硅橡胶带在猫睾丸切除术中替代缝合结扎的疗效和灭菌弹性。

IF 2 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Veterinary World Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-30 DOI:10.14202/vetworld.2025.2553-2562
Natnaree Raekriang, Panpicha Sattasathuchana, Naris Thengchaisri
{"title":"硅橡胶带在猫睾丸切除术中替代缝合结扎的疗效和灭菌弹性。","authors":"Natnaree Raekriang, Panpicha Sattasathuchana, Naris Thengchaisri","doi":"10.14202/vetworld.2025.2553-2562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Suture ligation is the standard technique for feline orchiectomy, but it requires surgical expertise and is time-consuming. Silicone rubber bands (SRBs), previously used in human procedures, offer a potential alternative. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the effects of common veterinary sterilization methods on the mechanical integrity of SRBs and (2) compare the surgical outcomes of SRB versus suture ligation in feline orchiectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-eight: SRBs were randomly assigned to four sterilization groups: No sterilization (control), 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, autoclaving, and hydrogen peroxide gas plasma. Bands were tested for ultimate tensile strength (UTS), elongation at break, and elastic modulus using a universal testing machine. Separately, 20 healthy male cats were randomly assigned to undergo orchiectomy using either SRB ligation (n = 10) or traditional suture ligation (n = 10). Surgical time, intraoperative/post-operative complications, Glasgow composite measure pain scale scores, wound healing, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were monitored for 10 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilization preserved SRB elasticity without significantly affecting UTS, while autoclaving and chlorhexidine treatment increased stiffness and reduced elongation at break (p < 0.05). SRB ligation significantly reduced surgical time (3.06 ± 0.32 min) compared to suture ligation (4.48 ± 0.62 min; p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in post-operative pain scores, wound healing characteristics, or complication rates between groups (p > 0.05). Mild GI symptoms were observed in both groups but were not statistically different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SRB ligation is a viable, time-efficient, and clinically comparable alternative to traditional suture ligation in feline orchiectomy. Hydrogen peroxide gas plasma is recommended for SRB sterilization due to its minimal impact on material integrity. This technique may be especially beneficial in high-volume or resource-limited settings, offering a safe, efficient approach to feline population control. Future research should evaluate the long-term biocompatibility and broader surgical applications of SRBs in veterinary practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23587,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary World","volume":"18 8","pages":"2553-2562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and sterilization resilience of silicone rubber bands as an alternative to suture ligation in feline orchiectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Natnaree Raekriang, Panpicha Sattasathuchana, Naris Thengchaisri\",\"doi\":\"10.14202/vetworld.2025.2553-2562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Suture ligation is the standard technique for feline orchiectomy, but it requires surgical expertise and is time-consuming. Silicone rubber bands (SRBs), previously used in human procedures, offer a potential alternative. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the effects of common veterinary sterilization methods on the mechanical integrity of SRBs and (2) compare the surgical outcomes of SRB versus suture ligation in feline orchiectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-eight: SRBs were randomly assigned to four sterilization groups: No sterilization (control), 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, autoclaving, and hydrogen peroxide gas plasma. Bands were tested for ultimate tensile strength (UTS), elongation at break, and elastic modulus using a universal testing machine. Separately, 20 healthy male cats were randomly assigned to undergo orchiectomy using either SRB ligation (n = 10) or traditional suture ligation (n = 10). Surgical time, intraoperative/post-operative complications, Glasgow composite measure pain scale scores, wound healing, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were monitored for 10 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilization preserved SRB elasticity without significantly affecting UTS, while autoclaving and chlorhexidine treatment increased stiffness and reduced elongation at break (p < 0.05). SRB ligation significantly reduced surgical time (3.06 ± 0.32 min) compared to suture ligation (4.48 ± 0.62 min; p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in post-operative pain scores, wound healing characteristics, or complication rates between groups (p > 0.05). Mild GI symptoms were observed in both groups but were not statistically different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SRB ligation is a viable, time-efficient, and clinically comparable alternative to traditional suture ligation in feline orchiectomy. Hydrogen peroxide gas plasma is recommended for SRB sterilization due to its minimal impact on material integrity. This technique may be especially beneficial in high-volume or resource-limited settings, offering a safe, efficient approach to feline population control. Future research should evaluate the long-term biocompatibility and broader surgical applications of SRBs in veterinary practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary World\",\"volume\":\"18 8\",\"pages\":\"2553-2562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501543/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2025.2553-2562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2025.2553-2562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:缝合结扎是猫睾丸切除术的标准技术,但它需要外科专业知识且耗时。以前用于人体手术的硅橡胶带(srb)提供了一种潜在的替代方案。本研究旨在(1)评估常用的兽医绝育方法对SRB机械完整性的影响,(2)比较SRB与缝合结扎在猫睾丸切除术中的手术效果。材料与方法:28例srb随机分为4个灭菌组:不灭菌组(对照组)、2%葡萄糖酸氯己定组、高压灭菌组和过氧化氢气体等离子体灭菌组。使用万能试验机测试了带的极限拉伸强度(UTS),断裂伸长率和弹性模量。另外,20只健康雄性猫被随机分配使用SRB结扎(n = 10)或传统缝合结扎(n = 10)进行睾丸切除术。手术时间、术中/术后并发症、格拉斯哥复合测量疼痛量表评分、伤口愈合和胃肠道(GI)症状监测10天。结果:双氧水等离子体灭菌能保持SRB弹性,对UTS无明显影响,而高压灭菌和氯己定处理能提高SRB刚度,降低断裂伸长率(p < 0.05)。SRB结扎术比缝合结扎术(4.48±0.62 min, p < 0.01)显著缩短手术时间(3.06±0.32 min)。两组患者术后疼痛评分、创面愈合特征、并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组患者均有轻微胃肠道症状,但无统计学差异。结论:SRB结扎在猫睾丸切除术中是一种可行的、快捷的、临床可与传统缝合结扎相媲美的方法。由于过氧化氢气体等离子体对材料完整性的影响最小,因此推荐用于SRB灭菌。这种技术在高数量或资源有限的环境中可能特别有益,为控制猫的数量提供了一种安全、有效的方法。未来的研究应评估srb在兽医实践中的长期生物相容性和更广泛的外科应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and sterilization resilience of silicone rubber bands as an alternative to suture ligation in feline orchiectomy.

Efficacy and sterilization resilience of silicone rubber bands as an alternative to suture ligation in feline orchiectomy.

Efficacy and sterilization resilience of silicone rubber bands as an alternative to suture ligation in feline orchiectomy.

Efficacy and sterilization resilience of silicone rubber bands as an alternative to suture ligation in feline orchiectomy.

Background and aim: Suture ligation is the standard technique for feline orchiectomy, but it requires surgical expertise and is time-consuming. Silicone rubber bands (SRBs), previously used in human procedures, offer a potential alternative. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the effects of common veterinary sterilization methods on the mechanical integrity of SRBs and (2) compare the surgical outcomes of SRB versus suture ligation in feline orchiectomy.

Materials and methods: Twenty-eight: SRBs were randomly assigned to four sterilization groups: No sterilization (control), 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, autoclaving, and hydrogen peroxide gas plasma. Bands were tested for ultimate tensile strength (UTS), elongation at break, and elastic modulus using a universal testing machine. Separately, 20 healthy male cats were randomly assigned to undergo orchiectomy using either SRB ligation (n = 10) or traditional suture ligation (n = 10). Surgical time, intraoperative/post-operative complications, Glasgow composite measure pain scale scores, wound healing, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were monitored for 10 days.

Results: Hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilization preserved SRB elasticity without significantly affecting UTS, while autoclaving and chlorhexidine treatment increased stiffness and reduced elongation at break (p < 0.05). SRB ligation significantly reduced surgical time (3.06 ± 0.32 min) compared to suture ligation (4.48 ± 0.62 min; p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in post-operative pain scores, wound healing characteristics, or complication rates between groups (p > 0.05). Mild GI symptoms were observed in both groups but were not statistically different.

Conclusion: SRB ligation is a viable, time-efficient, and clinically comparable alternative to traditional suture ligation in feline orchiectomy. Hydrogen peroxide gas plasma is recommended for SRB sterilization due to its minimal impact on material integrity. This technique may be especially beneficial in high-volume or resource-limited settings, offering a safe, efficient approach to feline population control. Future research should evaluate the long-term biocompatibility and broader surgical applications of SRBs in veterinary practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary World
Veterinary World Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
317
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary World publishes high quality papers focusing on Veterinary and Animal Science. The fields of study are bacteriology, parasitology, pathology, virology, immunology, mycology, public health, biotechnology, meat science, fish diseases, nutrition, gynecology, genetics, wildlife, laboratory animals, animal models of human infections, prion diseases and epidemiology. Studies on zoonotic and emerging infections are highly appreciated. Review articles are highly appreciated. All articles published by Veterinary World are made freely and permanently accessible online. All articles to Veterinary World are posted online immediately as they are ready for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信