老年患者合并症的分类及其亚型:数据驱动的聚类分析。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2025-10-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S549148
Xiuqi Qiao, Xinda Chen, Weihao Wang, Lixin Guo, Qi Pan
{"title":"老年患者合并症的分类及其亚型:数据驱动的聚类分析。","authors":"Xiuqi Qiao, Xinda Chen, Weihao Wang, Lixin Guo, Qi Pan","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S549148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the precise classification of elderly patients with multimorbidity and identify subgroups with an increased prevalence of related diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A data-driven clustering analysis (K-means clustering) was conducted on individuals aged 60 years or older with comorbidities. The clustering was based on five essential and routinely measured variables: body mass index (BMI), intrinsic capacity (IC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Logistic regression models were used to compare the prevalence of diabetes, coronary heart disease, hypertension, osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and frailty among the clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 350 elderly patients with a mean age of 78.74 ± 8.27 years were included. Four subtypes of elderly patients with multimorbidity were identified, with significant differences in disease prevalence observed among the groups. Specifically, cluster 1 included 70 participants who exhibited the highest levels of LDL-c and BMI, as well as relatively higher IC scores. Cluster 2 consisted of 117 participants, who had the highest IC scores among all clusters and similar BMI levels to cluster 1. Cluster 3 included 77 participants and was distinguished by the highest SBP levels. Cluster 4, comprising 86 participants, had the lowest IC and BMI levels. Compared with cluster 2, cluster 4 had significantly higher prevalence of hypertension and frailty. Cluster 3 and 4 had higher prevalence of coronary heart disease compared with cluster 1, and cluster 4 had the highest prevalence of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is significant pathophysiological heterogeneity among individuals with elderly multimorbidity. This classification method provides a crucial foundation for understanding disease complexity in this population. Future research, including intervention studies based on these classifications, is needed to evaluate their potential clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"20 ","pages":"1671-1680"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of Elderly Patients with Comorbidities and Their Subtypes: A Data-Driven Cluster Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xiuqi Qiao, Xinda Chen, Weihao Wang, Lixin Guo, Qi Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CIA.S549148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the precise classification of elderly patients with multimorbidity and identify subgroups with an increased prevalence of related diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A data-driven clustering analysis (K-means clustering) was conducted on individuals aged 60 years or older with comorbidities. The clustering was based on five essential and routinely measured variables: body mass index (BMI), intrinsic capacity (IC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Logistic regression models were used to compare the prevalence of diabetes, coronary heart disease, hypertension, osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and frailty among the clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 350 elderly patients with a mean age of 78.74 ± 8.27 years were included. Four subtypes of elderly patients with multimorbidity were identified, with significant differences in disease prevalence observed among the groups. Specifically, cluster 1 included 70 participants who exhibited the highest levels of LDL-c and BMI, as well as relatively higher IC scores. Cluster 2 consisted of 117 participants, who had the highest IC scores among all clusters and similar BMI levels to cluster 1. Cluster 3 included 77 participants and was distinguished by the highest SBP levels. Cluster 4, comprising 86 participants, had the lowest IC and BMI levels. Compared with cluster 2, cluster 4 had significantly higher prevalence of hypertension and frailty. Cluster 3 and 4 had higher prevalence of coronary heart disease compared with cluster 1, and cluster 4 had the highest prevalence of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is significant pathophysiological heterogeneity among individuals with elderly multimorbidity. This classification method provides a crucial foundation for understanding disease complexity in this population. Future research, including intervention studies based on these classifications, is needed to evaluate their potential clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Interventions in Aging\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"1671-1680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502974/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Interventions in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S549148\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S549148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:探讨老年多病患者的精确分类,确定相关疾病发病率增高的亚群。方法:采用数据驱动的聚类分析(K-means聚类)对60岁及以上合并合并症的患者进行分析。聚类基于五个基本和常规测量的变量:身体质量指数(BMI)、内在容量(IC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-c)、空腹血糖(FPG)和收缩压(SBP)。采用Logistic回归模型比较各组间糖尿病、冠心病、高血压、骨质疏松症、肌肉减少症和虚弱的患病率。结果:共纳入老年患者350例,平均年龄78.74±8.27岁。老年多病患者分为4个亚型,组间患病率差异有统计学意义。具体来说,第1组包括70名参与者,他们表现出最高水平的LDL-c和BMI,以及相对较高的IC评分。第2组由117名参与者组成,他们在所有组中具有最高的IC得分,并且与第1组的BMI水平相似。第3组包括77名参与者,以最高的收缩压水平区分。第4组包括86名参与者,其IC和BMI水平最低。与第2类相比,第4类高血压和虚弱的患病率明显高于第2类。第3类和第4类的冠心病患病率高于第1类,第4类的骨质疏松症和肌肉减少症患病率最高。结论:老年多病患者存在明显的病理生理异质性。这种分类方法为了解这一人群的疾病复杂性提供了重要的基础。未来的研究,包括基于这些分类的干预研究,需要评估其潜在的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Classification of Elderly Patients with Comorbidities and Their Subtypes: A Data-Driven Cluster Analysis.

Classification of Elderly Patients with Comorbidities and Their Subtypes: A Data-Driven Cluster Analysis.

Classification of Elderly Patients with Comorbidities and Their Subtypes: A Data-Driven Cluster Analysis.

Classification of Elderly Patients with Comorbidities and Their Subtypes: A Data-Driven Cluster Analysis.

Background: To explore the precise classification of elderly patients with multimorbidity and identify subgroups with an increased prevalence of related diseases.

Methods: A data-driven clustering analysis (K-means clustering) was conducted on individuals aged 60 years or older with comorbidities. The clustering was based on five essential and routinely measured variables: body mass index (BMI), intrinsic capacity (IC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Logistic regression models were used to compare the prevalence of diabetes, coronary heart disease, hypertension, osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and frailty among the clusters.

Results: A total of 350 elderly patients with a mean age of 78.74 ± 8.27 years were included. Four subtypes of elderly patients with multimorbidity were identified, with significant differences in disease prevalence observed among the groups. Specifically, cluster 1 included 70 participants who exhibited the highest levels of LDL-c and BMI, as well as relatively higher IC scores. Cluster 2 consisted of 117 participants, who had the highest IC scores among all clusters and similar BMI levels to cluster 1. Cluster 3 included 77 participants and was distinguished by the highest SBP levels. Cluster 4, comprising 86 participants, had the lowest IC and BMI levels. Compared with cluster 2, cluster 4 had significantly higher prevalence of hypertension and frailty. Cluster 3 and 4 had higher prevalence of coronary heart disease compared with cluster 1, and cluster 4 had the highest prevalence of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Conclusion: There is significant pathophysiological heterogeneity among individuals with elderly multimorbidity. This classification method provides a crucial foundation for understanding disease complexity in this population. Future research, including intervention studies based on these classifications, is needed to evaluate their potential clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信