义齿学理论与实践中的垂直维度(第二部分):从经典方法到数字化创新的义齿学垂直维度确定综述

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-10-06 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.93987
Mostafa I Fayad, Rania Moussa, Nourhan A Ragheb, Yousra Ahmed, Sherif Sultan, Mahmoud R AbdulSalam, Hussein A Ismail, Mohamed O Elboraey, Mohammed H AbdElaziz, Mohamed A Helal
{"title":"义齿学理论与实践中的垂直维度(第二部分):从经典方法到数字化创新的义齿学垂直维度确定综述","authors":"Mostafa I Fayad, Rania Moussa, Nourhan A Ragheb, Yousra Ahmed, Sherif Sultan, Mahmoud R AbdulSalam, Hussein A Ismail, Mohamed O Elboraey, Mohammed H AbdElaziz, Mohamed A Helal","doi":"10.7759/cureus.93987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The determination of vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) represents one of the most challenging and critical aspects of prosthodontic treatment, particularly in edentulous patients. Accurate establishment of VDO is essential for optimal function, esthetics, and patient comfort in prosthetic rehabilitation. This comprehensive literature review aims to analyze the current evidence regarding various methods for determining vertical dimension (VD) in prosthodontic practice, examining their reliability, clinical applicability, and evolution from traditional to modern digital approaches. A search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The search strategy included terms related to VD, prosthodontics, complete dentures, and measurement techniques. A total of 1,259 articles were initially identified, with 903 remaining after duplicates were removed. Following screening and quality assessment, 79 high-quality studies were included in this comprehensive review. The analysis identified two main categories of VDO determination: (a) pre-extraction record methods and (b) post-extraction assessment methods, the latter encompassing anthropometric/biometric approaches, physiological and functional techniques, mechanical methods, measurement devices, radiographic or imaging modalities, and esthetic evaluations. While traditional techniques hold historical value, their reliability and reproducibility remain limited. In contrast, contemporary digital methods offer greater precision and patient comfort, though their use demands advanced equipment and practitioner training. While no single method has emerged as universally superior, the integration of multiple assessment techniques with digital technology offers enhanced accuracy and reproducibility. Contemporary evidence supports a multifactorial approach combining traditional clinical judgment with digital precision and novel radiographic formulas for optimal VDO determination.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 10","pages":"e93987"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vertical Dimension in Prosthodontics Theory and Practice (Part II): A Comprehensive Review of Vertical Dimension Determination in Prosthodontics From Classical Methods to Digital Innovation.\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa I Fayad, Rania Moussa, Nourhan A Ragheb, Yousra Ahmed, Sherif Sultan, Mahmoud R AbdulSalam, Hussein A Ismail, Mohamed O Elboraey, Mohammed H AbdElaziz, Mohamed A Helal\",\"doi\":\"10.7759/cureus.93987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The determination of vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) represents one of the most challenging and critical aspects of prosthodontic treatment, particularly in edentulous patients. Accurate establishment of VDO is essential for optimal function, esthetics, and patient comfort in prosthetic rehabilitation. This comprehensive literature review aims to analyze the current evidence regarding various methods for determining vertical dimension (VD) in prosthodontic practice, examining their reliability, clinical applicability, and evolution from traditional to modern digital approaches. A search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The search strategy included terms related to VD, prosthodontics, complete dentures, and measurement techniques. A total of 1,259 articles were initially identified, with 903 remaining after duplicates were removed. Following screening and quality assessment, 79 high-quality studies were included in this comprehensive review. The analysis identified two main categories of VDO determination: (a) pre-extraction record methods and (b) post-extraction assessment methods, the latter encompassing anthropometric/biometric approaches, physiological and functional techniques, mechanical methods, measurement devices, radiographic or imaging modalities, and esthetic evaluations. While traditional techniques hold historical value, their reliability and reproducibility remain limited. In contrast, contemporary digital methods offer greater precision and patient comfort, though their use demands advanced equipment and practitioner training. While no single method has emerged as universally superior, the integration of multiple assessment techniques with digital technology offers enhanced accuracy and reproducibility. Contemporary evidence supports a multifactorial approach combining traditional clinical judgment with digital precision and novel radiographic formulas for optimal VDO determination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cureus\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"e93987\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501398/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cureus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.93987\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.93987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

咬合垂直尺寸(VDO)的确定是修复治疗中最具挑战性和最关键的方面之一,特别是在无牙患者中。准确地建立VDO是必不可少的最佳功能,美学和患者的舒适度在假肢康复。这篇综合的文献综述旨在分析目前关于修复实践中确定垂直尺寸(VD)的各种方法的证据,检查它们的可靠性,临床适用性以及从传统到现代数字方法的演变。在多个数据库中进行了搜索,包括PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library。搜索策略包括与VD、修复学、全假牙和测量技术相关的术语。最初总共确定了1,259篇文章,在删除重复后剩下903篇。经过筛选和质量评估,本综合综述纳入了79项高质量研究。分析确定了两种主要的VDO测定方法:(a)提取前记录方法和(b)提取后评估方法,后者包括人体测量/生物测量方法、生理和功能技术、机械方法、测量设备、放射摄影或成像方式以及美学评估。虽然传统技术具有历史价值,但其可靠性和可重复性仍然有限。相比之下,现代数字方法提供了更高的精度和患者舒适度,尽管它们的使用需要先进的设备和从业人员培训。虽然没有一种方法是普遍优越的,但多种评估技术与数字技术的集成提供了更高的准确性和可重复性。当代证据支持将传统临床判断与数字精度和新型放射学公式相结合的多因素方法,以获得最佳的VDO测定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vertical Dimension in Prosthodontics Theory and Practice (Part II): A Comprehensive Review of Vertical Dimension Determination in Prosthodontics From Classical Methods to Digital Innovation.

The determination of vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) represents one of the most challenging and critical aspects of prosthodontic treatment, particularly in edentulous patients. Accurate establishment of VDO is essential for optimal function, esthetics, and patient comfort in prosthetic rehabilitation. This comprehensive literature review aims to analyze the current evidence regarding various methods for determining vertical dimension (VD) in prosthodontic practice, examining their reliability, clinical applicability, and evolution from traditional to modern digital approaches. A search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The search strategy included terms related to VD, prosthodontics, complete dentures, and measurement techniques. A total of 1,259 articles were initially identified, with 903 remaining after duplicates were removed. Following screening and quality assessment, 79 high-quality studies were included in this comprehensive review. The analysis identified two main categories of VDO determination: (a) pre-extraction record methods and (b) post-extraction assessment methods, the latter encompassing anthropometric/biometric approaches, physiological and functional techniques, mechanical methods, measurement devices, radiographic or imaging modalities, and esthetic evaluations. While traditional techniques hold historical value, their reliability and reproducibility remain limited. In contrast, contemporary digital methods offer greater precision and patient comfort, though their use demands advanced equipment and practitioner training. While no single method has emerged as universally superior, the integration of multiple assessment techniques with digital technology offers enhanced accuracy and reproducibility. Contemporary evidence supports a multifactorial approach combining traditional clinical judgment with digital precision and novel radiographic formulas for optimal VDO determination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信