德国和美国的绿色补贴与生态社会政策的推动

IF 3.8 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Benedikt Bender, Daniel Kinderman
{"title":"德国和美国的绿色补贴与生态社会政策的推动","authors":"Benedikt Bender, Daniel Kinderman","doi":"10.1111/rego.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The climate crisis poses an acute threat to humanity. Eco‐social policy can help mitigate this threat, but eco‐social policy and the green transition are expensive. Our paper contributes to a better understanding of the role that green subsidies play in advancing eco‐social politics and policies. We assert that green subsidies increase the political viability of eco‐social policies. Green subsidies lead trade unions and business organizations to support eco‐social policies, regardless of institutional differences. We illustrate these positive‐sum effect dynamics with a most different systems design that compares green subsidies and eco‐social policies in Germany (subsidies, qualification and training measures, coal phase‐out strategy, green housing) with the United States (climate‐related tax credits, Inflation Reduction Act, and green housing). Based on a content analysis of documents and interviews, our comparison of business organizations and unions in both countries reveals strong and broad support for green subsidies in combination with eco‐social policies. We also discuss the second Trump administration and suggest that green subsidies help advance the green transformation in the face of significant political adversity.","PeriodicalId":21026,"journal":{"name":"Regulation & Governance","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green Subsidies and the Promotion of Eco‐Social Policy in Germany and the United States\",\"authors\":\"Benedikt Bender, Daniel Kinderman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rego.70087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The climate crisis poses an acute threat to humanity. Eco‐social policy can help mitigate this threat, but eco‐social policy and the green transition are expensive. Our paper contributes to a better understanding of the role that green subsidies play in advancing eco‐social politics and policies. We assert that green subsidies increase the political viability of eco‐social policies. Green subsidies lead trade unions and business organizations to support eco‐social policies, regardless of institutional differences. We illustrate these positive‐sum effect dynamics with a most different systems design that compares green subsidies and eco‐social policies in Germany (subsidies, qualification and training measures, coal phase‐out strategy, green housing) with the United States (climate‐related tax credits, Inflation Reduction Act, and green housing). Based on a content analysis of documents and interviews, our comparison of business organizations and unions in both countries reveals strong and broad support for green subsidies in combination with eco‐social policies. We also discuss the second Trump administration and suggest that green subsidies help advance the green transformation in the face of significant political adversity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulation & Governance\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulation & Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70087\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulation & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候危机对人类构成严重威胁。生态社会政策可以帮助缓解这一威胁,但生态社会政策和绿色转型是昂贵的。我们的研究有助于更好地理解绿色补贴在推动生态社会政治和政策方面的作用。我们认为,绿色补贴增加了生态社会政策的政治可行性。绿色补贴引导工会和商业组织支持生态社会政策,而不考虑制度差异。我们通过最不同的系统设计来说明这些正和效应动态,将德国的绿色补贴和生态社会政策(补贴、资格和培训措施、煤炭淘汰战略、绿色住房)与美国的(与气候相关的税收抵免、通货膨胀减少法案和绿色住房)进行比较。基于对文献和访谈的内容分析,我们对两国的商业组织和工会进行了比较,结果显示,绿色补贴与生态社会政策相结合得到了强大而广泛的支持。我们还讨论了第二届特朗普政府,并提出绿色补贴有助于在面临重大政治逆境时推进绿色转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green Subsidies and the Promotion of Eco‐Social Policy in Germany and the United States
The climate crisis poses an acute threat to humanity. Eco‐social policy can help mitigate this threat, but eco‐social policy and the green transition are expensive. Our paper contributes to a better understanding of the role that green subsidies play in advancing eco‐social politics and policies. We assert that green subsidies increase the political viability of eco‐social policies. Green subsidies lead trade unions and business organizations to support eco‐social policies, regardless of institutional differences. We illustrate these positive‐sum effect dynamics with a most different systems design that compares green subsidies and eco‐social policies in Germany (subsidies, qualification and training measures, coal phase‐out strategy, green housing) with the United States (climate‐related tax credits, Inflation Reduction Act, and green housing). Based on a content analysis of documents and interviews, our comparison of business organizations and unions in both countries reveals strong and broad support for green subsidies in combination with eco‐social policies. We also discuss the second Trump administration and suggest that green subsidies help advance the green transformation in the face of significant political adversity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Regulation & Governance serves as the leading platform for the study of regulation and governance by political scientists, lawyers, sociologists, historians, criminologists, psychologists, anthropologists, economists and others. Research on regulation and governance, once fragmented across various disciplines and subject areas, has emerged at the cutting edge of paradigmatic change in the social sciences. Through the peer-reviewed journal Regulation & Governance, we seek to advance discussions between various disciplines about regulation and governance, promote the development of new theoretical and empirical understanding, and serve the growing needs of practitioners for a useful academic reference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信