综合形态学和系统发育数据,揭示了葱属植物的分类困惑、系统发育不一致和隐种。

IF 6.2 2区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Cladistics Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI:10.1111/cla.70012
Yuan Wang, Rui-Yu Cheng, Wei-Yan Tan, Jia-Hui Sun, Jin-Bo Tan, Yan Yu, Song-Dong Zhou, Xing-Jin He, Deng-Feng Xie
{"title":"综合形态学和系统发育数据,揭示了葱属植物的分类困惑、系统发育不一致和隐种。","authors":"Yuan Wang, Rui-Yu Cheng, Wei-Yan Tan, Jia-Hui Sun, Jin-Bo Tan, Yan Yu, Song-Dong Zhou, Xing-Jin He, Deng-Feng Xie","doi":"10.1111/cla.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phylogenomic data from enriched informative loci yield higher resolution insights for clarifying taxonomic relationships and reconstructing the evolutionary histories of complex taxa. Section Bromatorrhiza (Allium, Amaryllidaceae), a small taxon of 11 species, has long been plagued by taxonomic controversies and persistent, unresolved phylogenetic incongruence. Here, we collected transcriptome and plastome data from 34 samples representing multiple populations across all species in this section. From these, 1993 low-copy nuclear genes and 110 plastid genes were extracted for phylogenetic reconstruction. Integrating phylogenomic and morphological approaches, we investigated species relationships and the causes of phylogenetic discordance. Our results provide robust clarification of interspecific relationships and identify 10 diagnostic morphological traits in this section. The Allium hookeri Alliance (AHA) was resolved as a monophyletic clade comprising seven species. We elevated Allium hookeri var. muliense to species status, formally describing it as A. muliense, and newly describe a cryptic species as Allium xui Y. Wang, D.F. Xie & X.J. He, sp. nov. Furthermore, we demonstrate that extensive phylogenetic discordance within this section is primarily attributable to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and reticulate evolution. By synthesizing phylogenetic and morphological evidence, we propose refined taxonomic treatments. Our findings resolve long-standing taxonomic ambiguities and phylogenetic discordance in section Bromatorrhiza.</p>","PeriodicalId":50688,"journal":{"name":"Cladistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating morphological and phylogenomic data reveals the taxonomic puzzles, incongruence in phylogenies and cryptic species in Allium section Bromatorrhiza Ekberg.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Wang, Rui-Yu Cheng, Wei-Yan Tan, Jia-Hui Sun, Jin-Bo Tan, Yan Yu, Song-Dong Zhou, Xing-Jin He, Deng-Feng Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cla.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Phylogenomic data from enriched informative loci yield higher resolution insights for clarifying taxonomic relationships and reconstructing the evolutionary histories of complex taxa. Section Bromatorrhiza (Allium, Amaryllidaceae), a small taxon of 11 species, has long been plagued by taxonomic controversies and persistent, unresolved phylogenetic incongruence. Here, we collected transcriptome and plastome data from 34 samples representing multiple populations across all species in this section. From these, 1993 low-copy nuclear genes and 110 plastid genes were extracted for phylogenetic reconstruction. Integrating phylogenomic and morphological approaches, we investigated species relationships and the causes of phylogenetic discordance. Our results provide robust clarification of interspecific relationships and identify 10 diagnostic morphological traits in this section. The Allium hookeri Alliance (AHA) was resolved as a monophyletic clade comprising seven species. We elevated Allium hookeri var. muliense to species status, formally describing it as A. muliense, and newly describe a cryptic species as Allium xui Y. Wang, D.F. Xie & X.J. He, sp. nov. Furthermore, we demonstrate that extensive phylogenetic discordance within this section is primarily attributable to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and reticulate evolution. By synthesizing phylogenetic and morphological evidence, we propose refined taxonomic treatments. Our findings resolve long-standing taxonomic ambiguities and phylogenetic discordance in section Bromatorrhiza.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cladistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cladistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.70012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cladistics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自丰富的信息位点的系统基因组数据为澄清分类关系和重建复杂分类群的进化史提供了更高的分辨率。葱属(Allium, Amaryllidaceae)是一个有11种的小分类群,长期以来一直受到分类争议和持续的未解决的系统发育不一致的困扰。在这里,我们收集了来自34个样本的转录组和质体组数据,这些样本代表了本节所有物种的多个种群。从中提取了1993个低拷贝核基因和110个质体基因进行系统发育重建。结合系统发育学和形态学的方法,我们研究了物种关系和系统发育不一致的原因。我们的结果提供了强有力的澄清种间关系,并确定了10个诊断形态学特征在这部分。葱属(Allium hookeri Alliance, AHA)是由7个物种组成的单系进化枝。本文将Allium hookeri var. mulliense提升到物种地位,正式命名为a . mulliense,并将一个隐种命名为Allium。王旭英,谢东峰,何晓军,sp. 11 .此外,我们还证明了该部分广泛的系统发育不一致主要归因于不完全谱系分类(ILS)和网状进化。通过综合系统发育和形态学证据,我们提出了精细的分类处理方法。我们的发现解决了长期存在的分类歧义和系统发育不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating morphological and phylogenomic data reveals the taxonomic puzzles, incongruence in phylogenies and cryptic species in Allium section Bromatorrhiza Ekberg.

Phylogenomic data from enriched informative loci yield higher resolution insights for clarifying taxonomic relationships and reconstructing the evolutionary histories of complex taxa. Section Bromatorrhiza (Allium, Amaryllidaceae), a small taxon of 11 species, has long been plagued by taxonomic controversies and persistent, unresolved phylogenetic incongruence. Here, we collected transcriptome and plastome data from 34 samples representing multiple populations across all species in this section. From these, 1993 low-copy nuclear genes and 110 plastid genes were extracted for phylogenetic reconstruction. Integrating phylogenomic and morphological approaches, we investigated species relationships and the causes of phylogenetic discordance. Our results provide robust clarification of interspecific relationships and identify 10 diagnostic morphological traits in this section. The Allium hookeri Alliance (AHA) was resolved as a monophyletic clade comprising seven species. We elevated Allium hookeri var. muliense to species status, formally describing it as A. muliense, and newly describe a cryptic species as Allium xui Y. Wang, D.F. Xie & X.J. He, sp. nov. Furthermore, we demonstrate that extensive phylogenetic discordance within this section is primarily attributable to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and reticulate evolution. By synthesizing phylogenetic and morphological evidence, we propose refined taxonomic treatments. Our findings resolve long-standing taxonomic ambiguities and phylogenetic discordance in section Bromatorrhiza.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cladistics
Cladistics 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Cladistics publishes high quality research papers on systematics, encouraging debate on all aspects of the field, from philosophy, theory and methodology to empirical studies and applications in biogeography, coevolution, conservation biology, ontogeny, genomics and paleontology. Cladistics is read by scientists working in the research fields of evolution, systematics and integrative biology and enjoys a consistently high position in the ISI® rankings for evolutionary biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信