单侧双门静脉内窥镜还是微创手术治疗经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合?一项比较队列研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yansheng Huang, Zhen Chang, Sibo Wang, Baorong He
{"title":"单侧双门静脉内窥镜还是微创手术治疗经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合?一项比较队列研究。","authors":"Yansheng Huang, Zhen Chang, Sibo Wang, Baorong He","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE-TLIF) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 56 patients treated with UBE-TLIF or MIS-TLIF between June 2020 and June 2022. The VAS for leg and back pain, and ODI score were evaluated. Intervertebral height and interbody fusion were measured by radiographic image. Duration of operation, blood loss, length of hospital stay and complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS back and leg pain score, ODI, and Intervertebral height improved significantly at all time points after surgery. No significant differences in the VAS leg pain score, ODI, and Intervertebral height were observed between the groups at 7 days postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The VAS back pain score on postoperative day 7 was significantly higher in the MIS-TLIF group than in the UBE-TLIF group. However, there were no significant differences in the VAS back pain scores at the final follow-up between the groups. Blood loss was significantly lower in the UBE-TLIF group compared with the MIS-TLIF group, but no significant differences were observed in interbody fusion rate, operation time, length of hospital stay and complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lower blood loss and less immediate postoperative pain were associated with UBE-TLIF compared with MIS-TLIF. UBE-TLIF is an alternative to and offers similar clinical and radiological results as MIS-TLIF for treating patients with lumbar degenerative disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124543"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unilateral biportal endoscopy or minimally invasive surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? A comparative cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yansheng Huang, Zhen Chang, Sibo Wang, Baorong He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE-TLIF) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 56 patients treated with UBE-TLIF or MIS-TLIF between June 2020 and June 2022. The VAS for leg and back pain, and ODI score were evaluated. Intervertebral height and interbody fusion were measured by radiographic image. Duration of operation, blood loss, length of hospital stay and complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS back and leg pain score, ODI, and Intervertebral height improved significantly at all time points after surgery. No significant differences in the VAS leg pain score, ODI, and Intervertebral height were observed between the groups at 7 days postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The VAS back pain score on postoperative day 7 was significantly higher in the MIS-TLIF group than in the UBE-TLIF group. However, there were no significant differences in the VAS back pain scores at the final follow-up between the groups. Blood loss was significantly lower in the UBE-TLIF group compared with the MIS-TLIF group, but no significant differences were observed in interbody fusion rate, operation time, length of hospital stay and complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lower blood loss and less immediate postoperative pain were associated with UBE-TLIF compared with MIS-TLIF. UBE-TLIF is an alternative to and offers similar clinical and radiological results as MIS-TLIF for treating patients with lumbar degenerative disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"124543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124543\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较单侧双门静脉内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(UBE-TLIF)和微创手术(MIS-TLIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床和影像学结果。方法:该研究纳入了2020年6月至2022年6月期间接受UBE-TLIF或MIS-TLIF治疗的56例患者。评估腿部和背部疼痛的VAS评分和ODI评分。通过x线摄影测量椎间高度和椎间融合。记录手术时间、出血量、住院时间及并发症。结果:术后各时间点VAS腰、腿疼痛评分、ODI、椎间高度均有明显改善。术后7天和最后随访时,两组患者的VAS腿部疼痛评分、ODI和椎间高度均无显著差异。术后第7天,MIS-TLIF组VAS背部疼痛评分明显高于UBE-TLIF组。然而,在最后的随访中,两组之间的VAS背痛评分没有显著差异。与MIS-TLIF组相比,UBE-TLIF组出血量明显减少,但在体间融合率、手术时间、住院时间和并发症方面无显著差异。结论:与MIS-TLIF相比,UBE-TLIF与更少的出血量和更少的术后即时疼痛相关。UBE-TLIF是治疗腰椎退行性疾病患者的替代方案,其临床和放射学结果与MIS-TLIF相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unilateral biportal endoscopy or minimally invasive surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? A comparative cohort study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE-TLIF) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.

Methods: The study included 56 patients treated with UBE-TLIF or MIS-TLIF between June 2020 and June 2022. The VAS for leg and back pain, and ODI score were evaluated. Intervertebral height and interbody fusion were measured by radiographic image. Duration of operation, blood loss, length of hospital stay and complications were recorded.

Results: The VAS back and leg pain score, ODI, and Intervertebral height improved significantly at all time points after surgery. No significant differences in the VAS leg pain score, ODI, and Intervertebral height were observed between the groups at 7 days postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The VAS back pain score on postoperative day 7 was significantly higher in the MIS-TLIF group than in the UBE-TLIF group. However, there were no significant differences in the VAS back pain scores at the final follow-up between the groups. Blood loss was significantly lower in the UBE-TLIF group compared with the MIS-TLIF group, but no significant differences were observed in interbody fusion rate, operation time, length of hospital stay and complications.

Conclusions: Lower blood loss and less immediate postoperative pain were associated with UBE-TLIF compared with MIS-TLIF. UBE-TLIF is an alternative to and offers similar clinical and radiological results as MIS-TLIF for treating patients with lumbar degenerative disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信