Ligia Carolina Facin, Igor Pacheco Fiuza Romeiro, Kaushiki Sapahia, Beatriz Austregésilo de Athayde de Hollanda Morais, Juliana Queiroz Vasconcelos Muniz, Juliana Domenes Pereira, Cintia Gomes, Celina Borges Migliavaca, André Zimerman, Andreia Biolo
{"title":"转甲状腺素淀粉样心肌病的疾病改善疗法:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ligia Carolina Facin, Igor Pacheco Fiuza Romeiro, Kaushiki Sapahia, Beatriz Austregésilo de Athayde de Hollanda Morais, Juliana Queiroz Vasconcelos Muniz, Juliana Domenes Pereira, Cintia Gomes, Celina Borges Migliavaca, André Zimerman, Andreia Biolo","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transthyretin (TTR) amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is the most common form of restrictive cardiomyopathy. Emerging pharmacological therapies aim to alter the natural history of disease and delay its advancement. However, data directly comparing the efficacy of different drug classes versus placebo remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review assessed the efficacy of TTR stabilizers and silencers compared with placebo on all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, functional outcomes, and serum levels of the biomarker NT-proBNP in patients with ATTR-CM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through April 2025. Eligible studies compared patisiran, tafamidis, inotersen, revusiran, acoramidis, or vutrisiran to placebo in patients with ATTR-CM. Analyses were stratified by drug class, and statistical significance was set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs involving 2,526 participants were included; 42.5% received TTR stabilizers and 57.5% received TTR silencers. Compared with placebo, TTR stabilizers significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.87; p=0.0006) and hospitalizations (RR: 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.89; p<0,0001). TTR silencers did not significantly reduce mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.37-1.68; p=0.54) or hospitalizations (RR: 1.11; 95% CI 0.83-1.48; p=0.48). Both therapies were associated with improvements in 6-minute walk distance, quality of life, and reductions in serum NT-proBNP levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TTR stabilizers significantly reduced all-cause mortality and hospitalizations in patients with ATTR-CM compared with placebo. These benefits were not observed with TTR silencers, potentially due to shorter follow-up durations in the studies evaluated. Both therapies improved functional status and serum levels of NT-proBNP.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 8","pages":"e20240830"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disease-Modifying Therapies for Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ligia Carolina Facin, Igor Pacheco Fiuza Romeiro, Kaushiki Sapahia, Beatriz Austregésilo de Athayde de Hollanda Morais, Juliana Queiroz Vasconcelos Muniz, Juliana Domenes Pereira, Cintia Gomes, Celina Borges Migliavaca, André Zimerman, Andreia Biolo\",\"doi\":\"10.36660/abc.20240830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transthyretin (TTR) amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is the most common form of restrictive cardiomyopathy. Emerging pharmacological therapies aim to alter the natural history of disease and delay its advancement. However, data directly comparing the efficacy of different drug classes versus placebo remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review assessed the efficacy of TTR stabilizers and silencers compared with placebo on all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, functional outcomes, and serum levels of the biomarker NT-proBNP in patients with ATTR-CM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through April 2025. Eligible studies compared patisiran, tafamidis, inotersen, revusiran, acoramidis, or vutrisiran to placebo in patients with ATTR-CM. Analyses were stratified by drug class, and statistical significance was set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs involving 2,526 participants were included; 42.5% received TTR stabilizers and 57.5% received TTR silencers. Compared with placebo, TTR stabilizers significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.87; p=0.0006) and hospitalizations (RR: 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.89; p<0,0001). TTR silencers did not significantly reduce mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.37-1.68; p=0.54) or hospitalizations (RR: 1.11; 95% CI 0.83-1.48; p=0.48). Both therapies were associated with improvements in 6-minute walk distance, quality of life, and reductions in serum NT-proBNP levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TTR stabilizers significantly reduced all-cause mortality and hospitalizations in patients with ATTR-CM compared with placebo. These benefits were not observed with TTR silencers, potentially due to shorter follow-up durations in the studies evaluated. Both therapies improved functional status and serum levels of NT-proBNP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"volume\":\"122 8\",\"pages\":\"e20240830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:转甲状腺素(TTR)淀粉样心肌病(atr - cm)是最常见的限制性心肌病。新兴的药理学疗法旨在改变疾病的自然历史并延缓其发展。然而,直接比较不同药物类别与安慰剂疗效的数据仍然有限。目的:本系统综述评估了与安慰剂相比,TTR稳定剂和消声器在ATTR-CM患者的全因死亡率、住院率、功能结局和血清生物标志物NT-proBNP水平方面的疗效。方法:综合检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,检索截至2025年4月发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)。符合条件的研究比较了帕西兰、他法米底斯、intertersen、revusiran、acoramidis或vutrisiran与安慰剂在ATTR-CM患者中的疗效。按药物类别进行分层分析,结果具有统计学意义:纳入7项随机对照试验,共纳入2526名受试者;42.5%的人使用了TTR稳定剂,57.5%的人使用了TTR消声器。与安慰剂相比,TTR稳定剂显著降低了atr - cm患者的全因死亡率(RR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.87; p=0.0006)和住院率(RR: 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.89)。结论:与安慰剂相比,TTR稳定剂显著降低了atr - cm患者的全因死亡率和住院率。TTR消声器没有观察到这些益处,可能是由于在评估的研究中随访时间较短。两种治疗方法均可改善功能状态和血清NT-proBNP水平。
Disease-Modifying Therapies for Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: Transthyretin (TTR) amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is the most common form of restrictive cardiomyopathy. Emerging pharmacological therapies aim to alter the natural history of disease and delay its advancement. However, data directly comparing the efficacy of different drug classes versus placebo remain limited.
Objectives: This systematic review assessed the efficacy of TTR stabilizers and silencers compared with placebo on all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, functional outcomes, and serum levels of the biomarker NT-proBNP in patients with ATTR-CM.
Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through April 2025. Eligible studies compared patisiran, tafamidis, inotersen, revusiran, acoramidis, or vutrisiran to placebo in patients with ATTR-CM. Analyses were stratified by drug class, and statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
Results: Seven RCTs involving 2,526 participants were included; 42.5% received TTR stabilizers and 57.5% received TTR silencers. Compared with placebo, TTR stabilizers significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.87; p=0.0006) and hospitalizations (RR: 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.89; p<0,0001). TTR silencers did not significantly reduce mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.37-1.68; p=0.54) or hospitalizations (RR: 1.11; 95% CI 0.83-1.48; p=0.48). Both therapies were associated with improvements in 6-minute walk distance, quality of life, and reductions in serum NT-proBNP levels.
Conclusion: TTR stabilizers significantly reduced all-cause mortality and hospitalizations in patients with ATTR-CM compared with placebo. These benefits were not observed with TTR silencers, potentially due to shorter follow-up durations in the studies evaluated. Both therapies improved functional status and serum levels of NT-proBNP.