不参加随机临床试验的原因和患者对膝关节骨关节炎治疗的偏好。

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-10-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735251383853
Andrea Carland, Nomi Weiss-Laxer, Moriah Martindale, Alexandra DiVasta, Michael Freitas, Mohammad Nadir Haider, Leslie Bisson
{"title":"不参加随机临床试验的原因和患者对膝关节骨关节炎治疗的偏好。","authors":"Andrea Carland, Nomi Weiss-Laxer, Moriah Martindale, Alexandra DiVasta, Michael Freitas, Mohammad Nadir Haider, Leslie Bisson","doi":"10.1177/23743735251383853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Research Purpose:</b> Low enrollment in randomized control trials (RCTs) poses a threat to external validity. We conducted a secondary analysis to identify factors associated with patients' decisions to enroll in an RCT of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) treatments (injection, physical therapy, or combination). We assessed the extent to which demographic characteristics, treatment preferences, and history varied by patients' decisions to enroll. Among those who declined, we examined patterns in their treatment decisions. <b>Major Findings:</b> Among those who declined (<i>n</i> = 124), treatment history was associated with treatment decisions. Patients receiving injections had the highest BMI, patients receiving PT had the highest proportion of prior surgery, and treatment naïve patients had the highest proportion of PT referrals. Reasons for declining enrollment included strong treatment preference, unwillingness to be randomized, and logistics. Treatment preferences and treatment history appear to be associated with RCT enrollment. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings from our secondary analysis could inform future KOA research by encouraging researchers to consider treatment preferences and randomization tolerance. We make suggestions for improvement of study enrollment, such as patient advocacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735251383853"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reasons for Not Enrolling in a Randomized Clinical Trial and Patient Preferences for Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Carland, Nomi Weiss-Laxer, Moriah Martindale, Alexandra DiVasta, Michael Freitas, Mohammad Nadir Haider, Leslie Bisson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23743735251383853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Research Purpose:</b> Low enrollment in randomized control trials (RCTs) poses a threat to external validity. We conducted a secondary analysis to identify factors associated with patients' decisions to enroll in an RCT of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) treatments (injection, physical therapy, or combination). We assessed the extent to which demographic characteristics, treatment preferences, and history varied by patients' decisions to enroll. Among those who declined, we examined patterns in their treatment decisions. <b>Major Findings:</b> Among those who declined (<i>n</i> = 124), treatment history was associated with treatment decisions. Patients receiving injections had the highest BMI, patients receiving PT had the highest proportion of prior surgery, and treatment naïve patients had the highest proportion of PT referrals. Reasons for declining enrollment included strong treatment preference, unwillingness to be randomized, and logistics. Treatment preferences and treatment history appear to be associated with RCT enrollment. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings from our secondary analysis could inform future KOA research by encouraging researchers to consider treatment preferences and randomization tolerance. We make suggestions for improvement of study enrollment, such as patient advocacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"23743735251383853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501443/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251383853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251383853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:随机对照试验(rct)的低入组率对外部效度构成威胁。我们进行了二次分析,以确定与患者决定参加膝骨关节炎(KOA)治疗(注射、物理治疗或联合治疗)的RCT相关的因素。我们评估了人口统计学特征、治疗偏好和病史随患者入组决定的变化程度。在那些拒绝接受治疗的患者中,我们检查了他们的治疗决定模式。主要发现:在拒绝治疗的患者中(n = 124),治疗史与治疗决定相关。接受注射的患者BMI最高,接受PT的患者既往手术比例最高,接受naïve治疗的患者PT转诊比例最高。入组人数下降的原因包括治疗偏好强、不愿意随机化和后勤问题。治疗偏好和治疗史似乎与RCT入组有关。结论:我们的二次分析结果可以鼓励研究人员考虑治疗偏好和随机化耐受性,从而为未来的KOA研究提供信息。我们提出了改善研究入组的建议,如患者倡导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reasons for Not Enrolling in a Randomized Clinical Trial and Patient Preferences for Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment.

Reasons for Not Enrolling in a Randomized Clinical Trial and Patient Preferences for Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment.

Reasons for Not Enrolling in a Randomized Clinical Trial and Patient Preferences for Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment.

Research Purpose: Low enrollment in randomized control trials (RCTs) poses a threat to external validity. We conducted a secondary analysis to identify factors associated with patients' decisions to enroll in an RCT of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) treatments (injection, physical therapy, or combination). We assessed the extent to which demographic characteristics, treatment preferences, and history varied by patients' decisions to enroll. Among those who declined, we examined patterns in their treatment decisions. Major Findings: Among those who declined (n = 124), treatment history was associated with treatment decisions. Patients receiving injections had the highest BMI, patients receiving PT had the highest proportion of prior surgery, and treatment naïve patients had the highest proportion of PT referrals. Reasons for declining enrollment included strong treatment preference, unwillingness to be randomized, and logistics. Treatment preferences and treatment history appear to be associated with RCT enrollment. Conclusions: Findings from our secondary analysis could inform future KOA research by encouraging researchers to consider treatment preferences and randomization tolerance. We make suggestions for improvement of study enrollment, such as patient advocacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信