutierrez ,&nbsp;Juliette Woods ,&nbsp;Huade Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Land-surface specific humidity is crucial for estimating evapotranspiration (ET) using the Maximum Entropy Production (MEP) method. However, acquiring relevant data, particularly the spatially varying land-surface specific humidity, can be challenging. Here, we show that the deviation of land-surface specific humidity from the ambient specific humidity can be estimated using surface radiative temperature and ambient micrometeorological variables (referred to as the Tr-Weather method). We tested this method at five sites in South Australia with varying vegetation and topography. The results indicate that the Tr-Weather method generally performs the best for early afternoon. The performance varies with seasons, with better results for summer and autumn. Slope and aspect change the timing of optimal predictions, particularly in areas with significant topographic variations. Additionally, this method effectively predicts spatial distribution of the land-surface specific humidity by integrating drone-derived temperature and ambient meteorological data, with an R² value of 0.96. For MEP-based understory ET modelling, the Tr-Weather method outperforms the substituted specific humidity from nearby weather stations, especially under sunny conditions where the MEP ET model using ambient specific humidity tends to underestimate ET. The method is empirical and was developed based on observations in two different environments, further research is required to extend and validate the Tr-Weather approach over other bioclimate zones. Nevertheless, our findings demonstrate the potential of applying the Tr-Weather method, supported by drones and high-resolution satellite data, to advance MEP-based ET modelling across broader landscapes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"375 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110878\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325004976\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325004976","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地表比湿度是利用最大熵产法估算蒸散发(ET)的关键。然而,获取相关数据,特别是空间变化的地表比湿度,可能具有挑战性。在这里,我们表明可以使用地表辐射温度和环境微气象变量(称为Tr-Weather方法)来估计地表比湿度与环境比湿度的偏差。我们在南澳大利亚的五个不同植被和地形的地点测试了这种方法。结果表明,Tr-Weather方法一般在下午早些时候效果最好。效果随季节变化,夏秋两季效果较好。坡度和坡向改变了最佳预测的时间,特别是在地形变化显著的地区。此外,该方法通过综合无人机获取的温度和环境气象数据,有效地预测了地表比湿度的空间分布,R²值为0.96。对于基于MEP的林下ET模拟,Tr-Weather方法优于附近气象站替代的比湿度,特别是在阳光条件下,使用环境比湿度的MEP ET模型往往低估了ET。该方法是基于两种不同环境的观测而开发的经验方法,需要进一步研究将Tr-Weather方法扩展和验证到其他生物气候带。然而,我们的研究结果表明,在无人机和高分辨率卫星数据的支持下,应用Tr-Weather方法在更广泛的景观中推进基于mep的ET建模的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting land-surface specific humidity from radiative temperature and ambient weather for evapotranspiration modelling: Lessons from South Australian field sites
Land-surface specific humidity is crucial for estimating evapotranspiration (ET) using the Maximum Entropy Production (MEP) method. However, acquiring relevant data, particularly the spatially varying land-surface specific humidity, can be challenging. Here, we show that the deviation of land-surface specific humidity from the ambient specific humidity can be estimated using surface radiative temperature and ambient micrometeorological variables (referred to as the Tr-Weather method). We tested this method at five sites in South Australia with varying vegetation and topography. The results indicate that the Tr-Weather method generally performs the best for early afternoon. The performance varies with seasons, with better results for summer and autumn. Slope and aspect change the timing of optimal predictions, particularly in areas with significant topographic variations. Additionally, this method effectively predicts spatial distribution of the land-surface specific humidity by integrating drone-derived temperature and ambient meteorological data, with an R² value of 0.96. For MEP-based understory ET modelling, the Tr-Weather method outperforms the substituted specific humidity from nearby weather stations, especially under sunny conditions where the MEP ET model using ambient specific humidity tends to underestimate ET. The method is empirical and was developed based on observations in two different environments, further research is required to extend and validate the Tr-Weather approach over other bioclimate zones. Nevertheless, our findings demonstrate the potential of applying the Tr-Weather method, supported by drones and high-resolution satellite data, to advance MEP-based ET modelling across broader landscapes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信