重症护理护士的道德脱离:传统内容分析。

IF 3.1 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Ali Khanipour-Kencha, Alun C Jackson, Saba Barati-Rizi, Fatemeh Bahramnezhad
{"title":"重症护理护士的道德脱离:传统内容分析。","authors":"Ali Khanipour-Kencha, Alun C Jackson, Saba Barati-Rizi, Fatemeh Bahramnezhad","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01282-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the high-stakes environment of intensive care units, understanding how nurses navigate moral challenges and engage in ethical decision-making is critical for maintaining patient safety and care quality. One important process in this field is moral disengagement, which is growing in the nursing literature. However, there is a lack of foundational and qualitative studies addressing this issue. This study presents a qualitative content analysis aimed at exploring moral disengagement among nurses working in intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This qualitative study employed conventional content analysis from June to December 2024 in Tehran, Iran. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. Data were collected using in-depth, unstructured interviews at the beginning, followed by semi-structured interviews. Sampling continued until data saturation was reached, resulting in 30 interviews with 25 eligible intensive care unit nurses. The conventional qualitative content analysis approach developed by Graneheim and Lundman was employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three main categories with eight subcategories were identified from the initial 765 codes. The findings revealed three main categories: \"cognitive justification of unethical behavior,\" \"protective strategies for personal security,\" and \"normalization of unconventional practices.\" These categories include subcategories such as \"externalization of responsibility,\" \"moral-cognitive justification,\" \"positive reframing of the event,\" \"preservation of job position and security,\" \"psychological stabilization,\" \"strategic violation of regulations for survival,\" \"reduction of emotional and psychological pressure,\" and \"protective framing of behavior.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals various aspects of moral disengagement among critical care nurses, which can pave the way for future studies to better understand the phenomenon, its related factors, and help with the development of preventive measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"127"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral disengagement in critical care nurses: a conventional content analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Khanipour-Kencha, Alun C Jackson, Saba Barati-Rizi, Fatemeh Bahramnezhad\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12910-025-01282-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the high-stakes environment of intensive care units, understanding how nurses navigate moral challenges and engage in ethical decision-making is critical for maintaining patient safety and care quality. One important process in this field is moral disengagement, which is growing in the nursing literature. However, there is a lack of foundational and qualitative studies addressing this issue. This study presents a qualitative content analysis aimed at exploring moral disengagement among nurses working in intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This qualitative study employed conventional content analysis from June to December 2024 in Tehran, Iran. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. Data were collected using in-depth, unstructured interviews at the beginning, followed by semi-structured interviews. Sampling continued until data saturation was reached, resulting in 30 interviews with 25 eligible intensive care unit nurses. The conventional qualitative content analysis approach developed by Graneheim and Lundman was employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three main categories with eight subcategories were identified from the initial 765 codes. The findings revealed three main categories: \\\"cognitive justification of unethical behavior,\\\" \\\"protective strategies for personal security,\\\" and \\\"normalization of unconventional practices.\\\" These categories include subcategories such as \\\"externalization of responsibility,\\\" \\\"moral-cognitive justification,\\\" \\\"positive reframing of the event,\\\" \\\"preservation of job position and security,\\\" \\\"psychological stabilization,\\\" \\\"strategic violation of regulations for survival,\\\" \\\"reduction of emotional and psychological pressure,\\\" and \\\"protective framing of behavior.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals various aspects of moral disengagement among critical care nurses, which can pave the way for future studies to better understand the phenomenon, its related factors, and help with the development of preventive measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01282-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01282-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鉴于重症监护室的高风险环境,了解护士如何应对道德挑战并参与伦理决策对于维护患者安全和护理质量至关重要。这个领域的一个重要过程是道德脱离,这在护理文献中越来越多。然而,缺乏针对这一问题的基础和定性研究。本研究提出了一个定性的内容分析,旨在探讨道德脱离护士在重症监护病房工作。方法:采用常规含量分析方法,于2024年6月至12月在伊朗德黑兰进行定性研究。采用有目的抽样方法招募参与者。数据收集在开始时使用深度,非结构化访谈,然后是半结构化访谈。抽样继续进行,直到达到数据饱和,对25名符合条件的重症监护病房护士进行了30次访谈。采用Graneheim和Lundman开发的传统定性含量分析方法。结果:从最初的765个编码中鉴定出3个主要类别和8个小类别。调查结果揭示了三个主要类别:“不道德行为的认知辩护”、“个人安全的保护策略”和“非常规做法的正常化”。这些类别包括诸如“责任外部化”、“道德-认知辩护”、“事件的积极重构”、“保住工作地位和安全”、“心理稳定”、“战略性地违反生存规则”、“减少情绪和心理压力”以及“行为的保护性框架”等子类别。结论:本研究揭示了重症护理护士道德脱离的各个方面,为今后的研究更好地了解这一现象及其相关因素,并有助于制定预防措施奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moral disengagement in critical care nurses: a conventional content analysis.

Background: Given the high-stakes environment of intensive care units, understanding how nurses navigate moral challenges and engage in ethical decision-making is critical for maintaining patient safety and care quality. One important process in this field is moral disengagement, which is growing in the nursing literature. However, there is a lack of foundational and qualitative studies addressing this issue. This study presents a qualitative content analysis aimed at exploring moral disengagement among nurses working in intensive care units.

Method: This qualitative study employed conventional content analysis from June to December 2024 in Tehran, Iran. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. Data were collected using in-depth, unstructured interviews at the beginning, followed by semi-structured interviews. Sampling continued until data saturation was reached, resulting in 30 interviews with 25 eligible intensive care unit nurses. The conventional qualitative content analysis approach developed by Graneheim and Lundman was employed.

Results: Three main categories with eight subcategories were identified from the initial 765 codes. The findings revealed three main categories: "cognitive justification of unethical behavior," "protective strategies for personal security," and "normalization of unconventional practices." These categories include subcategories such as "externalization of responsibility," "moral-cognitive justification," "positive reframing of the event," "preservation of job position and security," "psychological stabilization," "strategic violation of regulations for survival," "reduction of emotional and psychological pressure," and "protective framing of behavior."

Conclusion: This study reveals various aspects of moral disengagement among critical care nurses, which can pave the way for future studies to better understand the phenomenon, its related factors, and help with the development of preventive measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信