娱乐性大麻使用对鼻窦疾病的相关影响。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Zain Mehdi, Heli Majeethia, Jagan M. R. Dwarampudi, Aatin K. Dhanda, Meher Gajula, Lexi Goehring, Faizaan Khan, Roshan Dongre, Franklin Wu, Renjie Hu, Michael T. Yim, Masayoshi Takashima, Omar G. Ahmed
{"title":"娱乐性大麻使用对鼻窦疾病的相关影响。","authors":"Zain Mehdi,&nbsp;Heli Majeethia,&nbsp;Jagan M. R. Dwarampudi,&nbsp;Aatin K. Dhanda,&nbsp;Meher Gajula,&nbsp;Lexi Goehring,&nbsp;Faizaan Khan,&nbsp;Roshan Dongre,&nbsp;Franklin Wu,&nbsp;Renjie Hu,&nbsp;Michael T. Yim,&nbsp;Masayoshi Takashima,&nbsp;Omar G. Ahmed","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective(s)</h3>\n \n <p>With growing cannabis use in the US, it is crucial to understand the impact of recreational use on sinonasal diseases like chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic rhinitis (AR), and chronic rhinitis (CR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study leveraged the NIH AllOfUs database to query patient surveys assessing cannabis usage frequency (lifetime never, monthly, weekly, or daily within the past 3 months) and consumption route (smoking or non-smoking). Cannabis users were matched to never users for demographics, healthcare visit frequency, and insurance. A stringent logistic regression model calculated odds ratios (OR) of developing AR, CRS, or CR after survey completion. Cox regression hazard ratios (HR) compared consumption routes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-five thousand one hundred sixty-four cannabis users were matched with 113,418 never users. Users demonstrated significantly lower odds of AR, CRS, and CR than never users. For CRS, the ORs compared to never users are as follows: daily users 0.64 (95% CI 0.53–0.78), weekly users 0.61 (95% CI 0.48–0.77), and monthly users 0.80. For AR, the ORs were 0.64 (95% CI 0.58–0.71) for daily users, 0.62 (95% CI 0.54–0.71) for weekly users, and 0.69 (95% CI 0.58–0.80) for monthly users. For CR, the ORs were 0.61 (95% CI 0.47–0.79) for daily users, 0.64 (95% CI 0.47–0.87) for weekly users, and 0.41 (95% CI 0.26–0.65) for monthly users. There was no significant difference between smokers and non-smokers (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.27–1.5).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There is an inverse, associative relationship between cannabis use and sinonasal disease. This relationship is insufficiently understood, and there remain significant concerns about the impact of cannabis use, especially smoking, on airway pathologies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>4.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Associative Impact of Recreational Cannabis Use on Sinonasal Diseases\",\"authors\":\"Zain Mehdi,&nbsp;Heli Majeethia,&nbsp;Jagan M. R. Dwarampudi,&nbsp;Aatin K. Dhanda,&nbsp;Meher Gajula,&nbsp;Lexi Goehring,&nbsp;Faizaan Khan,&nbsp;Roshan Dongre,&nbsp;Franklin Wu,&nbsp;Renjie Hu,&nbsp;Michael T. Yim,&nbsp;Masayoshi Takashima,&nbsp;Omar G. Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.70261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective(s)</h3>\\n \\n <p>With growing cannabis use in the US, it is crucial to understand the impact of recreational use on sinonasal diseases like chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic rhinitis (AR), and chronic rhinitis (CR).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This cross-sectional study leveraged the NIH AllOfUs database to query patient surveys assessing cannabis usage frequency (lifetime never, monthly, weekly, or daily within the past 3 months) and consumption route (smoking or non-smoking). Cannabis users were matched to never users for demographics, healthcare visit frequency, and insurance. A stringent logistic regression model calculated odds ratios (OR) of developing AR, CRS, or CR after survey completion. Cox regression hazard ratios (HR) compared consumption routes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-five thousand one hundred sixty-four cannabis users were matched with 113,418 never users. Users demonstrated significantly lower odds of AR, CRS, and CR than never users. For CRS, the ORs compared to never users are as follows: daily users 0.64 (95% CI 0.53–0.78), weekly users 0.61 (95% CI 0.48–0.77), and monthly users 0.80. For AR, the ORs were 0.64 (95% CI 0.58–0.71) for daily users, 0.62 (95% CI 0.54–0.71) for weekly users, and 0.69 (95% CI 0.58–0.80) for monthly users. For CR, the ORs were 0.61 (95% CI 0.47–0.79) for daily users, 0.64 (95% CI 0.47–0.87) for weekly users, and 0.41 (95% CI 0.26–0.65) for monthly users. There was no significant difference between smokers and non-smokers (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.27–1.5).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is an inverse, associative relationship between cannabis use and sinonasal disease. This relationship is insufficiently understood, and there remain significant concerns about the impact of cannabis use, especially smoking, on airway pathologies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>4.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501759/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70261\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着美国大麻使用量的增长,了解娱乐性使用对慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)、过敏性鼻炎(AR)和慢性鼻炎(CR)等鼻窦疾病的影响至关重要。方法:本横断面研究利用NIH AllOfUs数据库查询评估大麻使用频率(过去3个月内从不,每月,每周或每天)和消费途径(吸烟或不吸烟)的患者调查。大麻使用者与从未使用者在人口统计、医疗保健访问频率和保险方面进行了匹配。严格的logistic回归模型计算了调查完成后发生AR、CRS或CR的比值比(OR)。Cox回归风险比(HR)比较消费途径。结果:25,164名大麻使用者与113,418名从不使用大麻的人相匹配。使用者发生AR、CRS和CR的几率明显低于从不使用者。对于CRS,与从不使用用户相比的or值如下:每日用户0.64 (95% CI 0.53-0.78),每周用户0.61 (95% CI 0.48-0.77),每月用户0.80。对于AR,每日用户的or值为0.64 (95% CI 0.58-0.71),每周用户的or值为0.62 (95% CI 0.54-0.71),每月用户的or值为0.69 (95% CI 0.58-0.80)。对于CR,每日用户的or值为0.61 (95% CI 0.47-0.79),每周用户的or值为0.64 (95% CI 0.47-0.87),每月用户的or值为0.41 (95% CI 0.26-0.65)。吸烟者和非吸烟者之间无显著差异(HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.27-1.5)。结论:大麻使用与鼻窦疾病呈负相关关系。人们对这种关系的了解还不够充分,大麻的使用,特别是吸烟对气道病变的影响仍然令人担忧。证据等级:4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Associative Impact of Recreational Cannabis Use on Sinonasal Diseases

The Associative Impact of Recreational Cannabis Use on Sinonasal Diseases

Objective(s)

With growing cannabis use in the US, it is crucial to understand the impact of recreational use on sinonasal diseases like chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic rhinitis (AR), and chronic rhinitis (CR).

Methods

This cross-sectional study leveraged the NIH AllOfUs database to query patient surveys assessing cannabis usage frequency (lifetime never, monthly, weekly, or daily within the past 3 months) and consumption route (smoking or non-smoking). Cannabis users were matched to never users for demographics, healthcare visit frequency, and insurance. A stringent logistic regression model calculated odds ratios (OR) of developing AR, CRS, or CR after survey completion. Cox regression hazard ratios (HR) compared consumption routes.

Results

Twenty-five thousand one hundred sixty-four cannabis users were matched with 113,418 never users. Users demonstrated significantly lower odds of AR, CRS, and CR than never users. For CRS, the ORs compared to never users are as follows: daily users 0.64 (95% CI 0.53–0.78), weekly users 0.61 (95% CI 0.48–0.77), and monthly users 0.80. For AR, the ORs were 0.64 (95% CI 0.58–0.71) for daily users, 0.62 (95% CI 0.54–0.71) for weekly users, and 0.69 (95% CI 0.58–0.80) for monthly users. For CR, the ORs were 0.61 (95% CI 0.47–0.79) for daily users, 0.64 (95% CI 0.47–0.87) for weekly users, and 0.41 (95% CI 0.26–0.65) for monthly users. There was no significant difference between smokers and non-smokers (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.27–1.5).

Conclusion

There is an inverse, associative relationship between cannabis use and sinonasal disease. This relationship is insufficiently understood, and there remain significant concerns about the impact of cannabis use, especially smoking, on airway pathologies.

Level of Evidence

4.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信