ChatGPT-4在尼泊尔本科医学执照考试中的表现:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Prajjwol Luitel, Sujan Paudel, Devansh Upadhya, Amit Yadav, Gehendra Jung Kunwar
{"title":"ChatGPT-4在尼泊尔本科医学执照考试中的表现:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Prajjwol Luitel, Sujan Paudel, Devansh Upadhya, Amit Yadav, Gehendra Jung Kunwar","doi":"10.1177/23821205251384836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>ChatGPT has shown remarkable performance in medical licensing examinations such as the United States Medical Licensing Examination. However, limited research exists regarding its performance on national medical licensing exams in low-income countries. In Nepal, where nearly half of the candidates fail the national medical licensing exam, ChatGPT has the potential to contribute to medical education.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate ChatGPT's (GPT-4) performance on the Nepal Medical Council Licensing Medical Examination (NMCLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NMCLE-May 2024 dataset, comprising 900 multiple-choice questions, was used to assess ChatGPT's performance. After excluding 8 questions that contained figures or were not compatible with text-only input, 892 questions were analyzed. Specific prompt, including a background description, question, and choices, was entered. The response generated by ChatGPT was compared taking responses from experienced clinicians as a reference. Descriptive statistics were used to present the results, and regression analysis was employed to determine the association between variables, including set, question type, pattern, and subject, and incorrect responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPT-4 generated 783 correct responses in 892 questions, an accuracy rate of 87.8%. Incorrect responses were more likely with questions requiring logical reasoning (odds ratio 14.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.94-24.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT-4 performs at a standard comparable to or above that of medical graduates on the Nepalese undergraduate medical licensing examination. Incorrect responses were mainly in questions requiring logical reasoning, underscoring the need for caution when relying on its outputs in the same. These findings are encouraging and highlight the need for further studies to evaluate its role as an educational resource in Nepalese medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251384836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the Nepalese Undergraduate Medical Licensing Examination: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Prajjwol Luitel, Sujan Paudel, Devansh Upadhya, Amit Yadav, Gehendra Jung Kunwar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23821205251384836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>ChatGPT has shown remarkable performance in medical licensing examinations such as the United States Medical Licensing Examination. However, limited research exists regarding its performance on national medical licensing exams in low-income countries. In Nepal, where nearly half of the candidates fail the national medical licensing exam, ChatGPT has the potential to contribute to medical education.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate ChatGPT's (GPT-4) performance on the Nepal Medical Council Licensing Medical Examination (NMCLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NMCLE-May 2024 dataset, comprising 900 multiple-choice questions, was used to assess ChatGPT's performance. After excluding 8 questions that contained figures or were not compatible with text-only input, 892 questions were analyzed. Specific prompt, including a background description, question, and choices, was entered. The response generated by ChatGPT was compared taking responses from experienced clinicians as a reference. Descriptive statistics were used to present the results, and regression analysis was employed to determine the association between variables, including set, question type, pattern, and subject, and incorrect responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPT-4 generated 783 correct responses in 892 questions, an accuracy rate of 87.8%. Incorrect responses were more likely with questions requiring logical reasoning (odds ratio 14.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.94-24.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT-4 performs at a standard comparable to or above that of medical graduates on the Nepalese undergraduate medical licensing examination. Incorrect responses were mainly in questions requiring logical reasoning, underscoring the need for caution when relying on its outputs in the same. These findings are encouraging and highlight the need for further studies to evaluate its role as an educational resource in Nepalese medical education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"23821205251384836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501450/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251384836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251384836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:ChatGPT在美国医疗执照考试等医疗执照考试中表现出色。然而,关于它在低收入国家的国家医疗执照考试中的表现的研究有限。在尼泊尔,近一半的候选人未能通过全国医疗执照考试,ChatGPT有可能为医学教育做出贡献。目的:评价ChatGPT (GPT-4)在尼泊尔医学委员会执照医学考试(NMCLE)中的表现。方法:使用NMCLE-May 2024数据集,包括900个选择题,来评估ChatGPT的性能。在排除了8个包含数字或与纯文字输入不兼容的问题后,共分析了892个问题。输入特定的提示,包括背景描述、问题和选择。ChatGPT产生的反应与经验丰富的临床医生的反应作为参考进行比较。使用描述性统计来呈现结果,并使用回归分析来确定变量(包括集合、问题类型、模式和主题)与错误回答之间的关联。结果:GPT-4在892个问题中产生783个正确答案,正确率为87.8%。需要逻辑推理的问题更容易出现错误回答(优势比14.7,95%可信区间[CI] 8.94-24.16)。结论:ChatGPT-4的表现与尼泊尔本科医学执照考试的医学毕业生的水平相当或更高。不正确的回答主要是在需要逻辑推理的问题上,强调在依赖其在同一领域的产出时需要谨慎。这些发现令人鼓舞,并强调需要进一步研究以评估其在尼泊尔医学教育中作为教育资源的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the Nepalese Undergraduate Medical Licensing Examination: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction: ChatGPT has shown remarkable performance in medical licensing examinations such as the United States Medical Licensing Examination. However, limited research exists regarding its performance on national medical licensing exams in low-income countries. In Nepal, where nearly half of the candidates fail the national medical licensing exam, ChatGPT has the potential to contribute to medical education.

Objective: To evaluate ChatGPT's (GPT-4) performance on the Nepal Medical Council Licensing Medical Examination (NMCLE).

Methods: The NMCLE-May 2024 dataset, comprising 900 multiple-choice questions, was used to assess ChatGPT's performance. After excluding 8 questions that contained figures or were not compatible with text-only input, 892 questions were analyzed. Specific prompt, including a background description, question, and choices, was entered. The response generated by ChatGPT was compared taking responses from experienced clinicians as a reference. Descriptive statistics were used to present the results, and regression analysis was employed to determine the association between variables, including set, question type, pattern, and subject, and incorrect responses.

Results: GPT-4 generated 783 correct responses in 892 questions, an accuracy rate of 87.8%. Incorrect responses were more likely with questions requiring logical reasoning (odds ratio 14.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.94-24.16).

Conclusions: ChatGPT-4 performs at a standard comparable to or above that of medical graduates on the Nepalese undergraduate medical licensing examination. Incorrect responses were mainly in questions requiring logical reasoning, underscoring the need for caution when relying on its outputs in the same. These findings are encouraging and highlight the need for further studies to evaluate its role as an educational resource in Nepalese medical education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信