单侧双门静脉内窥镜椎间盘切除术治疗远外侧腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果:回顾性比较研究。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Shuo Yuan, Ziqian Ma, Ruiyuan Chen, Aobo Wang, Yu Xi, Tianyi Wang, Ning Fan, Peng Du, Lei Zang
{"title":"单侧双门静脉内窥镜椎间盘切除术治疗远外侧腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果:回顾性比较研究。","authors":"Shuo Yuan, Ziqian Ma, Ruiyuan Chen, Aobo Wang, Yu Xi, Tianyi Wang, Ning Fan, Peng Du, Lei Zang","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03210-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBED) in patients with far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 25 patients with single-level FLLDH who underwent UBED between April 2023 and January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, while 30 patients with paracentral LDH served as the control group. Primary outcomes were assessed using operation time, hospital stay, volume of drainage, complications, postoperative hospitalization duration, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for back pain (VAS-BP) and leg pain (VAS-LP), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria. Demographic, symptom-related, and radiographic data were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative VAS-LP scores were significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In the study group, the ODI, VAS-BP, and VAS-LP scores showed a significant decrease from preoperative values, indicating notable improvement (p < 0.05). Mean operative time was 96.4 min, and mean hospital stay time was 6.44 days. Graded by Macnab criteria, 22 (88%) of patients had good to excellent outcomes. There were no significant differences in complication rates or patient satisfaction between the two groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant deterioration in disc degeneration and adjacent segment degeneration was observed in either group (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FLLDH poses significant challenges in both diagnosis and surgical management for surgeons. UBED treatment can yield outcomes comparable to those seen in more common types of LDH, providing a safe and effective treatment for FLLDH with favorable surgical results, minimal complications, and sustained pain relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Shuo Yuan, Ziqian Ma, Ruiyuan Chen, Aobo Wang, Yu Xi, Tianyi Wang, Ning Fan, Peng Du, Lei Zang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-025-03210-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBED) in patients with far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 25 patients with single-level FLLDH who underwent UBED between April 2023 and January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, while 30 patients with paracentral LDH served as the control group. Primary outcomes were assessed using operation time, hospital stay, volume of drainage, complications, postoperative hospitalization duration, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for back pain (VAS-BP) and leg pain (VAS-LP), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria. Demographic, symptom-related, and radiographic data were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative VAS-LP scores were significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In the study group, the ODI, VAS-BP, and VAS-LP scores showed a significant decrease from preoperative values, indicating notable improvement (p < 0.05). Mean operative time was 96.4 min, and mean hospital stay time was 6.44 days. Graded by Macnab criteria, 22 (88%) of patients had good to excellent outcomes. There were no significant differences in complication rates or patient satisfaction between the two groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant deterioration in disc degeneration and adjacent segment degeneration was observed in either group (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FLLDH poses significant challenges in both diagnosis and surgical management for surgeons. UBED treatment can yield outcomes comparable to those seen in more common types of LDH, providing a safe and effective treatment for FLLDH with favorable surgical results, minimal complications, and sustained pain relief.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03210-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03210-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性研究旨在评价单侧双门静脉内窥镜椎间盘切除术(UBED)治疗远外侧腰椎间盘突出症(FLLDH)的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2023年4月至2024年1月间行UBED治疗的25例单级FLLDH患者,30例旁中心LDH患者为对照组。主要结局通过手术时间、住院时间、引流量、并发症、术后住院时间、背部疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS- bp)和腿部疼痛(VAS- lp)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和修改后的MacNab标准进行评估。还分析了人口统计学、症状相关和放射学数据。结果:研究组术前VAS-LP评分明显高于对照组(p < 0.05)。两组患者椎间盘退变及邻近节段退变均无明显恶化(p < 0.05)。结论:FLLDH对外科医生的诊断和手术治疗都提出了重大挑战。UBED治疗可以产生与更常见类型LDH相当的结果,为FLLDH提供安全有效的治疗,具有良好的手术效果,最小的并发症和持续的疼痛缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective comparative study.

Purpose: This retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBED) in patients with far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH).

Methods: A total of 25 patients with single-level FLLDH who underwent UBED between April 2023 and January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, while 30 patients with paracentral LDH served as the control group. Primary outcomes were assessed using operation time, hospital stay, volume of drainage, complications, postoperative hospitalization duration, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for back pain (VAS-BP) and leg pain (VAS-LP), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria. Demographic, symptom-related, and radiographic data were also analyzed.

Results: Preoperative VAS-LP scores were significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In the study group, the ODI, VAS-BP, and VAS-LP scores showed a significant decrease from preoperative values, indicating notable improvement (p < 0.05). Mean operative time was 96.4 min, and mean hospital stay time was 6.44 days. Graded by Macnab criteria, 22 (88%) of patients had good to excellent outcomes. There were no significant differences in complication rates or patient satisfaction between the two groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant deterioration in disc degeneration and adjacent segment degeneration was observed in either group (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: FLLDH poses significant challenges in both diagnosis and surgical management for surgeons. UBED treatment can yield outcomes comparable to those seen in more common types of LDH, providing a safe and effective treatment for FLLDH with favorable surgical results, minimal complications, and sustained pain relief.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信