从语文数学文本看文本程序与物质操作的相互作用。

IF 0.5 4区 哲学 Q2 Arts and Humanities
Yiwen Zhu
{"title":"从语文数学文本看文本程序与物质操作的相互作用。","authors":"Yiwen Zhu","doi":"10.1017/S0269889725100860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For more than 2,000 years, counting rods were the main tool used in Chinese mathematics. However, direct evidence for their use is lacking. The current evidence is primarily derived from two sources: procedural texts in ancient mathematical writings and counting diagrams drawn with rod signs in thirteenth-century writings. This study analyzes the procedural texts in two ancient Chinese mathematical books: 1) <i>The Nine Chapters on Mathematical Procedures</i>, completed by approximately 100 BCE or 100 CE, and 2) the <i>Mathematical Canon by Master Sun</i>, completed by approximately 400 CE. This article argues that the differences between the texts insufficiently explain the fundamental differences in the operations that could be performed with mathematical rods. Further, by examining two mathematical books from the thirteenth century, namely the <i>Mathematical Book in Nine Chapters</i> written by Qin Jiushao in 1247 and <i>Fast Methods on Various Categories of Multiplication and Division of Areas of Fields</i> written by Yang Hui in , this article argues that the relationships between counting diagrams and their accompanying text vary depending on the author, thereby highlighting authors' different epistemological perspectives. Examining the historical context is essential for understanding the relationship between procedural texts and material operations and for developing new methods to investigate the use of counting rods.</p>","PeriodicalId":49562,"journal":{"name":"Science in Context","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Interplay between Textual Procedures and Material Operations from the Viewpoint of Chinese Mathematical Texts.\",\"authors\":\"Yiwen Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0269889725100860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For more than 2,000 years, counting rods were the main tool used in Chinese mathematics. However, direct evidence for their use is lacking. The current evidence is primarily derived from two sources: procedural texts in ancient mathematical writings and counting diagrams drawn with rod signs in thirteenth-century writings. This study analyzes the procedural texts in two ancient Chinese mathematical books: 1) <i>The Nine Chapters on Mathematical Procedures</i>, completed by approximately 100 BCE or 100 CE, and 2) the <i>Mathematical Canon by Master Sun</i>, completed by approximately 400 CE. This article argues that the differences between the texts insufficiently explain the fundamental differences in the operations that could be performed with mathematical rods. Further, by examining two mathematical books from the thirteenth century, namely the <i>Mathematical Book in Nine Chapters</i> written by Qin Jiushao in 1247 and <i>Fast Methods on Various Categories of Multiplication and Division of Areas of Fields</i> written by Yang Hui in , this article argues that the relationships between counting diagrams and their accompanying text vary depending on the author, thereby highlighting authors' different epistemological perspectives. Examining the historical context is essential for understanding the relationship between procedural texts and material operations and for developing new methods to investigate the use of counting rods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science in Context\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889725100860\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in Context","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889725100860","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两千多年来,数棒一直是中国数学的主要工具。然而,缺乏使用它们的直接证据。目前的证据主要来自两个来源:古代数学著作中的程序文本和13世纪著作中用杆状符号绘制的计数图。本研究分析了两本中国古代数学书籍中的程序文本:1)大约在公元前100年或公元100年完成的《九章数学程序》,以及2)大约在公元400年完成的孙大师的《数学经》。本文认为,文本之间的差异不足以解释可以用数学棒执行的操作的根本差异。此外,本文通过对秦九韶(1247年)的《九章数学书》和杨辉(1247年)的《多类乘除田的快速方法》两本13世纪数学专著的考察,认为计数图与随文之间的关系因作者而异,从而凸显了作者不同的认识论观点。检查历史背景对于理解程序文本和材料操作之间的关系以及开发新方法来调查计数棒的使用是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Interplay between Textual Procedures and Material Operations from the Viewpoint of Chinese Mathematical Texts.

For more than 2,000 years, counting rods were the main tool used in Chinese mathematics. However, direct evidence for their use is lacking. The current evidence is primarily derived from two sources: procedural texts in ancient mathematical writings and counting diagrams drawn with rod signs in thirteenth-century writings. This study analyzes the procedural texts in two ancient Chinese mathematical books: 1) The Nine Chapters on Mathematical Procedures, completed by approximately 100 BCE or 100 CE, and 2) the Mathematical Canon by Master Sun, completed by approximately 400 CE. This article argues that the differences between the texts insufficiently explain the fundamental differences in the operations that could be performed with mathematical rods. Further, by examining two mathematical books from the thirteenth century, namely the Mathematical Book in Nine Chapters written by Qin Jiushao in 1247 and Fast Methods on Various Categories of Multiplication and Division of Areas of Fields written by Yang Hui in , this article argues that the relationships between counting diagrams and their accompanying text vary depending on the author, thereby highlighting authors' different epistemological perspectives. Examining the historical context is essential for understanding the relationship between procedural texts and material operations and for developing new methods to investigate the use of counting rods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science in Context
Science in Context 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science in Context is an international journal edited at The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University, with the support of the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. It is devoted to the study of the sciences from the points of view of comparative epistemology and historical sociology of scientific knowledge. The journal is committed to an interdisciplinary approach to the study of science and its cultural development - it does not segregate considerations drawn from history, philosophy and sociology. Controversies within scientific knowledge and debates about methodology are presented in their contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信