印度医学生普遍人性价值观的演变——横断面研究

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sameera Talat, B Gayathri, Athira Gopinath
{"title":"印度医学生普遍人性价值观的演变——横断面研究","authors":"Sameera Talat, B Gayathri, Athira Gopinath","doi":"10.1177/23821205251370213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of higher education, particularly in the medical fields, is to serve humanity, and reflect on core values such as compassion, care, and empathy. This study examines how medical students uphold moral values as they progress through their education, addressing a research gap in the Indian context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After obtaining Institutional Ethics Committee approval, a cross-sectional survey was conducted using a self-administered Google questionnaire. Content validity was ensured through consultations with 5 experts, and reliability was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .75. Data were collected from medical students in India using snowball sampling and analyzed using median, interquartile range, chi-squared test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and multiple regression analysis. The sample size was set at 518, taking into account the nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1500 invites, 526 students responded, which corresponds to a response rate of 35.06%. Reliability analysis revealed a high internal consistency (α = <b>.927</b>), and the data were suitable for factor analysis (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.929). Principal component analysis identified three factors: Authority and Materialism, Enjoyment and Adventure, and Ethics and altruism, which explained 56% of the variance. Significant gender differences in Ethics and altruism were found. Correlation analysis revealed moderate positive relationships between authority and materialism and both enjoyment and adventure and ethics and altruism. Multiple regression showed that authority and materialism significantly impacts ethics and altruism (β = 0.684, <i>p</i> < .001), whereas enjoyment and adventure had a nonsignificant influence. Women performed better than men in ethics and altruism. This finding is discussed taking into account the unequal gender distribution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows that medical students prioritize ethics and altruism over authority and materialism, with enjoyment and adventure playing a balancing role. The significant influence of authority and materialism on ethics and altruism suggests that competitive and materialistic values influence ethical priorities. Understanding how different factors impact values and well-being can guide educators and policymakers in fostering ethical practices and supporting student resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251370213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of Universal Human Values Among Medical Students in India-A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sameera Talat, B Gayathri, Athira Gopinath\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23821205251370213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of higher education, particularly in the medical fields, is to serve humanity, and reflect on core values such as compassion, care, and empathy. This study examines how medical students uphold moral values as they progress through their education, addressing a research gap in the Indian context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After obtaining Institutional Ethics Committee approval, a cross-sectional survey was conducted using a self-administered Google questionnaire. Content validity was ensured through consultations with 5 experts, and reliability was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .75. Data were collected from medical students in India using snowball sampling and analyzed using median, interquartile range, chi-squared test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and multiple regression analysis. The sample size was set at 518, taking into account the nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1500 invites, 526 students responded, which corresponds to a response rate of 35.06%. Reliability analysis revealed a high internal consistency (α = <b>.927</b>), and the data were suitable for factor analysis (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.929). Principal component analysis identified three factors: Authority and Materialism, Enjoyment and Adventure, and Ethics and altruism, which explained 56% of the variance. Significant gender differences in Ethics and altruism were found. Correlation analysis revealed moderate positive relationships between authority and materialism and both enjoyment and adventure and ethics and altruism. Multiple regression showed that authority and materialism significantly impacts ethics and altruism (β = 0.684, <i>p</i> < .001), whereas enjoyment and adventure had a nonsignificant influence. Women performed better than men in ethics and altruism. This finding is discussed taking into account the unequal gender distribution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows that medical students prioritize ethics and altruism over authority and materialism, with enjoyment and adventure playing a balancing role. The significant influence of authority and materialism on ethics and altruism suggests that competitive and materialistic values influence ethical priorities. Understanding how different factors impact values and well-being can guide educators and policymakers in fostering ethical practices and supporting student resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"23821205251370213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501441/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251370213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251370213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:高等教育的目的,特别是在医学领域,是为人类服务,并反映核心价值观,如同情,关怀和同理心。这项研究考察了医学生如何在他们的教育过程中维护道德价值观,解决了印度背景下的研究差距。方法:在获得机构伦理委员会批准后,采用自填谷歌问卷进行横断面调查。通过咨询5位专家来确保内容效度,并以Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.75来确认信度。采用滚雪球抽样法对印度医科学生进行数据收集,采用中位数、四分位差、卡方检验、Pearson相关系数和多元回归分析进行分析。考虑到无应答者,样本量设定为518人。结果:在1500份邀请中,有526名学生回复,回复率为35.06%。信度分析显示内部一致性高(α =。927),数据适合进行因子分析(Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.929)。主成分分析确定了三个因素:权威和物质主义,享受和冒险,道德和利他主义,这解释了56%的差异。在道德和利他行为方面存在显著的性别差异。相关分析显示,权威与物质主义、享乐与冒险、道德与利他之间存在适度的正相关关系。多元回归结果显示,权威和唯物主义对道德和利他主义有显著影响(β = 0.684, p)。结论:研究表明医学生优先考虑道德和利他主义,而不是权威和唯物主义,享受和冒险起平衡作用。权威和物质主义对伦理和利他主义的显著影响表明,竞争和物质主义价值观影响伦理优先事项。了解不同因素如何影响价值观和幸福感,可以指导教育工作者和政策制定者培养道德实践和支持学生的适应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolution of Universal Human Values Among Medical Students in India-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objective: The purpose of higher education, particularly in the medical fields, is to serve humanity, and reflect on core values such as compassion, care, and empathy. This study examines how medical students uphold moral values as they progress through their education, addressing a research gap in the Indian context.

Methods: After obtaining Institutional Ethics Committee approval, a cross-sectional survey was conducted using a self-administered Google questionnaire. Content validity was ensured through consultations with 5 experts, and reliability was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .75. Data were collected from medical students in India using snowball sampling and analyzed using median, interquartile range, chi-squared test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and multiple regression analysis. The sample size was set at 518, taking into account the nonresponders.

Results: Of 1500 invites, 526 students responded, which corresponds to a response rate of 35.06%. Reliability analysis revealed a high internal consistency (α = .927), and the data were suitable for factor analysis (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.929). Principal component analysis identified three factors: Authority and Materialism, Enjoyment and Adventure, and Ethics and altruism, which explained 56% of the variance. Significant gender differences in Ethics and altruism were found. Correlation analysis revealed moderate positive relationships between authority and materialism and both enjoyment and adventure and ethics and altruism. Multiple regression showed that authority and materialism significantly impacts ethics and altruism (β = 0.684, p < .001), whereas enjoyment and adventure had a nonsignificant influence. Women performed better than men in ethics and altruism. This finding is discussed taking into account the unequal gender distribution.

Conclusion: The study shows that medical students prioritize ethics and altruism over authority and materialism, with enjoyment and adventure playing a balancing role. The significant influence of authority and materialism on ethics and altruism suggests that competitive and materialistic values influence ethical priorities. Understanding how different factors impact values and well-being can guide educators and policymakers in fostering ethical practices and supporting student resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信