Primary caregiver-reported family resilience in children with cancer in central China: a latent profile analysis.

Background: Childhood cancer can disrupt family functioning, increase caregiver psychological distress, and impair caregiver quality of life. While family resilience is crucial for adaptation, most research has focused on individual-level factors, neglecting heterogeneity and multilevel influences on family resilience.

Methods: Guided by the Social Ecological Model (SEM), this cross-sectional observational study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify distinct profiles of family resilience among caregivers of children with cancer and to explore factors associated with these profiles. Between July 2022 and March 2024, 292 caregivers were recruited. Family resilience was measured using the Family Resilience Assessment Scale. LPA was employed to identify resilience profiles, and binary logistic regression was used to explore influencing factors.

Results: Two latent profiles were identified: the Low Resources-Low Positivity profile (86%) and the High Internal Resilience profile (14%). The Low Resource-Low Positivity profile demonstrated generally lower scores, especially in utilizing social and economic resources and maintaining a positive outlook. The High Internal Resilience profile showed higher scores across all family resilience dimensions, particularly in communication/problem solving, positive outlook, and meaning-making, while the use of external social and economic resources remained relatively lower. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between profiles in residence, number of siblings, caregiver education, individual resilience, social support, caregivers' physical and psychological well-being and child communication (caregiver-reported). Binary logistic regression identified having more than one child (OR = 3.184, 95% CI: 1.437 ~ 7.057, P = 0.004) and higher individual resilience (OR = 1.095, 95% CI: 1.028 ~ 1.165, P = 0.005) as significant predictors of High Internal Resilience profile.

Conclusion: This study identified two distinct family resilience profiles among caregivers of children with cancer. Limited use of social and economic resources was common, while caregiver resilience and having multiple children predicted higher family resilience. Interventions should enhance caregiver coping capacity, support one-child families through peer and family programs, and improve access to social support, flexible employment, and affordable care to strengthen family resilience.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.